我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts，但是像在Perl中一样，我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法，这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面，这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情，但使用getopts，我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
内置的getopts不能做到这一点。有一个外部的getopt(1)程序可以做到这一点，但是您只能在Linux上从util-linux包中获得它。它附带一个示例脚本getop -parse.bash。
还有一个getopts_long被写成shell函数。
其他回答
可以考虑以下三种实现方式:
Bash内置的getopts。这不支持带有双破折号前缀的长选项名。它只支持单字符选项。 BSD UNIX实现的独立getopt命令(这是MacOS使用的)。这也不支持长选项。 独立getopt的GNU实现。GNU getopt(3)(由Linux上的命令行getopt(1)使用)支持解析长选项。
其他一些答案给出了使用bash内置getopts模拟长选项的解决方案。该解决方案实际上生成了一个字符为“-”的短选项。所以你得到“——”作为标志。然后，后面的所有内容都变成OPTARG，并使用嵌套的case测试OPTARG。
这很聪明，但也需要注意:
getopts不能强制执行opt规范。如果用户提供了无效的选项，它不能返回错误。在解析OPTARG时，您必须自己进行错误检查。 OPTARG用于长选项名称，当长选项本身有参数时，这会使使用复杂化。你最终不得不自己编写代码作为一个额外的案例。
因此，虽然可以编写更多的代码来解决长选项支持不足的问题，但工作量要大得多，并且在一定程度上违背了使用getopt解析器来简化代码的目的。
发明了另一个版本的轮子……
这个函数(希望)是一个posix兼容的普通bourne shell替换GNU getopt。它支持短/长选项，可以接受强制/可选/无参数，并且指定选项的方式几乎与GNU getopt相同，因此转换是微不足道的。
当然，要放入脚本中，这仍然是相当大的代码块，但它大约是众所周知的getopt_long shell函数的一半行数，并且在您只想替换现有的GNU getopt使用的情况下可能更可取。
这是相当新的代码，所以是YMMV(如果因为某种原因它实际上与POSIX不兼容，请务必告诉我——可移植性是一开始的意图，但我没有一个有用的POSIX测试环境)。
代码和示例用法如下:
#!/bin/sh
# posix_getopt shell function
# Author: Phil S.
# Version: 1.0
# Created: 2016-07-05
# URL: http://stackoverflow.com/a/37087374/324105
# POSIX-compatible argument quoting and parameter save/restore
# http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html
# Usage:
# parameters=$(save "$@") # save the original parameters.
# eval "set -- ${parameters}" # restore the saved parameters.
save () {
local param
for param; do
printf %s\\n "$param" \
| sed "s/'/'\\\\''/g;1s/^/'/;\$s/\$/' \\\\/"
done
printf %s\\n " "
}
# Exit with status $1 after displaying error message $2.
exiterr () {
printf %s\\n "$2" >&2
exit $1
}
# POSIX-compatible command line option parsing.
# This function supports long options and optional arguments, and is
# a (largely-compatible) drop-in replacement for GNU getopt.
#
# Instead of:
# opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -- "$@")
# eval set -- ${opts}
#
# We instead use:
# opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
# eval "set -- ${opts}"
posix_getopt () { # args: "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@"
local shortopts longopts \
arg argtype getopt nonopt opt optchar optword suffix
shortopts="$1"
longopts="$2"
shift 2
getopt=
nonopt=
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
opt=
arg=
argtype=
case "$1" in
# '--' means don't parse the remaining options
( -- ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$@")"
shift $#
break
};;
# process short option
( -[!-]* ) { # -x[foo]
suffix=${1#-?} # foo
opt=${1%$suffix} # -x
optchar=${opt#-} # x
case "${shortopts}" in
( *${optchar}::* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *${optchar}:* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 "$1 requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *${optchar}* ) { # no argument
