StringBuilder is probably preferable. The reason is that it allocates more space than currently needed (you set the number of characters) to leave room for future appends. Then those future appends that fit in the current buffer don't require any memory allocation or garbage collection, which can be expensive. In general, I use StringBuilder for complex string concatentation or multiple formatting, then convert to a normal String when the data is complete, and I want an immutable object again.

是的，StringBuilder在对字符串执行重复操作时提供了更好的性能。这是因为所有的更改都是对单个实例进行的，因此它可以节省大量时间，而不是像String那样创建一个新实例。

String Vs Stringbuilder

字符串 系统命名空间下 不可变(只读)实例 当价值发生持续变化时，性能下降 线程安全的 StringBuilder(可变字符串) 在系统。文本名称空间 可变的实例 显示更好的性能，因为对现有实例进行了新的更改

强烈推荐dotnet mob文章:c#中的String Vs StringBuilder。 相关堆栈溢出问题:字符串时的可变性 在c#中没有改变?

StringBuilder是可取的，如果你正在做多个循环，或分叉在你的代码传递…然而，对于PURE性能，如果你可以使用SINGLE字符串声明，那么性能就会更好。

例如:

string myString = "Some stuff" + var1 + " more stuff"
                  + var2 + " other stuff" .... etc... etc...;

更有表现力吗

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Append("Some Stuff");
sb.Append(var1);
sb.Append(" more stuff");
sb.Append(var2);
sb.Append("other stuff");
// etc.. etc.. etc..

在这种情况下，可以认为StringBuild更易于维护，但性能并不比单个字符串声明更好。

但是十有八九……使用字符串构建器。

另一方面:string + var也比string的性能更好。格式方法(通常)在内部使用StringBuilder(如果有疑问…检查反射器!)

StringBuilder is probably preferable. The reason is that it allocates more space than currently needed (you set the number of characters) to leave room for future appends. Then those future appends that fit in the current buffer don't require any memory allocation or garbage collection, which can be expensive. In general, I use StringBuilder for complex string concatentation or multiple formatting, then convert to a normal String when the data is complete, and I want an immutable object again.

我相信StringBuilder更快，如果你有超过4个字符串，你需要附加在一起。此外，它可以做一些很酷的事情，如AppendLine。

The performance of a concatenation operation for a String or StringBuilder object depends on how often a memory allocation occurs. A String concatenation operation always allocates memory, whereas a StringBuilder concatenation operation only allocates memory if the StringBuilder object buffer is too small to accommodate the new data. Consequently, the String class is preferable for a concatenation operation if a fixed number of String objects are concatenated. In that case, the individual concatenation operations might even be combined into a single operation by the compiler. A StringBuilder object is preferable for a concatenation operation if an arbitrary number of strings are concatenated; for example, if a loop concatenates a random number of strings of user input.

来源:MSDN