我理解String和StringBuilder之间的区别(StringBuilder是可变的),但两者之间有很大的性能差异吗?

我正在工作的程序有很多case驱动的字符串追加(500+)。使用StringBuilder是更好的选择吗?


当前回答

StringBuilder is probably preferable. The reason is that it allocates more space than currently needed (you set the number of characters) to leave room for future appends. Then those future appends that fit in the current buffer don't require any memory allocation or garbage collection, which can be expensive. In general, I use StringBuilder for complex string concatentation or multiple formatting, then convert to a normal String when the data is complete, and I want an immutable object again.

其他回答

字符串连接将花费更多。 在Java中,您可以根据需要使用StringBuffer或StringBuilder。 如果您想要一个同步的、线程安全的实现,请使用StringBuffer。这将比字符串连接更快。

如果你不需要同步的或者线程安全的实现,选择StringBuilder。 这将比String连接更快,也比StringBuffer更快,因为它们没有同步开销。

如果你要做很多字符串连接,使用StringBuilder。当您连接一个String时,每次都会创建一个新的String,这会占用更多的内存。

Alex

一个简单的例子来演示使用String连接和StringBuilder在速度上的差异:

System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch time = new Stopwatch();
string test = string.Empty;
time.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
    test += i;
}
time.Stop();
System.Console.WriteLine("Using String concatenation: " + time.ElapsedMilliseconds + " milliseconds");

结果:

使用字符串串联:15423毫秒

StringBuilder test1 = new StringBuilder();
time.Reset();
time.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
    test1.Append(i);
}
time.Stop();
System.Console.WriteLine("Using StringBuilder: " + time.ElapsedMilliseconds + " milliseconds");

结果:

使用StringBuilder: 10毫秒

结果,第一次迭代花费了15423毫秒,而使用StringBuilder的第二次迭代花费了10毫秒。

在我看来,使用StringBuilder更快,快得多。

从内存的角度来看,StringBuilder的性能会更好。至于处理,执行时间的差异可以忽略不计。

The performance of a concatenation operation for a String or StringBuilder object depends on how often a memory allocation occurs. A String concatenation operation always allocates memory, whereas a StringBuilder concatenation operation only allocates memory if the StringBuilder object buffer is too small to accommodate the new data. Consequently, the String class is preferable for a concatenation operation if a fixed number of String objects are concatenated. In that case, the individual concatenation operations might even be combined into a single operation by the compiler. A StringBuilder object is preferable for a concatenation operation if an arbitrary number of strings are concatenated; for example, if a loop concatenates a random number of strings of user input.

来源:MSDN