volatile关键字的作用是什么?在c++中它能解决什么问题?
就我而言,我从来没有明知肚明地需要它。
volatile关键字的作用是什么?在c++中它能解决什么问题?
就我而言,我从来没有明知肚明地需要它。
当前回答
volatile关键字的目的是防止编译器对可能以编译器无法确定的方式改变的对象应用任何优化。
声明为volatile的对象在优化中被省略,因为它们的值可以被当前代码范围之外的代码随时更改。系统总是从内存位置读取volatile对象的当前值,而不是在请求时将其值保存在临时寄存器中,即使之前的指令从同一对象中请求一个值。
考虑以下情况
1)由中断服务例程在作用域外修改的全局变量。
2)多线程应用程序中的全局变量。
如果不使用volatile限定符,可能会出现以下问题
1)当优化被打开时,代码可能不会像预期的那样工作。
2)当中断被启用和使用时,代码可能不会像预期的那样工作。
Volatile:程序员最好的朋友
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatile_ (computer_programming)
其他回答
我想引用Herb Sutter在GotW #95中的一句话,这有助于理解volatile变量的含义:
C++ volatile variables (which have no analog in languages like C# and Java) are always beyond the scope of this and any other article about the memory model and synchronization. That’s because C++ volatile variables aren’t about threads or communication at all and don’t interact with those things. Rather, a C++ volatile variable should be viewed as portal into a different universe beyond the language — a memory location that by definition does not obey the language’s memory model because that memory location is accessed by hardware (e.g., written to by a daughter card), have more than one address, or is otherwise “strange” and beyond the language. So C++ volatile variables are universally an exception to every guideline about synchronization because are always inherently “racy” and unsynchronizable using the normal tools (mutexes, atomics, etc.) and more generally exist outside all normal of the language and compiler including that they generally cannot be optimized by the compiler (because the compiler isn’t allowed to know their semantics; a volatile int vi; may not behave anything like a normal int, and you can’t even assume that code like vi = 5; int read_back = vi; is guaranteed to result in read_back == 5, or that code like int i = vi; int j = vi; that reads vi twice will result in i == j which will not be true if vi is a hardware counter for example).
Dan Saks在《Volatile as a promise》一文中写道:
易失性对象是其值可能自发变化的对象。也就是说,当你声明一个对象为volatile时,你是在告诉编译器这个对象可能会改变状态,即使程序中没有任何语句显示要改变它。”
以下是他关于volatile关键字的三篇文章的链接:
明智地使用挥发剂 准确放置挥发剂 像承诺一样反复无常
我曾经在20世纪90年代早期开发过一个大型应用程序,其中包含使用setjmp和longjmp进行基于c语言的异常处理。volatile关键字对于那些值需要保存在作为“catch”子句的代码块中的变量是必要的,以免这些变量被存储在寄存器中并被longjmp清除。
在标准C中,使用volatile的一个地方是在信号处理程序中。事实上,在标准C中,在信号处理程序中可以安全地做的就是修改易失性sig_atomic_t变量,或者快速退出。事实上,AFAIK,这是标准C中唯一需要使用volatile来避免未定义行为的地方。
ISO/IEC 9899:2011 §7.14.1.1 The signal function ¶5 If the signal occurs other than as the result of calling the abort or raise function, the behavior is undefined if the signal handler refers to any object with static or thread storage duration that is not a lock-free atomic object other than by assigning a value to an object declared as volatile sig_atomic_t, or the signal handler calls any function in the standard library other than the abort function, the _Exit function, the quick_exit function, or the signal function with the first argument equal to the signal number corresponding to the signal that caused the invocation of the handler. Furthermore, if such a call to the signal function results in a SIG_ERR return, the value of errno is indeterminate.252) 252) If any signal is generated by an asynchronous signal handler, the behavior is undefined.
这意味着在标准C中,你可以这样写:
static volatile sig_atomic_t sig_num = 0;
static void sig_handler(int signum)
{
signal(signum, sig_handler);
sig_num = signum;
}
除此之外就没什么了。
POSIX对于在信号处理程序中可以做的事情要宽容得多,但仍然存在限制(其中一个限制是标准I/O库- printf()等-不能安全地使用)。
我曾经在调试构建中使用过它,当编译器坚持要优化掉一个变量时,我希望在逐步执行代码时能够看到这个变量。