argtype=none
arg=
shift
# Handle multiple no-argument parameters combined as
# -xyz instead of -x -y -z. If we have just shifted
# parameter -xyz, we now replace it with -yz (which
# will be processed in the next iteration).
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
eval "set -- $(save "-${suffix}")$(save "$@")"
fi
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# process long option
( --?* ) { # --xarg[=foo]
suffix=${1#*=} # foo (unless there was no =)
if [ "${suffix}" = "$1" ]; then
suffix=
fi
opt=${1%=$suffix} # --xarg
optword=${opt#--} # xarg
case ",${longopts}," in
( *,${optword}::,* ) { # optional argument
argtype=optional
arg="${suffix}"
shift
};;
( *,${optword}:,* ) { # required argument
argtype=required
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
arg="${suffix}"
shift
else
case "$2" in
( -* ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
( ?* ) arg="$2"; shift 2;;
( * ) exiterr 1 \
"--${optword} requires an argument";;
esac
fi
};;
( *,${optword},* ) { # no argument
if [ -n "${suffix}" ]; then
exiterr 1 "--${optword} does not take an argument"
fi
argtype=none
arg=
shift
};;
( * ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
esac
};;
# any other parameters starting with -
( -* ) exiterr 1 "Unknown option $1";;
# remember non-option parameters
( * ) nonopt="${nonopt}$(save "$1")"; shift;;
esac
if [ -n "${opt}" ]; then
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$opt")"
case "${argtype}" in
( optional|required ) {
getopt="${getopt}$(save "$arg")"
};;
esac
fi
done
# Generate function output, suitable for:
# eval "set -- $(posix_getopt ...)"
printf %s "${getopt}"
if [ -n "${nonopt}" ]; then
printf %s "$(save "--")${nonopt}"
fi
}
使用示例:
# Process command line options
shortopts="hvd:c::s::L:D"
longopts="help,version,directory:,client::,server::,load:,delete"
#opts=$(getopt -o "$shortopts" -l "$longopts" -n "$(basename $0)" -- "$@")
opts=$(posix_getopt "$shortopts" "$longopts" "$@")
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
#eval set -- ${opts}
eval "set -- ${opts}"
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
case "$1" in
( -- ) shift; break;;
( -h|--help ) help=1; shift; break;;
( -v|--version ) version_help=1; shift; break;;
( -d|--directory ) dir=$2; shift 2;;
( -c|--client ) useclient=1; client=$2; shift 2;;
( -s|--server ) startserver=1; server_name=$2; shift 2;;
( -L|--load ) load=$2; shift 2;;
( -D|--delete ) delete=1; shift;;
esac
done
else
shorthelp=1 # getopt returned (and reported) an error.
fi
内置的getopts不能做到这一点。有一个外部的getopt(1)程序可以做到这一点，但是您只能在Linux上从util-linux包中获得它。它附带一个示例脚本getop -parse.bash。
还有一个getopts_long被写成shell函数。
我还没有足够的代表来评论或投票他的解决方案，但他的答案对我来说非常有效。我遇到的唯一问题是参数以单引号结尾(所以我把它们去掉了)。
我还添加了一些示例用法和帮助文本。我将在这里附上我略微扩展的版本:
#!/bin/bash
# getopt example
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
HELP_TEXT=\
" USAGE:\n
Accepts - and -- flags, can specify options that require a value, and can be in any order. A double-hyphen (--) will stop processing options.\n\n
Accepts the following forms:\n\n
getopt-example.sh -a -b -c value-for-c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -c value-for-c -a -b some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh -abc some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh --along --blong --clong value-for-c -a -b -c some-arg\n
getopt-example.sh some-arg --clong value-for-c\n
getopt-example.sh
"
aflag=false
bflag=false
cargument=""
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc:h\? -l along,blong,help,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag=true ;;
-b|--blong) bflag=true ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
-h|--help|-\?) echo -e $HELP_TEXT; exit;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
# to remove the single quotes around arguments, pipe the output into:
# | sed -e "s/^'\\|'$//g" (just leading/trailing) or | sed -e "s/'//g" (all)
echo aflag=${aflag}
echo bflag=${bflag}
echo cargument=${cargument}
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
echo arg=$1
shift
if [[ $aflag == true ]]; then
echo a is true
fi
done
我只是偶尔写一些shell脚本，但没有实践经验，所以任何反馈都很感激。
使用@Arvid Requate提出的策略，我们注意到一些用户错误。忘记包含值的用户会意外地将下一个选项的名称视为值:
./getopts_test.sh --loglevel= --toc=TRUE
将导致"loglevel"的值被视为"——toc=TRUE"。这可以 被避免的。
我从http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035关于手动解析的讨论中改编了一些关于检查CLI用户错误的想法。我在处理"-"和"——"参数时插入了错误检查。
然后我开始摆弄语法，所以这里的任何错误都是我的错，而不是原始作者的错。
我的方法可以帮助那些喜欢输入带等号或不带等号的长字符的用户。也就是说，它对“——loglevel 9”的响应应该与“——loglevel=9”的响应相同。在——/space方法中，不可能确定用户是否忘记了一个参数，因此需要进行一些猜测。
如果用户使用长/等号格式(——opt=)，则=后的空格会触发错误，因为没有提供参数。 如果user有长/空格参数(——opt)，如果后面没有参数(命令结束)或参数以破折号开头，该脚本将导致失败。
In case you are starting out on this, there is an interesting difference between "--opt=value" and "--opt value" formats. With the equal sign, the command line argument is seen as "opt=value" and the work to handle that is string parsing, to separate at the "=". In contrast, with "--opt value", the name of the argument is "opt" and we have the challenge of getting the next value supplied in the command line. That's where @Arvid Requate used ${!OPTIND}, the indirect reference. I still don't understand that, well, at all, and comments in BashFAQ seem to warn against that style (http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/006). BTW, I don't think previous poster's comments about importance of OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) are correct. I mean to say, I see no harm from omitting it.
