例如:
int a = 12;
cout << typeof(a) << endl;
预期的输出:
int
例如:
int a = 12;
cout << typeof(a) << endl;
预期的输出:
int
当前回答
在c++ 11中,我们有decltype。在标准c++中,没有办法显示使用decltype声明的变量的确切类型。我们可以使用boost typeindex,即type_id_with_cvr (cvr代表const, volatile, reference)来打印如下所示的类型。
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/type_index.hpp>
using namespace std;
using boost::typeindex::type_id_with_cvr;
int main() {
int i = 0;
const int ci = 0;
cout << "decltype(i) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype(i)>().pretty_name() << '\n';
cout << "decltype((i)) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype((i))>().pretty_name() << '\n';
cout << "decltype(ci) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype(ci)>().pretty_name() << '\n';
cout << "decltype((ci)) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype((ci))>().pretty_name() << '\n';
cout << "decltype(std::move(i)) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype(std::move(i))>().pretty_name() << '\n';
cout << "decltype(std::static_cast<int&&>(i)) is " << type_id_with_cvr<decltype(static_cast<int&&>(i))>().pretty_name() << '\n';
return 0;
}
其他回答
#include <iostream>
#include <typeinfo>
using namespace std;
#define show_type_name(_t) \
system(("echo " + string(typeid(_t).name()) + " | c++filt -t").c_str())
int main() {
auto a = {"one", "two", "three"};
cout << "Type of a: " << typeid(a).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of a:\n";
show_type_name(a);
for (auto s : a) {
if (string(s) == "one") {
cout << "Type of s: " << typeid(s).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of s:\n";
show_type_name(s);
}
cout << s << endl;
}
int i = 5;
cout << "Type of i: " << typeid(i).name() << endl;
cout << "Real type of i:\n";
show_type_name(i);
return 0;
}
输出:
Type of a: St16initializer_listIPKcE
Real type of a:
std::initializer_list<char const*>
Type of s: PKc
Real type of s:
char const*
one
two
three
Type of i: i
Real type of i:
int
c++ 11更新到一个非常老的问题:在c++中打印变量类型。
公认的(好的)答案是使用typeid(a).name(),其中a是变量名。
现在在c++ 11中,我们有了decltype(x),它可以将表达式转换为类型。decltype()有自己的一组非常有趣的规则。例如,decltype(a)和decltype((a))通常是不同的类型(一旦这些原因暴露出来,就会出现良好且可理解的原因)。
我们可信的类型id(a).name()能帮助我们探索这个美丽的新世界吗?
No.
但是这个工具并不复杂。我就是用这个工具来回答这个问题的。我将比较这个新工具与typeid(a).name()。这个新工具实际上构建在typeid(a).name()之上。
根本问题是:
typeid(a).name()
丢弃cv限定符、引用和左值/右值。例如:
const int ci = 0;
std::cout << typeid(ci).name() << '\n';
对于我输出:
i
我猜MSVC的输出:
int
即const消失了。这不是QOI(实施质量)问题。标准要求这种行为。
以下是我的建议:
template <typename T> std::string type_name();
可以这样使用:
const int ci = 0;
std::cout << type_name<decltype(ci)>() << '\n';
对我来说输出:
int const
我还没有在MSVC上测试过这个。但是我欢迎那些喜欢的人给我反馈。
c++ 11解决方案
我对非msvc平台使用__cxa_demangle,这是ipapadop在他对demangle类型的回答中推荐的。但是在MSVC上,我相信typeid需要名称(未经测试)。这个核心包含一些简单的测试,用于检测、恢复和报告cv限定符和对输入类型的引用。
#include <type_traits>
#include <typeinfo>
#ifndef _MSC_VER
# include <cxxabi.h>
#endif
#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
template <class T>
std::string
type_name()
{
typedef typename std::remove_reference<T>::type TR;
std::unique_ptr<char, void(*)(void*)> own
(
#ifndef _MSC_VER
abi::__cxa_demangle(typeid(TR).name(), nullptr,
nullptr, nullptr),
#else
nullptr,
#endif
std::free
);
std::string r = own != nullptr ? own.get() : typeid(TR).name();
if (std::is_const<TR>::value)
r += " const";
if (std::is_volatile<TR>::value)
