你必须知道以字节表示的字符串的编码，但是你可以说System.Text.UTF8Encoding.GetString(字节)或System.Text.ASCIIEncoding.GetString(字节)。(我是根据记忆做的，所以API可能不完全正确，但它非常接近。)

第二个问题的答案，请看这个问题。

我不经常把字节转换成十六进制所以我不知道有没有更好的方法，但这里有一种方法。

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
foreach (byte b in myByteArray)
    sb.Append(b.ToString("X2"));

string hexString = sb.ToString();

正如其他人所说，这取决于字节数组中值的编码方式。尽管如此，您还是需要非常小心地处理这类事情，否则您可能会尝试转换未被所选编码处理的字节。

Jon Skeet有一篇关于。net中的编码和unicode的好文章。推荐阅读。

十六进制,Linq-fu:

string.Concat(ba.Select(b => b.ToString("X2")).ToArray())

与时俱进

正如@RubenBartelink所指出的，没有将IEnumerable<string>转换为数组的代码:ba。Select(b => b. tostring ("X2"))在4.0之前不工作，相同的代码现在在4.0上工作。

这段代码…

byte[] ba = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 };

string s = string.Concat(ba.Select(b => b.ToString("X2")));
string t = string.Concat(ba.Select(b => b.ToString("X2")).ToArray());

Console.WriteLine (s);
Console.WriteLine (t);

.．.在。net 4.0之前，输出是:

System.Linq.Enumerable+<CreateSelectIterator>c__Iterator10`2[System.Byte,System.String]
010204081020

在。net 4.0以后，字符串。Concat有一个接受IEnumerable的重载。因此，在4.0版本中，上述代码对于变量s和t将有相同的输出

010204081020
010204081020

4.0之前，ba。Select(b => b.ToString("X2"))将重载(对象arg0)， IEnumerable<string>进入适当重载的方式，即(params string[] values)，是我们需要将IEnumerable<string>转换为字符串数组。4.0之前，字符串。Concat有10个过载功能，在4.0现在是12个

有一个内置的方法:

byte[] data = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 };

string hex = BitConverter.ToString(data);

结果:01-02-04-08-10-20

如果你想要没有破折号，只需删除它们:

string hex = BitConverter.ToString(data).Replace("-", string.Empty);

结果:010204081020

如果你想要一个更紧凑的表示，你可以使用Base64:

string base64 = Convert.ToBase64String(data);

结果:AQIECBAg

你把LINQ和字符串方法结合起来:

string hex = string.Join("",
  bin.Select(
    bin => bin.ToString("X2")
      ).ToArray());

我喜欢将扩展方法用于这样的转换，即使它们只是包装标准库方法。在十六进制转换的情况下，我使用以下手动调优(即快速)算法:

public static string ToHex(this byte[] bytes)
{
    char[] c = new char[bytes.Length * 2];

    byte b;

    for(int bx = 0, cx = 0; bx < bytes.Length; ++bx, ++cx) 
    {
        b = ((byte)(bytes[bx] >> 4));
        c[cx] = (char)(b > 9 ? b + 0x37 + 0x20 : b + 0x30);

        b = ((byte)(bytes[bx] & 0x0F));
        c[++cx]=(char)(b > 9 ? b + 0x37 + 0x20 : b + 0x30);
    }

    return new string(c);
}

public static byte[] HexToBytes(this string str)
{
    if (str.Length == 0 || str.Length % 2 != 0)
        return new byte[0];

    byte[] buffer = new byte[str.Length / 2];
    char c;
    for (int bx = 0, sx = 0; bx < buffer.Length; ++bx, ++sx)
    {
        // Convert first half of byte
        c = str[sx];
        buffer[bx] = (byte)((c > '9' ? (c > 'Z' ? (c - 'a' + 10) : (c - 'A' + 10)) : (c - '0')) << 4);

        // Convert second half of byte
        c = str[++sx];
        buffer[bx] |= (byte)(c > '9' ? (c > 'Z' ? (c - 'a' + 10) : (c - 'A' + 10)) : (c - '0'));
    }

    return buffer;
}

用LINQ做这件事的好方法…

var data = new byte[] { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 }; 
var hexString = data.Aggregate(new StringBuilder(), 
                               (sb,v)=>sb.Append(v.ToString("X2"))
                              ).ToString();