在该脚本的最新版本中，flag -v表示详细打印输出。
将其保存在一个名为“cli-5.sh”的文件中，使其可执行，其中任何一个都将以预期的方式工作或失败
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc TRUE
./cli-5.sh -v --loglevel=44 --toc=TRUE
./cli-5.sh --loglevel 7
./cli-5.sh --loglevel=8
./cli-5.sh -l9
./cli-5.sh --toc FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh --toc=FALSE --loglevel=77
./cli-5.sh -l99 -t yyy
./cli-5.sh -l 99 -t yyy
下面是对用户intpu进行错误检查的示例输出
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc --loglevel=77
ERROR: toc value must not have dash at beginning
$ ./cli-5.sh --toc= --loglevel=77
ERROR: value for toc undefined
您应该考虑打开-v，因为它会打印OPTIND和OPTARG的内部内容
#/usr/bin/env bash
## Paul Johnson
## 20171016
##
## Combines ideas from
## https://stackoverflow.com/questions/402377/using-getopts-in-bash-shell-script-to-get-long-and-short-command-line-options
## by @Arvid Requate, and http://mwiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/035
# What I don't understand yet:
# In @Arvid REquate's answer, we have
# val="${!OPTIND}"; OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 ))
# this works, but I don't understand it!
die() {
printf '%s\n' "$1" >&2
exit 1
}
printparse(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'Parse: %s%s%s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" >&2;
fi
}
showme(){
if [ ${VERBOSE} -gt 0 ]; then
printf 'VERBOSE: %s\n' "$1" >&2;
fi
}
VERBOSE=0
loglevel=0
toc="TRUE"
optspec=":vhl:t:-:"
while getopts "$optspec" OPTCHAR; do
showme "OPTARG: ${OPTARG[*]}"
showme "OPTIND: ${OPTIND[*]}"
case "${OPTCHAR}" in
-)
case "${OPTARG}" in
loglevel) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) # CAUTION! no effect?
printparse "--${OPTARG}" " " "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
shift
;;
loglevel=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
printparse "--${opt}" "=" "${val}"
loglevel="${val}"
## shift CAUTION don't shift this, fails othewise
else
die "ERROR: $opt value must be supplied"
fi
;;
toc) #argument has no equal sign
opt=${OPTARG}
val="${!OPTIND}"
## check value. If negative, assume user forgot value
showme "OPTIND is {$OPTIND} {!OPTIND} has value \"${!OPTIND}\""
if [[ "$val" == -* ]]; then
die "ERROR: $opt value must not have dash at beginning"
fi
## OPTIND=$(( $OPTIND + 1 )) #??
printparse "--${opt}" " " "${val}"
toc="${val}"
shift
;;
toc=*) #argument has equal sign
opt=${OPTARG%=*}
val=${OPTARG#*=}
if [ "${OPTARG#*=}" ]; then
toc=${val}
printparse "--$opt" " -> " "$toc"
##shift ## NO! dont shift this
else
die "ERROR: value for $opt undefined"
fi
;;
help)
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" = 1 ] && [ "${optspec:0:1}" != ":" ]; then
echo "Unknown option --${OPTARG}" >&2
fi
;;
esac;;
h|-\?|--help)
## must rewrite this for all of the arguments
echo "usage: $0 [-v] [--loglevel[=]<value>] [--toc[=]<TRUE,FALSE>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
l)
loglevel=${OPTARG}
printparse "-l" " " "${loglevel}"
;;
t)
toc=${OPTARG}
;;
v)
VERBOSE=1
;;
*)
if [ "$OPTERR" != 1 ] || [ "${optspec:0:1}" = ":" ]; then
echo "Non-option argument: '-${OPTARG}'" >&2
fi
;;
esac
done
echo "
After Parsing values
"
echo "loglevel $loglevel"
echo "toc $toc"
