如果使用create-react-app，文档中解释了一个更简单和直接的解决方案。

创建src/setupTests.js，并把这个放在里面:

const localStorageMock = {
  getItem: jest.fn(),
  setItem: jest.fn(),
  clear: jest.fn()
};
global.localStorage = localStorageMock;

Tom Mertz的评论如下:

然后，您可以通过执行以下操作来测试localStorageMock的函数是否被使用

expect(localStorage.getItem).toBeCalledWith('token')
// or
expect(localStorage.getItem.mock.calls.length).toBe(1)

在你的测试中，如果你想确保它被调用。查看https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/mock-functions.html

首先，我创建了一个名为localStorage.ts(localStorage.js)的文件

class LocalStorageMock {
  store: Store;
  length: number;

  constructor() {
    this.store = {};
    this.length = 0;
  }

  key(n: number): any {
    if (typeof n === 'undefined') {
      throw new Error(
        "Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'key' on 'Storage': 1 argument required, but only 0 present."
      );
    }

    if (n >= Object.keys(this.store).length) {
      return null;
    }

    return Object.keys(this.store)[n];
  }

  getItem(key: string): Store | null {
    if (!Object.keys(this.store).includes(key)) {
      return null;
    }

    return this.store[key];
  }

  setItem(key: string, value: any): undefined {
    if (typeof key === 'undefined' && typeof value === 'undefined') {
      throw new Error(
        "Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'setItem' on 'Storage': 2 arguments required, but only 0 present."
      );
    }

    if (typeof value === 'undefined') {
      throw new Error(
        "Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'setItem' on 'Storage': 2 arguments required, but only 1 present."
      );
    }

    if (!key) return undefined;

    this.store[key] = value.toString() || '';
    this.length = Object.keys(this.store).length;

    return undefined;
  }

  removeItem(key: string): undefined {
    if (typeof key === 'undefined') {
      throw new Error(
        "Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'removeItem' on 'Storage': 1 argument required, but only 0 present."
      );
    }

    delete this.store[key];
    this.length = Object.keys(this.store).length;
    return undefined;
  }

  clear(): undefined {
    this.store = {};
    this.length = 0;

    return undefined;
  }
}

export const getLocalStorageMock = (): any => {
  return new LocalStorageMock();
};

global.localStorage = new LocalStorageMock();

然后创建名为session.test.ts的测试文件(session.test.js)

import { getLocalStorageMock } from '../localstorage';
describe('session storage', () => {
  let localStorage;
  beforeEach(() => {
    localStorage = getLocalStorageMock();
  });

  describe('getItem', () => {
    it('should return null if the item is undefined', () => {
      expect(localStorage.getItem('item')).toBeNull();
    });
    it("should return '' instead of null", () => {
      localStorage.setItem('item', '');
      expect(localStorage.getItem('item')).toBe('');
    });
    it('should return navid', () => {
      localStorage.setItem('item', 'navid');
      expect(localStorage.getItem('item')).toBe('navid');
    });

  });
});

不幸的是，我在这里找到的解决方案对我不起作用。

所以我在看Jest GitHub的问题，发现了这个帖子

得到最多好评的解决方案是:

const spy = jest.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem');

// or

Storage.prototype.getItem = jest.fn(() => 'bla');

正如@ck4所建议的那样，文档已经清楚地解释了如何使用localStorage。然而，模拟函数无法执行任何localStorage方法。

下面是我的react组件的详细示例，它使用抽象方法来写入和读取数据，

//file: storage.js
const key = 'ABC';
export function readFromStore (){
    return JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem(key));
}
export function saveToStore (value) {
    localStorage.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(value));
}

export default { readFromStore, saveToStore };

错误:

TypeError: _setupLocalStorage2.default.setItem is not a function

解决办法: 为jest添加以下mock函数(路径:.jest/mocks/setUpStore.js)

let mockStorage = {};

module.exports = window.localStorage = {
  setItem: (key, val) => Object.assign(mockStorage, {[key]: val}),
  getItem: (key) => mockStorage[key],
  clear: () => mockStorage = {}
};

Snippet从这里引用

这对我很有效，

delete global.localStorage;
global.localStorage = {
getItem: () => 
 }

或者你只是像这样使用一个模拟包:

https://www.npmjs.com/package/jest-localstorage-mock

它不仅处理存储功能，还允许您测试是否实际调用了存储。