下面是另一种方法:

public static string ByteArrayToHexString(byte[] Bytes)
{
    StringBuilder Result = new StringBuilder(Bytes.Length * 2);
    string HexAlphabet = "0123456789ABCDEF";

    foreach (byte B in Bytes)
    {
        Result.Append(HexAlphabet[(int)(B >> 4)]);
        Result.Append(HexAlphabet[(int)(B & 0xF)]);
    }

    return Result.ToString();
}

public static byte[] HexStringToByteArray(string Hex)
{
    byte[] Bytes = new byte[Hex.Length / 2];
    int[] HexValue = new int[] { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 
       0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 
       0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F };

    for (int x = 0, i = 0; i < Hex.Length; i += 2, x += 1)
    {
        Bytes[x] = (byte)(HexValue[Char.ToUpper(Hex[i + 0]) - '0'] << 4 |
                          HexValue[Char.ToUpper(Hex[i + 1]) - '0']);
    }

    return Bytes;
}

或者，你可以像这样预先构建翻译表，以获得更快的结果:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/blambert/archive/2009/02/22/blambert-codesnip-fast-byte-array-to-hex-string-conversion.aspx

下面是一个字节数组(byte[])的扩展方法，例如:

var b = new byte[] { 15, 22, 255, 84, 45, 65, 7, 28, 59, 10 };
Console.WriteLine(b.ToHexString());


public static class HexByteArrayExtensionMethods
{
    private const int AllocateThreshold = 256;
    private const string UpperHexChars = "0123456789ABCDEF";
    private const string LowerhexChars = "0123456789abcdef";
    private static string[] upperHexBytes;
    private static string[] lowerHexBytes;

    public static string ToHexString(this byte[] value)
    {
        return ToHexString(value, false);
    }

    public static string ToHexString(this byte[] value, bool upperCase)
    {
        if (value == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("value");
        }

        if (value.Length == 0)
        {
            return string.Empty;
        }

        if (upperCase)
        {
            if (upperHexBytes != null)
            {
                return ToHexStringFast(value, upperHexBytes);
            }

            if (value.Length > AllocateThreshold)
            {
                return ToHexStringFast(value, UpperHexBytes);
            }

            return ToHexStringSlow(value, UpperHexChars);
        }

        if (lowerHexBytes != null)
        {
            return ToHexStringFast(value, lowerHexBytes);
        }

        if (value.Length > AllocateThreshold)
        {
            return ToHexStringFast(value, LowerHexBytes);
        }

        return ToHexStringSlow(value, LowerhexChars);
    }

    private static string ToHexStringSlow(byte[] value, string hexChars)
    {
        var hex = new char[value.Length * 2];
        int j = 0;

        for (var i = 0; i < value.Length; i++)
        {
            var b = value[i];
            hex[j++] = hexChars[b >> 4];
            hex[j++] = hexChars[b & 15];
        }

        return new string(hex);
    }

    private static string ToHexStringFast(byte[] value, string[] hexBytes)
    {
        var hex = new char[value.Length * 2];
        int j = 0;

        for (var i = 0; i < value.Length; i++)
        {
            var s = hexBytes[value[i]];
            hex[j++] = s[0];
            hex[j++] = s[1];
        }

        return new string(hex);
    }

    private static string[] UpperHexBytes
    {
        get
        {
            return (upperHexBytes ?? (upperHexBytes = new[] {
                "00", "01", "02", "03", "04", "05", "06", "07", "08", "09", "0A", "0B", "0C", "0D", "0E", "0F",
                "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "1A", "1B", "1C", "1D", "1E", "1F",
                "20", "21", "22", "23", "24", "25", "26", "27", "28", "29", "2A", "2B", "2C", "2D", "2E", "2F",
                "30", "31", "32", "33", "34", "35", "36", "37", "38", "39", "3A", "3B", "3C", "3D", "3E", "3F",
                "40", "41", "42", "43", "44", "45", "46", "47", "48", "49", "4A", "4B", "4C", "4D", "4E", "4F",
                "50", "51", "52", "53", "54", "55", "56", "57", "58", "59", "5A", "5B", "5C", "5D", "5E", "5F",
                "60", "61", "62", "63", "64", "65", "66", "67", "68", "69", "6A", "6B", "6C", "6D", "6E", "6F",
                "70", "71", "72", "73", "74", "75", "76", "77", "78", "79", "7A", "7B", "7C", "7D", "7E", "7F",
                "80", "81", "82", "83", "84", "85", "86", "87", "88", "89", "8A", "8B", "8C", "8D", "8E", "8F",
                "90", "91", "92", "93", "94", "95", "96", "97", "98", "99", "9A", "9B", "9C", "9D", "9E", "9F",
                "A0", "A1", "A2", "A3", "A4", "A5", "A6", "A7", "A8", "A9", "AA", "AB", "AC", "AD", "AE", "AF",
                "B0", "B1", "B2", "B3", "B4", "B5", "B6", "B7", "B8", "B9", "BA", "BB", "BC", "BD", "BE", "BF",
                "C0", "C1", "C2", "C3", "C4", "C5", "C6", "C7", "C8", "C9", "CA", "CB", "CC", "CD", "CE", "CF",
                "D0", "D1", "D2", "D3", "D4", "D5", "D6", "D7", "D8", "D9", "DA", "DB", "DC", "DD", "DE", "DF",
                "E0", "E1", "E2", "E3", "E4", "E5", "E6", "E7", "E8", "E9", "EA", "EB", "EC", "ED", "EE", "EF",
                "F0", "F1", "F2", "F3", "F4", "F5", "F6", "F7", "F8", "F9", "FA", "FB", "FC", "FD", "FE", "FF" }));
        }
    }