r += " volatile";
if (std::is_lvalue_reference<T>::value)
r += "&";
else if (std::is_rvalue_reference<T>::value)
r += "&&";
return r;
}
结果
有了这个解决方案,我可以这样做:
int& foo_lref();
int&& foo_rref();
int foo_value();
int
main()
{
int i = 0;
const int ci = 0;
std::cout << "decltype(i) is " << type_name<decltype(i)>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype((i)) is " << type_name<decltype((i))>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(ci) is " << type_name<decltype(ci)>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype((ci)) is " << type_name<decltype((ci))>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(static_cast<int&>(i)) is " << type_name<decltype(static_cast<int&>(i))>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(static_cast<int&&>(i)) is " << type_name<decltype(static_cast<int&&>(i))>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(static_cast<int>(i)) is " << type_name<decltype(static_cast<int>(i))>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(foo_lref()) is " << type_name<decltype(foo_lref())>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(foo_rref()) is " << type_name<decltype(foo_rref())>() << '\n';
std::cout << "decltype(foo_value()) is " << type_name<decltype(foo_value())>() << '\n';
}
输出为:
decltype(i) is int
decltype((i)) is int&
decltype(ci) is int const
decltype((ci)) is int const&
decltype(static_cast<int&>(i)) is int&
decltype(static_cast<int&&>(i)) is int&&
decltype(static_cast<int>(i)) is int
decltype(foo_lref()) is int&
decltype(foo_rref()) is int&&
decltype(foo_value()) is int
注意(例如)decltype(i)和decltype((i))之间的区别。前者是i声明的类型,后者是表达式i的“类型”(表达式从来没有引用类型,但按照惯例,decltype表示带有左值引用的左值表达式)。
因此,除了探索和调试自己的代码之外,这个工具还是学习decltype的绝佳工具。
相比之下,如果我只是在typeid(a).name()上构建这个,而不添加回丢失的cv-qualifiers或引用,输出将是:
decltype(i) is int
decltype((i)) is int
decltype(ci) is int
decltype((ci)) is int
decltype(static_cast<int&>(i)) is int
decltype(static_cast<int&&>(i)) is int
decltype(static_cast<int>(i)) is int
decltype(foo_lref()) is int
decltype(foo_rref()) is int
decltype(foo_value()) is int
也就是说,所有的引用和简历修饰符都被剥离了。
c++ 14更新
就在你认为自己已经找到了解决问题的办法时,总会有人不知从哪里冒出来,给你展示一个更好的方法。: -)
这个来自Jamboree的回答展示了如何在编译时在c++ 14中获取类型名。这是一个出色的解决方案,原因如下:
它在编译时! 你让编译器本身来做这项工作,而不是一个库(甚至是std::lib)。这意味着对于最新的语言特性(如lambdas)会得到更准确的结果。
Jamboree的答案并没有完全为VS铺开一切,我稍微调整了一下他的代码。但由于这个答案获得了很多点击量,花点时间去那里为他的答案投票,如果没有投票,这个更新就不会发生。
#include <cstddef>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <cstring>
#include <ostream>
#ifndef _MSC_VER
# if __cplusplus < 201103
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN
# define NOEXCEPT_TN
# elif __cplusplus < 201402
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN constexpr
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN
# define NOEXCEPT_TN noexcept
# else
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN constexpr
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN constexpr
# define NOEXCEPT_TN noexcept
# endif
#else // _MSC_VER
# if _MSC_VER < 1900
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN
# define NOEXCEPT_TN
# elif _MSC_VER < 2000
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN constexpr
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN
