我理解String和StringBuilder之间的区别(StringBuilder是可变的),但两者之间有很大的性能差异吗?

我正在工作的程序有很多case驱动的字符串追加(500+)。使用StringBuilder是更好的选择吗?


当前回答

StringBuilder is probably preferable. The reason is that it allocates more space than currently needed (you set the number of characters) to leave room for future appends. Then those future appends that fit in the current buffer don't require any memory allocation or garbage collection, which can be expensive. In general, I use StringBuilder for complex string concatentation or multiple formatting, then convert to a normal String when the data is complete, and I want an immutable object again.

其他回答

是的,StringBuilder在对字符串执行重复操作时提供了更好的性能。这是因为所有的更改都是对单个实例进行的,因此它可以节省大量时间,而不是像String那样创建一个新实例。

String Vs Stringbuilder

字符串 系统命名空间下 不可变(只读)实例 当价值发生持续变化时,性能下降 线程安全的 StringBuilder(可变字符串) 在系统。文本名称空间 可变的实例 显示更好的性能,因为对现有实例进行了新的更改

强烈推荐dotnet mob文章:c#中的String Vs StringBuilder。 相关堆栈溢出问题:字符串时的可变性 在c#中没有改变?

String和StringBuilder实际上都是不可变的,StringBuilder内置了缓冲区,允许更有效地管理其大小。当StringBuilder需要调整大小时,就是在堆上重新分配它的时候。默认情况下,它的大小为16个字符,您可以在构造函数中设置此值。

eg.

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(50);

这个基准测试表明,当组合3个或更少字符串时,常规连接更快。

http://www.chinhdo.com/20070224/stringbuilder-is-not-always-faster/

StringBuilder可以在内存使用方面做出非常显著的改进,特别是在将500个字符串加在一起的情况下。

考虑下面的例子:

string buffer = "The numbers are: ";
for( int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
    buffer += i.ToString();
}
return buffer;

内存中发生了什么?创建以下字符串:

1 - "The numbers are: "
2 - "0"
3 - "The numbers are: 0"
4 - "1"
5 - "The numbers are: 01"
6 - "2"
7 - "The numbers are: 012"
8 - "3"
9 - "The numbers are: 0123"
10 - "4"
11 - "The numbers are: 01234"
12 - "5"
13 - "The numbers are: 012345"

通过将这5个数字加到字符串的末尾,我们创建了13个字符串对象!其中12个是无用的!哇!

StringBuilder fixes this problem. It is not a "mutable string" as we often hear (all strings in .NET are immutable). It works by keeping an internal buffer, an array of char. Calling Append() or AppendLine() adds the string to the empty space at the end of the char array; if the array is too small, it creates a new, larger array, and copies the buffer there. So in the example above, StringBuilder might only need a single array to contain all 5 additions to the string-- depending on the size of its buffer. You can tell StringBuilder how big its buffer should be in the constructor.

从内存的角度来看,StringBuilder的性能会更好。至于处理,执行时间的差异可以忽略不计。

StringBuilder更适合从许多非常量值构建字符串。

If you're building up a string from a lot of constant values, such as multiple lines of values in an HTML or XML document or other chunks of text, you can get away with just appending to the same string, because almost all compilers do "constant folding", a process of reducing the parse tree when you have a bunch of constant manipulation (it's also used when you write something like int minutesPerYear = 24 * 365 * 60). And for simple cases with non-constant values appended to each other, the .NET compiler will reduce your code to something similar to what StringBuilder does.

但是当你的append不能被编译器简化为更简单的东西时,你将需要一个StringBuilder。正如fizch所指出的,这更有可能发生在循环内部。