    private static string[] LowerHexBytes
    {
        get
        {
            return (lowerHexBytes ?? (lowerHexBytes = new[] {
                "00", "01", "02", "03", "04", "05", "06", "07", "08", "09", "0a", "0b", "0c", "0d", "0e", "0f",
                "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19", "1a", "1b", "1c", "1d", "1e", "1f",
                "20", "21", "22", "23", "24", "25", "26", "27", "28", "29", "2a", "2b", "2c", "2d", "2e", "2f",
                "30", "31", "32", "33", "34", "35", "36", "37", "38", "39", "3a", "3b", "3c", "3d", "3e", "3f",
                "40", "41", "42", "43", "44", "45", "46", "47", "48", "49", "4a", "4b", "4c", "4d", "4e", "4f",
                "50", "51", "52", "53", "54", "55", "56", "57", "58", "59", "5a", "5b", "5c", "5d", "5e", "5f",
                "60", "61", "62", "63", "64", "65", "66", "67", "68", "69", "6a", "6b", "6c", "6d", "6e", "6f",
                "70", "71", "72", "73", "74", "75", "76", "77", "78", "79", "7a", "7b", "7c", "7d", "7e", "7f",
                "80", "81", "82", "83", "84", "85", "86", "87", "88", "89", "8a", "8b", "8c", "8d", "8e", "8f",
                "90", "91", "92", "93", "94", "95", "96", "97", "98", "99", "9a", "9b", "9c", "9d", "9e", "9f",
                "a0", "a1", "a2", "a3", "a4", "a5", "a6", "a7", "a8", "a9", "aa", "ab", "ac", "ad", "ae", "af",
                "b0", "b1", "b2", "b3", "b4", "b5", "b6", "b7", "b8", "b9", "ba", "bb", "bc", "bd", "be", "bf",
                "c0", "c1", "c2", "c3", "c4", "c5", "c6", "c7", "c8", "c9", "ca", "cb", "cc", "cd", "ce", "cf",
                "d0", "d1", "d2", "d3", "d4", "d5", "d6", "d7", "d8", "d9", "da", "db", "dc", "dd", "de", "df",
                "e0", "e1", "e2", "e3", "e4", "e5", "e6", "e7", "e8", "e9", "ea", "eb", "ec", "ed", "ee", "ef",
                "f0", "f1", "f2", "f3", "f4", "f5", "f6", "f7", "f8", "f9", "fa", "fb", "fc", "fd", "fe", "ff" }));
        }
    }
}

.Net5.0更新

感谢@antoninkriz的基准比较，我们可以看到Convert。到目前为止，ToHexString是明显的赢家

使用Convert.ToHexString以外的任何方法都是愚蠢的。在我看来，它在可读性、性能和安全性方面明显更胜一筹

剩下的是2012年4月10日之前的数据:

我想我应该尝试比较这里列出的每个方法的速度。我基于这个编写了速度测试代码。

结果是BitConverter+String。替换似乎比大多数其他简单的方法更快。但是可以通过像Nathan Moinvaziri的ByteArrayToHexString或Kurt的ToHex这样的算法来提高速度。

我还发现了一个有趣的字符串。连接和串。对于长字符串，Join比StringBuilder实现慢得多，但对于较短的数组也类似。可能是由于在较长的字符串上扩展StringBuilder，所以设置初始大小应该消除这种差异。

