添加到Asha的响应，如果你使用单个指针指向下面的例子(例如alloc1())，你将失去对函数内部分配的内存的引用。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void alloc2(int** p) {
    *p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
    **p = 10;
}

void alloc1(int* p) {
    p = (int*)malloc(sizeof(int));
    *p = 10;
}

int main(){
    int *p = NULL;
    alloc1(p);
    //printf("%d ",*p);//undefined
    alloc2(&p);
    printf("%d ",*p);//will print 10
    free(p);
    return 0;
}

发生这种情况的原因是在alloc1中，指针是按值传入的。因此，当它被重新分配给alloc1内部的malloc调用的结果时，更改不属于不同作用域中的代码。

字符串是使用双指针的一个很好的例子。字符串本身是一个指针，所以任何时候你需要指向一个字符串，你就需要一个双指针。

我经常使用它们的一件事是，当我有一个对象数组，我需要根据不同的字段对它们执行查找(二进制搜索)。 我保留原始数组…

int num_objects;
OBJECT *original_array = malloc(sizeof(OBJECT)*num_objects);

然后创建一个指向对象的排序指针数组。

int compare_object_by_name( const void *v1, const void *v2 ) {
  OBJECT *o1 = *(OBJECT **)v1;
  OBJECT *o2 = *(OBJECT **)v2;
  return (strcmp(o1->name, o2->name);
}

OBJECT **object_ptrs_by_name = malloc(sizeof(OBJECT *)*num_objects);
  int i = 0;
  for( ; i<num_objects; i++)
    object_ptrs_by_name[i] = original_array+i;
  qsort(object_ptrs_by_name, num_objects, sizeof(OBJECT *), compare_object_by_name);

您可以根据需要创建任意数量的已排序指针数组，然后对已排序指针数组使用二进制搜索，根据已有的数据访问所需的对象。对象的原始数组可以保持无序，但是每个指针数组将按照它们指定的字段进行排序。

比较变量的修改值和指针的修改值:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void changeA(int (*a))
{
  (*a) = 10;
}

void changeP(int *(*P))
{
  (*P) = malloc(sizeof((*P)));
}

int main(void)
{
  int A = 0;

  printf("orig. A = %d\n", A);
  changeA(&A);
  printf("modi. A = %d\n", A);

  /*************************/

  int *P = NULL;

  printf("orig. P = %p\n", P);
  changeP(&P);
  printf("modi. P = %p\n", P);

  free(P);

  return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

这帮助我避免指针被调用函数修改时返回指针的值(用于单链表)。

古老的(坏的):

int *func(int *P)
{
  ...
  return P;
}

int main(void)
{
  int *pointer;
  pointer = func(pointer);
  ...
}    

新(更好的):

void func(int **pointer)
{
  ...
}

int main(void)
{
  int *pointer;
  func(&pointer);
  ...
}    

I have used double pointers today while I was programming something for work, so I can answer why we had to use them (it's the first time I actually had to use double pointers). We had to deal with real time encoding of frames contained in buffers which are members of some structures. In the encoder we had to use a pointer to one of those structures. The problem was that our pointer was being changed to point to other structures from another thread. In order to use the current structure in the encoder, I had to use a double pointer, in order to point to the pointer that was being modified in another thread. It wasn't obvious at first, at least for us, that we had to take this approach. A lot of address were printed in the process :)).

当你处理在应用程序其他地方被更改的指针时，你应该使用双指针。在处理返回和寻址给您的硬件时，您可能还会发现双指针是必须的。

假设你有一个指针。取值为地址。 但现在你想更改地址。 你可以。通过执行pointer1 = pointer2，你给了pointer1一个pointer2的地址。 但是!如果在函数中执行此操作，并且希望结果在函数完成后仍然存在，则需要做一些额外的工作。你需要一个新的pointer3来指向pointer1。将指针3传递给函数。 这里有一个例子。先看看下面的输出，以便理解。

#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{

    int c = 1;
    int d = 2;
    int e = 3;
    int * a = &c;
    int * b = &d;
    int * f = &e;
    int ** pp = &a;  // pointer to pointer 'a'

    printf("\n a's value: %x \n", a);
    printf("\n b's value: %x \n", b);
    printf("\n f's value: %x \n", f);
    printf("\n can we change a?, lets see \n");
    printf("\n a = b \n");
    a = b;
    printf("\n a's value is now: %x, same as 'b'... it seems we can, but can we do it in a function? lets see... \n", a);
    printf("\n cant_change(a, f); \n");
    cant_change(a, f);
    printf("\n a's value is now: %x, Doh! same as 'b'...  that function tricked us. \n", a);

    printf("\n NOW! lets see if a pointer to a pointer solution can help us... remember that 'pp' point to 'a' \n");
     printf("\n change(pp, f); \n");
    change(pp, f);
    printf("\n a's value is now: %x, YEAH! same as 'f'...  that function ROCKS!!!. \n", a);
    return 0;
}

void cant_change(int * x, int * z){
    x = z;
    printf("\n ----> value of 'a' is: %x inside function, same as 'f', BUT will it be the same outside of this function? lets see\n", x);
}

void change(int ** x, int * z){
    *x = z;
    printf("\n ----> value of 'a' is: %x inside function, same as 'f', BUT will it be the same outside of this function? lets see\n", *x);
}

以下是输出:(先阅读这个)

 a's value: bf94c204

 b's value: bf94c208 

 f's value: bf94c20c 

 can we change a?, lets see 

 a = b 

 a's value is now: bf94c208, same as 'b'... it seems we can, but can we do it in a function? lets see... 

 cant_change(a, f); 

 ----> value of 'a' is: bf94c20c inside function, same as 'f', BUT will it be the same outside of this function? lets see

 a's value is now: bf94c208, Doh! same as 'b'...  that function tricked us. 

 NOW! lets see if a pointer to a pointer solution can help us... remember that 'pp' point to 'a' 

 change(pp, f); 

 ----> value of 'a' is: bf94c20c inside function, same as 'f', BUT will it be the same outside of this function? lets see

 a's value is now: bf94c20c, YEAH! same as 'f'...  that function ROCKS!!!.