例如:
int a = 12;
cout << typeof(a) << endl;
预期的输出:
int
例如:
int a = 12;
cout << typeof(a) << endl;
预期的输出:
int
当前回答
#include <iostream>
#include <typeinfo>
using namespace std;
#define show_type_name(_t) \
system(("echo " + string(typeid(_t).name()) + " | c++filt -t").c_str())
int main() {
auto a = {"one", "two", "three"};
cout << "Type of a: " << typeid(a).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of a:\n";
show_type_name(a);
for (auto s : a) {
if (string(s) == "one") {
cout << "Type of s: " << typeid(s).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of s:\n";
show_type_name(s);
}
cout << s << endl;
}
int i = 5;
cout << "Type of i: " << typeid(i).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of i:\n";
show_type_name(i);
return 0;
}
输出:
Type of a: St16initializer_listIPKcE
Real type of a:
std::initializer_list<char const*>
Type of s: PKc
Real type of s:
char const*
one
two
three
Type of i: i
Real type of i:
int
其他回答
#include <iostream>
#include <typeinfo>
using namespace std;
#define show_type_name(_t) \
system(("echo " + string(typeid(_t).name()) + " | c++filt -t").c_str())
int main() {
auto a = {"one", "two", "three"};
cout << "Type of a: " << typeid(a).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of a:\n";
show_type_name(a);
for (auto s : a) {
if (string(s) == "one") {
cout << "Type of s: " << typeid(s).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of s:\n";
show_type_name(s);
}
cout << s << endl;
}
int i = 5;
cout << "Type of i: " << typeid(i).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of i:\n";
show_type_name(i);
return 0;
}
输出:
Type of a: St16initializer_listIPKcE
Real type of a:
std::initializer_list<char const*>
Type of s: PKc
Real type of s:
char const*
one
two
three
Type of i: i
Real type of i:
int
Try:
#include <typeinfo>
// …
std::cout << typeid(a).name() << '\n';
您可能必须在编译器选项中激活RTTI才能使其工作。此外,它的输出取决于编译器。它可能是一个原始类型名称或名称混乱符号或介于两者之间的任何东西。
非常丑陋,但如果你只想要编译时信息(例如调试):
auto testVar = std::make_tuple(1, 1.0, "abc");
decltype(testVar)::foo= 1;
返回:
Compilation finished with errors:
source.cpp: In function 'int main()':
source.cpp:5:19: error: 'foo' is not a member of 'std::tuple<int, double, const char*>'
根据Howard的解决方案,如果你不喜欢神奇的数字,我认为这是一种很好的表示方式,看起来很直观:
#include <string_view>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto type_name() {
std::string_view name, prefix, suffix;
#ifdef __clang__
name = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
prefix = "auto type_name() [T = ";
suffix = "]";
#elif defined(__GNUC__)
name = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
prefix = "constexpr auto type_name() [with T = ";
suffix = "]";
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
name = __FUNCSIG__;
prefix = "auto __cdecl type_name<";
suffix = ">(void)";
#endif
name.remove_prefix(prefix.size());
name.remove_suffix(suffix.size());
return name;
}
演示。
正如Scott Meyers在《Effective Modern c++》中所解释的那样,
对std::type_info::name的调用不能保证返回任何有意义的东西。
最好的解决方案是让编译器在类型推断期间生成错误消息,例如:
template<typename T>
class TD;
int main(){
const int theAnswer = 32;
auto x = theAnswer;
auto y = &theAnswer;
TD<decltype(x)> xType;
TD<decltype(y)> yType;
return 0;
}
根据不同的编译器,结果会是这样的:
test4.cpp:10:21: error: aggregate ‘TD<int> xType’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined TD<decltype(x)> xType;
test4.cpp:11:21: error: aggregate ‘TD<const int *> yType’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined TD<decltype(y)> yType;
因此,我们知道x的类型是int, y的类型是const int*