Took each bit of code from an answer here: BitConvertRep = Answer by Guffa, BitConverter and String.Replace (I'd recommend for most cases, [edit:] where you can't use Convert.ToHexString) StringBuilder = Answer by Quintin Robinson, foreach char StringBuilder.Append LinqConcat = Answer by Michael Buen, string.Concat of Linq built array LinqJoin = Answer by mloskot, string.Join of Linq built array LinqAgg = Answer by Matthew Whited, IEnumerable.Aggregate with StringBuilder ToHex = Answer by Kurt, sets chars in an array, using byte values to get hex ByteArrayToHexString = Answer by Nathan Moinvaziri, approx same speed as the ToHex above, and is probably easier to read (I'd recommend for speed, [edit:] where you can't use Convert.ToHexString) ToHexFromTable = Linked in answer by Nathan Moinvaziri, for me this is near the same speed as the above 2 but requires an array of 256 strings to always exist

With: LONG_STRING_LENGTH = 1000 * 1024; BitConvertRep calculation Time Elapsed 27,202 ms (fastest built in/simple) StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 75,723 ms (StringBuilder no reallocate) LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 182,094 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 181,142 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 93,087 ms (StringBuilder with reallocating) ToHex calculation Time Elapsed 19,167 ms (fastest) With: LONG_STRING_LENGTH = 100 * 1024;, Similar results BitConvertReplace calculation Time Elapsed 3431 ms StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 8289 ms LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 21512 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 19433 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 9230 ms ToHex calculation Time Elapsed 1976 ms With: int MANY_STRING_COUNT = 1000; int MANY_STRING_LENGTH = 1024; (Same byte count as first test but in different arrays) BitConvertReplace calculation Time Elapsed 25,680 ms StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 78,411 ms LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 101,233 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 99,311 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 84,660 ms ToHex calculation Time Elapsed 18,221 ms With: int MANY_STRING_COUNT = 2000; int MANY_STRING_LENGTH = 20; BitConvertReplace calculation Time Elapsed 1347 ms StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 3234 ms LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 5013 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 4826 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 3589 ms ToHex calculation Time Elapsed 772 ms

我使用的测试代码:

void Main()
{
    int LONG_STRING_LENGTH = 100 * 1024;
    int MANY_STRING_COUNT = 1024;
    int MANY_STRING_LENGTH = 100;

    var source = GetRandomBytes(LONG_STRING_LENGTH);

    List<byte[]> manyString = new List<byte[]>(MANY_STRING_COUNT);
    for (int i = 0; i < MANY_STRING_COUNT; ++i)
    {
        manyString.Add(GetRandomBytes(MANY_STRING_LENGTH));
    }

    var algorithms = new Dictionary<string,Func<byte[], string>>();
    algorithms["BitConvertReplace"] = BitConv;
    algorithms["StringBuilder"] = StringBuilderTest;
    algorithms["LinqConcat"] = LinqConcat;
    algorithms["LinqJoin"] = LinqJoin;
    algorithms["LinqAgg"] = LinqAgg;
    algorithms["ToHex"] = ToHex;
    algorithms["ByteArrayToHexString"] = ByteArrayToHexString;

    Console.WriteLine(" === Long string test");
    foreach (var pair in algorithms) {
        TimeAction(pair.Key + " calculation", 500, () =>
        {
            pair.Value(source);
        });
    }

    Console.WriteLine(" === Many string test");
    foreach (var pair in algorithms) {
        TimeAction(pair.Key + " calculation", 500, () =>
        {
            foreach (var str in manyString)
            {
                pair.Value(str);
            }
        });
    }
}

// Define other methods and classes here
static void TimeAction(string description, int iterations, Action func) {
    var watch = new Stopwatch();
    watch.Start();
    for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
        func();
    }
    watch.Stop();
    Console.Write(description);
    Console.WriteLine(" Time Elapsed {0} ms", watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}

