以此为本,以此为本,以此为本,以此为本,以此为本,以此为本,以此为本。


如果您的列表来自列表理解,问题可以通过纠正理解更简单/直接解决;请参见Python列表理解;压缩列表?

在这里,最受欢迎的解决方案通常只包含一个“层”的清单。 查看清单不规则(自愿清单)的清单,解决方案完全清单一个深度清单的结构(重复,一般)。


当前回答

使用 functools.reduce,将积累的列表 xs 添加到下列列表 ys:

from functools import reduce
xss = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7], [8,9]]
out = reduce(lambda xs, ys: xs + ys, xss)

出口:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

使用 operator.concat 的更快方法:

from functools import reduce
import operator
xss = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7], [8,9]]
out = reduce(operator.concat, xss)

出口:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

其他回答

如果你有一个Numpy Array A:

a = np.array([[1,2], [3,4]])
a.flatten('C')

生产:

[1, 2, 3, 4]

np.flatten 也接受其他参数:

C: F A K

有关参数的详细信息可在这里找到。

matplotlib.cbook.flatten() 将为粘贴列表工作,即使它们比示例更深地粘贴。

import matplotlib
l = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7], [8, 9]]
print(list(matplotlib.cbook.flatten(l)))
l2 = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7], [8, [9, 10, [11, 12, [13]]]]]
print(list(matplotlib.cbook.flatten(l2)))

结果:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]

这比 underscore 快 18 倍。

Average time over 1000 trials of matplotlib.cbook.flatten: 2.55e-05 sec
Average time over 1000 trials of underscore._.flatten: 4.63e-04 sec
(time for underscore._)/(time for matplotlib.cbook) = 18.1233394636

你可以使用列表扩展方法. 它显示是最快的:

flat_list = []
for sublist in l:
    flat_list.extend(sublist)

表演:

import functools
import itertools
import numpy
import operator
import perfplot


def functools_reduce_iconcat(a):
    return functools.reduce(operator.iconcat, a, [])


def itertools_chain(a):
    return list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(a))


def numpy_flat(a):
    return list(numpy.array(a).flat)


def extend(a):
    n = []

    list(map(n.extend, a))

    return n


perfplot.show(
    setup = lambda n: [list(range(10))] * n,
    kernels = [
        functools_reduce_iconcat, extend, itertools_chain, numpy_flat
        ],
    n_range = [2**k for k in range(16)],
    xlabel = 'num lists',
    )

出口:

此分類上一篇

使用 functools.reduce,将积累的列表 xs 添加到下列列表 ys:

from functools import reduce
xss = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7], [8,9]]
out = reduce(lambda xs, ys: xs + ys, xss)

出口:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

使用 operator.concat 的更快方法:

from functools import reduce
import operator
xss = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7], [8,9]]
out = reduce(operator.concat, xss)

出口:

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

对于包含多个列表的列表,这里是一个重复的解决方案,为我工作,我希望它是正确的:

# Question 4
def flatten(input_ls=[]) -> []:
    res_ls = []
    res_ls = flatten_recursive(input_ls, res_ls)

    print("Final flatten list solution is: \n", res_ls)

    return res_ls


def flatten_recursive(input_ls=[], res_ls=[]) -> []:
    tmp_ls = []

    for i in input_ls:
        if isinstance(i, int):
            res_ls.append(i)
        else:
            tmp_ls = i
            tmp_ls.append(flatten_recursive(i, res_ls))

    print(res_ls)
    return res_ls


flatten([0, 1, [2, 3], 4, [5, 6]])  # test
flatten([0, [[[1]]], [[2, 3], [4, [[5, 6]]]]])

出口:

[0, 1, 2, 3]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Final flatten list solution is: 
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1]
[0, 1]
[0, 1]
[0, 1, 2, 3]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Final flatten list solution is: 
 [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]