类似的情况没有使用swap b

    Random r = new Random();
    int n = solutionArray.length;
    List<Integer> arr =  Arrays.stream(solutionArray)
                               .boxed()
                               .collect(Collectors.toList());
    for (int i = 0; i < n-1; i++) {
        solutionArray[i] = arr.remove(r.nextInt(arr.size())); // randomize based on size
    }
    solutionArray[n-1] = arr.get(0);

无随机解:

   static void randomArrTimest(int[] some){
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < some.length; i++) {
            long indexToSwap = startTime%(i+1);
            long tmp = some[(int) indexToSwap];
            some[(int) indexToSwap] = some[i];
            some[i] = (int) tmp;
        }
        System.out.println(Arrays.toString(some));
    }

下面是数组的泛型版本:

import java.util.Random;

public class Shuffle<T> {

    private final Random rnd;

    public Shuffle() {
        rnd = new Random();
    }

    /**
     * Fisher–Yates shuffle.
     */
    public void shuffle(T[] ar) {
        for (int i = ar.length - 1; i > 0; i--) {
            int index = rnd.nextInt(i + 1);
            T a = ar[index];
            ar[index] = ar[i];
            ar[i] = a;
        }
    }
}

考虑到ArrayList基本上只是一个数组，使用ArrayList而不是显式数组并使用Collections.shuffle()可能是明智的。但是，性能测试并没有显示上述方法与Collections.sort()之间有任何显著差异:

Shuffe<Integer>.shuffle(...) performance: 576084 shuffles per second
Collections.shuffle(ArrayList<Integer>) performance: 629400 shuffles per second
MathArrays.shuffle(int[]) performance: 53062 shuffles per second

Apache Commons实现MathArrays。Shuffle限制为int[]，性能损失可能是由于使用了随机数生成器。

我在权衡这个非常流行的问题，因为没有人写过一个shuffle-copy版本。样式大量借鉴了Arrays.java，因为现在谁没有掠夺Java技术呢?包括泛型和int实现。

   /**
    * Shuffles elements from {@code original} into a newly created array.
    *
    * @param original the original array
    * @return the new, shuffled array
    * @throws NullPointerException if {@code original == null}
    */
   @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
   public static <T> T[] shuffledCopy(T[] original) {
      int originalLength = original.length; // For exception priority compatibility.
      Random random = new Random();
      T[] result = (T[]) Array.newInstance(original.getClass().getComponentType(), originalLength);

      for (int i = 0; i < originalLength; i++) {
         int j = random.nextInt(i+1);
         result[i] = result[j];
         result[j] = original[i];
      }

      return result;
   }


   /**
    * Shuffles elements from {@code original} into a newly created array.
    *
    * @param original the original array
    * @return the new, shuffled array
    * @throws NullPointerException if {@code original == null}
    */
   public static int[] shuffledCopy(int[] original) {
      int originalLength = original.length;
      Random random = new Random();
      int[] result = new int[originalLength];

      for (int i = 0; i < originalLength; i++) {
         int j = random.nextInt(i+1);
         result[i] = result[j];
         result[j] = original[i];
      }

      return result;
   }

下面是一个使用数组列表的简单方法:

List<Integer> solution = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
    solution.add(i);
}
Collections.shuffle(solution);

看看Collections类，特别是shuffle(…)。