//static byte[] GetRandomBytes(int count) {
//  var bytes = new byte[count];
//  (new Random()).NextBytes(bytes);
//  return bytes;
//}
static Random rand = new Random();
static byte[] GetRandomBytes(int count) {
    var bytes = new byte[count];
    rand.NextBytes(bytes);
    return bytes;
}


static string BitConv(byte[] data)
{
    return BitConverter.ToString(data).Replace("-", string.Empty);
}
static string StringBuilderTest(byte[] data)
{
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(data.Length*2);
    foreach (byte b in data)
        sb.Append(b.ToString("X2"));

    return sb.ToString();
}
static string LinqConcat(byte[] data)
{
    return string.Concat(data.Select(b => b.ToString("X2")).ToArray());
}
static string LinqJoin(byte[] data)
{
    return string.Join("",
        data.Select(
            bin => bin.ToString("X2")
            ).ToArray());
}
static string LinqAgg(byte[] data)
{
    return data.Aggregate(new StringBuilder(),
                               (sb,v)=>sb.Append(v.ToString("X2"))
                              ).ToString();
}
static string ToHex(byte[] bytes)
{
    char[] c = new char[bytes.Length * 2];

    byte b;

    for(int bx = 0, cx = 0; bx < bytes.Length; ++bx, ++cx)
    {
        b = ((byte)(bytes[bx] >> 4));
        c[cx] = (char)(b > 9 ? b - 10 + 'A' : b + '0');

        b = ((byte)(bytes[bx] & 0x0F));
        c[++cx] = (char)(b > 9 ? b - 10 + 'A' : b + '0');
    }

    return new string(c);
}
public static string ByteArrayToHexString(byte[] Bytes)
{
    StringBuilder Result = new StringBuilder(Bytes.Length*2);
    string HexAlphabet = "0123456789ABCDEF";

    foreach (byte B in Bytes)
        {
        Result.Append(HexAlphabet[(int)(B >> 4)]);
        Result.Append(HexAlphabet[(int)(B & 0xF)]);
        }

    return Result.ToString();
}

还有一个类似过程的答案，我还没有比较我们的结果。

:

byte[] data = new byte[] { 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F };
string hex = string.Empty;
data.ToList().ForEach(b => hex += b.ToString("x2"));
// use "X2" for uppercase hex letters
Console.WriteLine(hex);

结果:0102030 d0e0f

private static string GuidToRaw(Guid guid)
{
    byte[] bytes = guid.ToByteArray();

    int сharCount = bytes.Length * 2;
    char[] chars = new char[сharCount];

    int index = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < сharCount; i += 2)
    {
        byte b = bytes[index++];
        chars[i] = GetHexValue((int)(b / 16));
        chars[i + 1] = GetHexValue((int)(b % 16));
    }
    return new string(chars, 0, chars.Length);
}

private static char GetHexValue(int i)
{
    return (char)(i < 10 ? i + 48 : i + 55);
}

我想我做了一个更快的字节数组到字符串转换器:

public static class HexTable
{
    private static readonly string[] table = BitConverter.ToString(Enumerable.Range(0, 256).Select(x => (byte)x).ToArray()).Split('-');

    public static string ToHexTable(byte[] value)
    {
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(2 * value.Length);

        for (int i = 0; i < value.Length; i++)
            sb.Append(table[value[i]]);

        return sb.ToString();
    }

并且测试设置:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
        const int TEST_COUNT = 10000;
        const int BUFFER_LENGTH = 100000;

        Random random = new Random();

        Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
        Stopwatch sw2 = new Stopwatch();

        byte[] buffer = new byte[BUFFER_LENGTH];
        random.NextBytes(buffer);

        sw.Start();
        for (int j = 0; j < TEST_COUNT; j++)
            HexTable.ToHexTable(buffer);

        sw.Stop();

        sw2.Start();
        for (int j = 0; j < TEST_COUNT; j++)
            ToHexChar.ToHex(buffer);

        sw2.Stop();

        Console.WriteLine("Hex Table Elapsed Milliseconds: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
        Console.WriteLine("ToHex Elapsed Milliseconds: {0}", sw2.ElapsedMilliseconds);
    }

ToHexChar.ToHEx()方法是前面所示的ToHex()方法。

结果如下:

HexTable = 11808 ms ToHEx = 12168ms

它看起来可能没有太大的不同，但它仍然更快:)

再向这个堆中添加一个答案，有一个System.Runtime.Remoting.Metadata.W3cXsd2001。SoapHexBinary类，我已经使用它可以转换字节和十六进制:

string hex = new SoapHexBinary(bytes).ToString();
byte[] bytes = SoapHexBinary.Parse(hex).Value;

