使用扩展方法:

public static class CommunicationObjectExtensions
{
    public static TResult MakeSafeServiceCall<TResult, TService>(this TService client, Func<TService, TResult> method) where TService : ICommunicationObject
    {
        TResult result;

        try
        {
            result = method(client);
        }
        finally
        {
            try
            {
                client.Close();
            }
            catch (CommunicationException)
            {
                client.Abort(); // Don't care about these exceptions. The call has completed anyway.
            }
            catch (TimeoutException)
            {
                client.Abort(); // Don't care about these exceptions. The call has completed anyway.
            }
            catch (Exception)
            {
                client.Abort();
                throw;
            }
        }

        return result;
    }
}

像这样的包装器可以工作:

public class ServiceClientWrapper<ServiceType> : IDisposable
{
    private ServiceType _channel;
    public ServiceType Channel
    {
        get { return _channel; }
    }

    private static ChannelFactory<ServiceType> _channelFactory;

    public ServiceClientWrapper()
    {
        if(_channelFactory == null)
             // Given that the endpoint name is the same as FullName of contract.
            _channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<ServiceType>(typeof(T).FullName);
        _channel = _channelFactory.CreateChannel();
        ((IChannel)_channel).Open();
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        try
        {
            ((IChannel)_channel).Close();
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            ((IChannel)_channel).Abort();
            // TODO: Insert logging
        }
    }
}

这应该使您能够编写如下代码:

ResponseType response = null;
using(var clientWrapper = new ServiceClientWrapper<IService>())
{
    var request = ...
    response = clientWrapper.Channel.MyServiceCall(request);
}
// Use your response object.

如果需要的话，包装器当然可以捕获更多的异常，但原理是一样的。

Given a choice between the solution advocated by IServiceOriented.com and the solution advocated by David Barret's blog, I prefer the simplicity offered by overriding the client's Dispose() method. This allows me to continue to use the using() statement as one would expect with a disposable object. However, as @Brian pointed out, this solution contains a race condition in that the State might not be faulted when it is checked but could be by the time Close() is called, in which case the CommunicationException still occurs.

因此，为了解决这个问题，我采用了一种混合了两种方法的解决方案。

void IDisposable.Dispose()
{
    bool success = false;
    try 
    {
        if (State != CommunicationState.Faulted) 
        {
            Close();
            success = true;
        }
    } 
    finally 
    {
        if (!success) 
            Abort();
    }
}

我的方法是创建一个显式实现IDisposable的继承类。这对于使用gui添加服务引用(添加服务引用)的人很有用。我只是在项目中删除这个类，使服务引用，并使用它而不是默认客户端:

using System;
using System.ServiceModel;
using MyApp.MyService; // The name you gave the service namespace

namespace MyApp.Helpers.Services
{
    public class MyServiceClientSafe : MyServiceClient, IDisposable
    {
        void IDisposable.Dispose()
        {
            if (State == CommunicationState.Faulted)
            {
                Abort();
            }
            else if (State != CommunicationState.Closed)
            {
                Close();
            }

            // Further error checks and disposal logic as desired..
        }
    }
}

注意:这只是dispose的一个简单实现，如果你喜欢，你可以实现更复杂的dispose逻辑。

然后你可以用安全客户端替换常规服务客户端的所有调用，如下所示:

using (MyServiceClientSafe client = new MyServiceClientSafe())
{
    var result = client.MyServiceMethod();
}

我喜欢这个解决方案，因为它不需要我访问接口定义，我可以使用using语句，因为我期望，同时允许我的代码看起来或多或少相同。

您仍然需要处理可以抛出的异常，正如在本线程的其他注释中指出的那样。

实际上，尽管我写了博客(见Luke的回答)，我认为这比我的IDisposable包装更好。典型的代码:

Service<IOrderService>.Use(orderService=>
{
  orderService.PlaceOrder(request);
}); 

(按评论编辑)

由于Use返回void，处理返回值的最简单方法是通过一个捕获的变量:

int newOrderId = 0; // need a value for definite assignment
Service<IOrderService>.Use(orderService=>
  {
    newOrderId = orderService.PlaceOrder(request);
  });
Console.WriteLine(newOrderId); // should be updated

您还可以使用DynamicProxy来扩展Dispose()方法。你可以这样做:

using (var wrapperdProxy = new Proxy<yourProxy>())
{
   // Do whatever and dispose of Proxy<yourProxy> will be called and work properly.
}