这不是一个很难的事情，我看到上面的答案，他们中的大多数在“列表”中有一个性能问题

这段代码比上面的代码快得多

import json 

class jsonify:
    def __init__(self, data):
        self.jsonify = data

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        value = self.jsonify.get(attr)
        if isinstance(value, (list, dict)):
            return jsonify(value)
        return value

    def __getitem__(self, index):
        value = self.jsonify[index]
        if isinstance(value, (list, dict)):
            return jsonify(value)
        return value

    def __setitem__(self, index, value):
        self.jsonify[index] = value

    def __delattr__(self, index):
        self.jsonify.pop(index)

    def __delitem__(self, index):
        self.jsonify.pop(index)

    def __repr__(self):
        return json.dumps(self.jsonify, indent=2, default=lambda x: str(x))

exmaple

response = jsonify(
    {
        'test': {
            'test1': [{'ok': 1}]
        }
    }
)
response.test -> jsonify({'test1': [{'ok': 1}]})
response.test.test1 -> jsonify([{'ok': 1}])
response.test.test1[0] -> jsonify({'ok': 1})
response.test.test1[0].ok -> int(1)

如果你正在使用python 3.6+，你可以使用棉花糖-数据类。与上面列出的所有解决方案相反，它既简单，又类型安全:

from marshmallow_dataclass import dataclass

@dataclass
class User:
    name: str

user = User.Schema().load({"name": "Ramirez"})

在寻找解决方案时，我偶然发现了这个博客:https://blog.mosthege.net/2016/11/12/json-deserialization-of-nested-objects/

它使用与前面回答中相同的技术，但使用了装饰器。 我发现另一件有用的事情是，它在反序列化结束时返回一个类型化对象

class JsonConvert(object):
    class_mappings = {}

    @classmethod
    def class_mapper(cls, d):
        for keys, cls in clsself.mappings.items():
            if keys.issuperset(d.keys()):   # are all required arguments present?
                return cls(**d)
        else:
            # Raise exception instead of silently returning None
            raise ValueError('Unable to find a matching class for object: {!s}'.format(d))

    @classmethod
    def complex_handler(cls, Obj):
        if hasattr(Obj, '__dict__'):
            return Obj.__dict__
        else:
            raise TypeError('Object of type %s with value of %s is not JSON serializable' % (type(Obj), repr(Obj)))

    @classmethod
    def register(cls, claz):
        clsself.mappings[frozenset(tuple([attr for attr,val in cls().__dict__.items()]))] = cls
        return cls

    @classmethod
    def to_json(cls, obj):
        return json.dumps(obj.__dict__, default=cls.complex_handler, indent=4)

    @classmethod
    def from_json(cls, json_str):
        return json.loads(json_str, object_hook=cls.class_mapper)

用法:

@JsonConvert.register
class Employee(object):
    def __init__(self, Name:int=None, Age:int=None):
        self.Name = Name
        self.Age = Age
        return

@JsonConvert.register
class Company(object):
    def __init__(self, Name:str="", Employees:[Employee]=None):
        self.Name = Name
        self.Employees = [] if Employees is None else Employees
        return

company = Company("Contonso")
company.Employees.append(Employee("Werner", 38))
company.Employees.append(Employee("Mary"))

as_json = JsonConvert.to_json(company)
from_json = JsonConvert.from_json(as_json)
as_json_from_json = JsonConvert.to_json(from_json)

assert(as_json_from_json == as_json)

print(as_json_from_json)

扩展一下DS的答案，如果你需要对象是可变的(而namedtuple不是)，你可以使用记录类库而不是namedtuple:

import json
from recordclass import recordclass

data = '{"name": "John Smith", "hometown": {"name": "New York", "id": 123}}'

# Parse into a mutable object
x = json.loads(data, object_hook=lambda d: recordclass('X', d.keys())(*d.values()))

修改后的对象可以使用simplejson很容易地转换回json:

x.name = "John Doe"
new_json = simplejson.dumps(x)

修改@DS响应位，从一个文件加载:

def _json_object_hook(d): return namedtuple('X', d.keys())(*d.values())
def load_data(file_name):
  with open(file_name, 'r') as file_data:
    return file_data.read().replace('\n', '')
def json2obj(file_name): return json.loads(load_data(file_name), object_hook=_json_object_hook)

有一点:它不能加载前面有数字的项目。是这样的:

{
  "1_first_item": {
    "A": "1",
    "B": "2"
  }
}

因为“1_first_item”不是一个有效的python字段名。

我正在寻找一个与recordclass一起工作的解决方案。RecordClass，支持嵌套对象，可用于json序列化和json反序列化。

扩展DS的答案，扩展BeneStr的解决方案，我想出了以下似乎有效的方法:

代码:

import json
import recordclass

class NestedRec(recordclass.RecordClass):
    a : int = 0
    b : int = 0

class ExampleRec(recordclass.RecordClass):
    x : int       = None
    y : int       = None
    nested : NestedRec = NestedRec()

class JsonSerializer:
    @staticmethod
    def dumps(obj, ensure_ascii=True, indent=None, sort_keys=False):
        return json.dumps(obj, default=JsonSerializer.__obj_to_dict, ensure_ascii=ensure_ascii, indent=indent, sort_keys=sort_keys)

    @staticmethod
    def loads(s, klass):
        return JsonSerializer.__dict_to_obj(klass, json.loads(s))

    @staticmethod
    def __obj_to_dict(obj):
        if hasattr(obj, "_asdict"):
            return obj._asdict()
        else:
            return json.JSONEncoder().default(obj)

    @staticmethod
    def __dict_to_obj(klass, s_dict):
        kwargs = {
            key : JsonSerializer.__dict_to_obj(cls, s_dict[key]) if hasattr(cls,'_asdict') else s_dict[key] \
                for key,cls in klass.__annotations__.items() \
                    if s_dict is not None and key in s_dict
        }
        return klass(**kwargs)

用法:

example_0 = ExampleRec(x = 10, y = 20, nested = NestedRec( a = 30, b = 40 ) )

#Serialize to JSON

json_str = JsonSerializer.dumps(example_0)
print(json_str)
#{
#  "x": 10,
#  "y": 20,
#  "nested": {
#    "a": 30,
#    "b": 40
#  }
#}

# Deserialize from JSON
example_1 = JsonSerializer.loads(json_str, ExampleRec)
example_1.x += 1
example_1.y += 1
example_1.nested.a += 1
example_1.nested.b += 1

json_str = JsonSerializer.dumps(example_1)
print(json_str)
#{
#  "x": 11,
#  "y": 21,
#  "nested": {
#    "a": 31,
#    "b": 41
#  }
#}