# define NOEXCEPT_TN noexcept
# else
# define CONSTEXPR11_TN constexpr
# define CONSTEXPR14_TN constexpr
# define NOEXCEPT_TN noexcept
# endif
#endif // _MSC_VER
class static_string
{
const char* const p_;
const std::size_t sz_;
public:
typedef const char* const_iterator;
template <std::size_t N>
CONSTEXPR11_TN static_string(const char(&a)[N]) NOEXCEPT_TN
: p_(a)
, sz_(N-1)
{}
CONSTEXPR11_TN static_string(const char* p, std::size_t N) NOEXCEPT_TN
: p_(p)
, sz_(N)
{}
CONSTEXPR11_TN const char* data() const NOEXCEPT_TN {return p_;}
CONSTEXPR11_TN std::size_t size() const NOEXCEPT_TN {return sz_;}
CONSTEXPR11_TN const_iterator begin() const NOEXCEPT_TN {return p_;}
CONSTEXPR11_TN const_iterator end() const NOEXCEPT_TN {return p_ + sz_;}
CONSTEXPR11_TN char operator[](std::size_t n) const
{
return n < sz_ ? p_[n] : throw std::out_of_range("static_string");
}
};
inline
std::ostream&
operator<<(std::ostream& os, static_string const& s)
{
return os.write(s.data(), s.size());
}
template <class T>
CONSTEXPR14_TN
static_string
type_name()
{
#ifdef __clang__
static_string p = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
return static_string(p.data() + 31, p.size() - 31 - 1);
#elif defined(__GNUC__)
static_string p = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
# if __cplusplus < 201402
return static_string(p.data() + 36, p.size() - 36 - 1);
# else
return static_string(p.data() + 46, p.size() - 46 - 1);
# endif
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
static_string p = __FUNCSIG__;
return static_string(p.data() + 38, p.size() - 38 - 7);
#endif
}
如果你仍然停留在古老的c++ 11中,这段代码将在constexpr上自动后退。如果你用c++ 98/03在洞穴墙壁上作画,noexcept也会被牺牲掉。
c++ 17更新
在下面的评论中,Lyberta指出新的std::string_view可以取代static_string:
template <class T>
constexpr
std::string_view
type_name()
{
using namespace std;
#ifdef __clang__
string_view p = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
return string_view(p.data() + 34, p.size() - 34 - 1);
#elif defined(__GNUC__)
string_view p = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
# if __cplusplus < 201402
return string_view(p.data() + 36, p.size() - 36 - 1);
# else
return string_view(p.data() + 49, p.find(';', 49) - 49);
# endif
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
string_view p = __FUNCSIG__;
return string_view(p.data() + 84, p.size() - 84 - 7);
#endif
}
我已经更新了VS的常数,这要感谢Jive Dadson在下面的评论中非常好的侦探工作。
更新:
一定要看看这个重写或下面这个重写,它消除了我最新公式中不可读的神奇数字。
当我提出挑战时,我决定测试一下与平台无关的模板技巧能走多远。
名称在编译时完全组装。(这意味着不能使用typeid(T).name(),因此必须显式地为非复合类型提供名称。否则将显示占位符。)
使用示例:
TYPE_NAME(int)
TYPE_NAME(void)
// You probably should list all primitive types here.
TYPE_NAME(std::string)
int main()
{
// A simple case
std::cout << type_name<void(*)(int)> << '\n';
// -> `void (*)(int)`
// Ugly mess case
// Note that compiler removes cv-qualifiers from parameters and replaces arrays with pointers.
std::cout << type_name<void (std::string::*(int[3],const int, void (*)(std::string)))(volatile int*const*)> << '\n';
// -> `void (std::string::*(int *,int,void (*)(std::string)))(volatile int *const*)`
// A case with undefined types
// If a type wasn't TYPE_NAME'd, it's replaced by a placeholder, one of `class?`, `union?`, `enum?` or `??`.
std::cout << type_name<std::ostream (*)(int, short)> << '\n';
// -> `class? (*)(int,??)`
// With appropriate TYPE_NAME's, the output would be `std::string (*)(int,short)`.
