在Jest测试中,我一直得到“localStorage is not defined”,这是有意义的,但我的选项是什么?碰壁。


当前回答

对于Jest, React和TypeScript用户:

我创建了一个mockLocalStorage.ts

export const mockLocalStorage = () => {
  const setItemMock = jest.fn();
  const getItemMock = jest.fn();

  beforeEach(() => {
    Storage.prototype.setItem = setItemMock;
    Storage.prototype.getItem = getItemMock;
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    setItemMock.mockRestore();
    getItemMock.mockRestore();
  });

  return { setItemMock, getItemMock };
};

我的组件:

export const Component = () => {
    const foo = localStorage.getItem('foo')
    localStorage.setItem('bar', 'true')
    return <h1>{foo}</h1>
}

然后在我的测试中,我这样使用它:

import React from 'react';

import { mockLocalStorage } from '../../test-utils';
import { Component } from './Component';

const { getItemMock, setItemMock } = mockLocalStorage();

it('fetches something from localStorage', () => {
    getItemMock.mockReturnValue('bar');
    render(<Component />);
    expect(getItemMock).toHaveBeenCalled();
    expect(getByText(/bar/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
});

it('expects something to be set in localStorage' () => {
    const value = "true"
    const key = "bar"
    render(<Component />);
    expect(setItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(key, value);
}

其他回答

对于Jest, React和TypeScript用户:

我创建了一个mockLocalStorage.ts

export const mockLocalStorage = () => {
  const setItemMock = jest.fn();
  const getItemMock = jest.fn();

  beforeEach(() => {
    Storage.prototype.setItem = setItemMock;
    Storage.prototype.getItem = getItemMock;
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    setItemMock.mockRestore();
    getItemMock.mockRestore();
  });

  return { setItemMock, getItemMock };
};

我的组件:

export const Component = () => {
    const foo = localStorage.getItem('foo')
    localStorage.setItem('bar', 'true')
    return <h1>{foo}</h1>
}

然后在我的测试中,我这样使用它:

import React from 'react';

import { mockLocalStorage } from '../../test-utils';
import { Component } from './Component';

const { getItemMock, setItemMock } = mockLocalStorage();

it('fetches something from localStorage', () => {
    getItemMock.mockReturnValue('bar');
    render(<Component />);
    expect(getItemMock).toHaveBeenCalled();
    expect(getByText(/bar/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
});

it('expects something to be set in localStorage' () => {
    const value = "true"
    const key = "bar"
    render(<Component />);
    expect(setItemMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(key, value);
}

不幸的是,我在这里找到的解决方案对我不起作用。

所以我在看Jest GitHub的问题,发现了这个帖子

得到最多好评的解决方案是:

const spy = jest.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem');

// or

Storage.prototype.getItem = jest.fn(() => 'bla');

2022年的更新。

Jest@24+具有自动模拟本地存储的能力。但是,默认情况下,它不再附带所需的依赖项。

npm 和 -D 是 environment-jsdom

你还需要改变你的笑话测试模式:

// jest.config.cjs
module.exports = {
  ...
  testEnvironment: "jsdom",
  ...
};

现在localStorage已经被模拟了。

例子:

// myStore.js
const saveLocally = (key, value) => {
  localStorage.setItem(key, value)
};

测试:

// myStore.spec.ts
import { saveLocally } from "./myStore.js"

it("saves key-value pair", () => {
  let key = "myKey";
  let value = "myValue";
  expect(localStorage.getItem(key)).toBe(null);
  saveLocally(key, value);
  expect(localStorage.getItem(key)).toBe(value);
};

在这里引用了一些其他的答案来解决一个用Typescript的项目。我像这样创建了一个LocalStorageMock:

export class LocalStorageMock {

    private store = {}

    clear() {
        this.store = {}
    }

    getItem(key: string) {
        return this.store[key] || null
    }

    setItem(key: string, value: string) {
        this.store[key] = value
    }

    removeItem(key: string) {
        delete this.store[key]
    }
}

然后我创建了一个LocalStorageWrapper类,我使用它来访问应用程序中的所有本地存储,而不是直接访问全局本地存储变量。便于在包装器中为测试设置模拟。

或者你只是像这样使用一个模拟包:

https://www.npmjs.com/package/jest-localstorage-mock

它不仅处理存储功能,还允许您测试是否实际调用了存储。