不确定它与其他实现(基准)相比如何，但在我看来，它非常简单——特别是从十六进制转换回字节。

这里没人提到你为什么会有"系统"字节[]"字符串，而不是值，所以我将。

当一个对象隐式转换为String类型时，程序将默认使用该对象的公共String ToString()方法，该方法从System继承而来。对象:

public virtual string ToString()
{
    return this.GetType().ToString();
}

如果你发现你经常进行这种转换，你可以简单地创建一个包装器类，并像这样重写这个方法:

public override string ToString()
{
    // do the processing here
    // return the nicely formatted string
}

现在每次打印这个包装器对象时，你将得到你自己的值，而不是this. gettype (). tostring()的值。

我想我应该给出一个答案。从我的测试来看，这种方法是最快的

public static class Helper
{
    public static string[] HexTbl = Enumerable.Range(0, 256).Select(v => v.ToString("X2")).ToArray();
    public static string ToHex(this IEnumerable<byte> array)
    {
        StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
        foreach (var v in array)
            s.Append(HexTbl[v]);
        return s.ToString();
    }
    public static string ToHex(this byte[] array)
    {
        StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder(array.Length*2);
        foreach (var v in array)
            s.Append(HexTbl[v]);
        return s.ToString();
    }
}

我不确定你是否需要这样做的性能，但这里是最快的方法转换字节[]到十六进制字符串，我能想到:

static readonly char[] hexchar = new char[] { '0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' };
public static string HexStr(byte[] data, int offset, int len, bool space = false)
{
    int i = 0, k = 2;
    if (space) k++;
    var c = new char[len * k];
    while (i < len)
    {
        byte d = data[offset + i];
        c[i * k] = hexchar[d / 0x10];
        c[i * k + 1] = hexchar[d % 0x10];
        if (space && i < len - 1) c[i * k + 2] = ' ';
        i++;
    }
    return new string(c, 0, c.Length);
}

非常快速的扩展方法(带反转):

public static class ExtensionMethods {
    public static string ToHex(this byte[] data) {
        return ToHex(data, "");
    }
    public static string ToHex(this byte[] data, string prefix) {
        char[] lookup = new char[] { '0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F' };
        int i = 0, p = prefix.Length, l = data.Length;
        char[] c = new char[l * 2 + p];
        byte d;
        for(; i < p; ++i) c[i] = prefix[i];
        i = -1;
        --l;
        --p;
        while(i < l) {
            d = data[++i];
            c[++p] = lookup[d >> 4];
            c[++p] = lookup[d & 0xF];
        }
        return new string(c, 0, c.Length);
    }
    public static byte[] FromHex(this string str) {
        return FromHex(str, 0, 0, 0);
    }
    public static byte[] FromHex(this string str, int offset, int step) {
        return FromHex(str, offset, step, 0);
    }
    public static byte[] FromHex(this string str, int offset, int step, int tail) {
        byte[] b = new byte[(str.Length - offset - tail + step) / (2 + step)];
        byte c1, c2;
        int l = str.Length - tail;
        int s = step + 1;
        for(int y = 0, x = offset; x < l; ++y, x += s) {
            c1 = (byte)str[x];
            if(c1 > 0x60) c1 -= 0x57;
            else if(c1 > 0x40) c1 -= 0x37;
            else c1 -= 0x30;
            c2 = (byte)str[++x];
            if(c2 > 0x60) c2 -= 0x57;
            else if(c2 > 0x40) c2 -= 0x37;
            else c2 -= 0x30;
            b[y] = (byte)((c1 << 4) + c2);
        }
        return b;
    }
}

在上面的速度测试中击败所有其他人:

=== Long string test BitConvertReplace calculation Time Elapsed 2415 ms StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 5668 ms LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 11826 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 9323 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 7444 ms ToHexTable calculation Time Elapsed 1028 ms ToHexAcidzombie calculation Time Elapsed 1035 ms ToHexPatrick calculation Time Elapsed 814 ms ToHexKurt calculation Time Elapsed 1604 ms ByteArrayToHexString calculation Time Elapsed 1330 ms === Many string test BitConvertReplace calculation Time Elapsed 2238 ms StringBuilder calculation Time Elapsed 5393 ms LinqConcat calculation Time Elapsed 9043 ms LinqJoin calculation Time Elapsed 9131 ms LinqAgg calculation Time Elapsed 7324 ms ToHexTable calculation Time Elapsed 968 ms ToHexAcidzombie calculation Time Elapsed 969 ms ToHexPatrick calculation Time Elapsed 956 ms ToHexKurt calculation Time Elapsed 1547 ms ByteArrayToHexString calculation Time Elapsed 1277 ms