}
代码:
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
static constexpr std::size_t max_str_lit_len = 256;
template <std::size_t I, std::size_t N> constexpr char sl_at(const char (&str)[N])
{
if constexpr(I < N)
return str[I];
else
return '\0';
}
constexpr std::size_t sl_len(const char *str)
{
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < max_str_lit_len; i++)
if (str[i] == '\0')
return i;
return 0;
}
template <char ...C> struct str_lit
{
static constexpr char value[] {C..., '\0'};
static constexpr int size = sl_len(value);
template <typename F, typename ...P> struct concat_impl {using type = typename concat_impl<F>::type::template concat_impl<P...>::type;};
template <char ...CC> struct concat_impl<str_lit<CC...>> {using type = str_lit<C..., CC...>;};
template <typename ...P> using concat = typename concat_impl<P...>::type;
};
template <typename, const char *> struct trim_str_lit_impl;
template <std::size_t ...I, const char *S> struct trim_str_lit_impl<std::index_sequence<I...>, S>
{
using type = str_lit<S[I]...>;
};
template <std::size_t N, const char *S> using trim_str_lit = typename trim_str_lit_impl<std::make_index_sequence<N>, S>::type;
#define STR_LIT(str) ::trim_str_lit<::sl_len(str), ::str_lit<STR_TO_VA(str)>::value>
#define STR_TO_VA(str) STR_TO_VA_16(str,0),STR_TO_VA_16(str,16),STR_TO_VA_16(str,32),STR_TO_VA_16(str,48)
#define STR_TO_VA_16(str,off) STR_TO_VA_4(str,0+off),STR_TO_VA_4(str,4+off),STR_TO_VA_4(str,8+off),STR_TO_VA_4(str,12+off)
#define STR_TO_VA_4(str,off) ::sl_at<off+0>(str),::sl_at<off+1>(str),::sl_at<off+2>(str),::sl_at<off+3>(str)
template <char ...C> constexpr str_lit<C...> make_str_lit(str_lit<C...>) {return {};}
template <std::size_t N> constexpr auto make_str_lit(const char (&str)[N])
{
return trim_str_lit<sl_len((const char (&)[N])str), str>{};
}
template <std::size_t A, std::size_t B> struct cexpr_pow {static constexpr std::size_t value = A * cexpr_pow<A,B-1>::value;};
template <std::size_t A> struct cexpr_pow<A,0> {static constexpr std::size_t value = 1;};
template <std::size_t N, std::size_t X, typename = std::make_index_sequence<X>> struct num_to_str_lit_impl;
template <std::size_t N, std::size_t X, std::size_t ...Seq> struct num_to_str_lit_impl<N, X, std::index_sequence<Seq...>>
{
static constexpr auto func()
{
if constexpr (N >= cexpr_pow<10,X>::value)
return num_to_str_lit_impl<N, X+1>::func();
else
return str_lit<(N / cexpr_pow<10,X-1-Seq>::value % 10 + '0')...>{};
}
};
template <std::size_t N> using num_to_str_lit = decltype(num_to_str_lit_impl<N,1>::func());
using spa = str_lit<' '>;
using lpa = str_lit<'('>;
using rpa = str_lit<')'>;
using lbr = str_lit<'['>;
using rbr = str_lit<']'>;
using ast = str_lit<'*'>;
using amp = str_lit<'&'>;
using con = str_lit<'c','o','n','s','t'>;
using vol = str_lit<'v','o','l','a','t','i','l','e'>;
using con_vol = con::concat<spa, vol>;
using nsp = str_lit<':',':'>;
using com = str_lit<','>;
using unk = str_lit<'?','?'>;
using c_cla = str_lit<'c','l','a','s','s','?'>;
using c_uni = str_lit<'u','n','i','o','n','?'>;
using c_enu = str_lit<'e','n','u','m','?'>;
template <typename T> inline constexpr bool ptr_or_ref = std::is_pointer_v<T> || std::is_reference_v<T> || std::is_member_pointer_v<T>;
template <typename T> inline constexpr bool func_or_arr = std::is_function_v<T> || std::is_array_v<T>;
template <typename T> struct primitive_type_name {using value = unk;};
template <typename T, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_class_v<T>>> using enable_if_class = T;
template <typename T, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_union_v<T>>> using enable_if_union = T;
template <typename T, typename = std::enable_if_t<std::is_enum_v <T>>> using enable_if_enum = T;
template <typename T> struct primitive_type_name<enable_if_class<T>> {using value = c_cla;};
template <typename T> struct primitive_type_name<enable_if_union<T>> {using value = c_uni;};
template <typename T> struct primitive_type_name<enable_if_enum <T>> {using value = c_enu;};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl;
template <typename T> using type_name_lit = std::conditional_t<std::is_same_v<typename primitive_type_name<T>::value::template concat<spa>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>>,
typename primitive_type_name<T>::value,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>>;
template <typename T> inline constexpr const char *type_name = type_name_lit<T>::value;
template <typename T, typename = std::enable_if_t<!std::is_const_v<T> && !std::is_volatile_v<T>>> using enable_if_no_cv = T;
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl
{
using l = typename primitive_type_name<T>::value::template concat<spa>;
using r = str_lit<>;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<const T>
{
using new_T_l = std::conditional_t<type_name_impl<T>::l::size && !ptr_or_ref<T>,
spa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::l>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l>;
using l = std::conditional_t<ptr_or_ref<T>,
typename new_T_l::template concat<con>,
con::concat<new_T_l>>;
using r = typename type_name_impl<T>::r;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<volatile T>
{
using new_T_l = std::conditional_t<type_name_impl<T>::l::size && !ptr_or_ref<T>,
spa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::l>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l>;
using l = std::conditional_t<ptr_or_ref<T>,
typename new_T_l::template concat<vol>,
vol::concat<new_T_l>>;
using r = typename type_name_impl<T>::r;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<const volatile T>
{
using new_T_l = std::conditional_t<type_name_impl<T>::l::size && !ptr_or_ref<T>,
spa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::l>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l>;
using l = std::conditional_t<ptr_or_ref<T>,
typename new_T_l::template concat<con_vol>,
con_vol::concat<new_T_l>>;
using r = typename type_name_impl<T>::r;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<T *>
{
using l = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<lpa, ast>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat< ast>>;
using r = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
rpa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<T &>
{
using l = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<lpa, amp>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat< amp>>;
using r = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
rpa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<T &&>
{
using l = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<lpa, amp, amp>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat< amp, amp>>;
using r = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
rpa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T, typename C> struct type_name_impl<T C::*>
{
using l = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat<lpa, type_name_lit<C>, nsp, ast>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::l::template concat< type_name_lit<C>, nsp, ast>>;
using r = std::conditional_t<func_or_arr<T>,
rpa::concat<typename type_name_impl<T>::r>,
typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<enable_if_no_cv<T[]>>
{
using l = typename type_name_impl<T>::l;
using r = lbr::concat<rbr, typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T, std::size_t N> struct type_name_impl<enable_if_no_cv<T[N]>>
{
using l = typename type_name_impl<T>::l;
using r = lbr::concat<num_to_str_lit<N>, rbr, typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T> struct type_name_impl<T()>
{
using l = typename type_name_impl<T>::l;
using r = lpa::concat<rpa, typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
template <typename T, typename P1, typename ...P> struct type_name_impl<T(P1, P...)>
{
using l = typename type_name_impl<T>::l;
using r = lpa::concat<type_name_lit<P1>,
com::concat<type_name_lit<P>>..., rpa, typename type_name_impl<T>::r>;
};
#define TYPE_NAME(t) template <> struct primitive_type_name<t> {using value = STR_LIT(#t);};
考虑下面的代码:
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int a = 2; // Declare type "int"
std::string b = "Hi"; // Declare type "string"
long double c = 3438; // Declare type "long double"
if(typeid(a) == typeid(int))
{
std::cout<<"int\n";
}
if(typeid(b) == typeid(std::string))
{
std::cout<<"string\n";
}
if(typeid(c) == typeid(long double))
{
std::cout<<"long double";
}
return 0;
}
我相信你想要整个单词(而不是只打印int的缩写形式(即I),你想要int),这就是为什么我做了if。
对于一些变量(字符串,long double等…)比较它们的简写形式不会输出预期的结果),您需要将应用typeid操作符的结果与特定类型的typeid进行比较。
从cppreference:
返回一个实现定义的以空结束的字符串,包含类型的名称。不提供任何保证;特别地,返回的字符串对于多个类型是相同的,并且在同一个程序的调用之间会发生变化。
在我看来,Python在这种情况下比c++更好。Python有内置的type函数,可以直接访问变量的数据类型。
根据Howard的解决方案,如果你不喜欢神奇的数字,我认为这是一种很好的表示方式,看起来很直观:
#include <string_view>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto type_name() {
std::string_view name, prefix, suffix;
#ifdef __clang__
name = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
prefix = "auto type_name() [T = ";
suffix = "]";
#elif defined(__GNUC__)
name = __PRETTY_FUNCTION__;
prefix = "constexpr auto type_name() [with T = ";
suffix = "]";
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
name = __FUNCSIG__;
prefix = "auto __cdecl type_name<";
suffix = ">(void)";
#endif
name.remove_prefix(prefix.size());
name.remove_suffix(suffix.size());
return name;
}
演示。