在编写多线程应用程序时,遇到的最常见的问题之一是竞争条件。
我对社区的问题是:
竞态条件是什么? 你如何发现它们? 你是如何处理的? 最后,你如何防止它们的发生?
在编写多线程应用程序时,遇到的最常见的问题之一是竞争条件。
我对社区的问题是:
竞态条件是什么? 你如何发现它们? 你是如何处理的? 最后,你如何防止它们的发生?
当前回答
为了更好地理解竞态条件,请尝试以下基本示例:
public class ThreadRaceCondition {
/**
* @param args
* @throws InterruptedException
*/
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
Account myAccount = new Account(22222222);
// Expected deposit: 250
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
Transaction t = new Transaction(myAccount,
Transaction.TransactionType.DEPOSIT, 5.00);
t.start();
}
// Expected withdrawal: 50
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
Transaction t = new Transaction(myAccount,
Transaction.TransactionType.WITHDRAW, 1.00);
t.start();
}
// Temporary sleep to ensure all threads are completed. Don't use in
// realworld :-)
Thread.sleep(1000);
// Expected account balance is 200
System.out.println("Final Account Balance: "
+ myAccount.getAccountBalance());
}
}
class Transaction extends Thread {
public static enum TransactionType {
DEPOSIT(1), WITHDRAW(2);
private int value;
private TransactionType(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
};
private TransactionType transactionType;
private Account account;
private double amount;
/*
* If transactionType == 1, deposit else if transactionType == 2 withdraw
*/
public Transaction(Account account, TransactionType transactionType,
double amount) {
this.transactionType = transactionType;
this.account = account;
this.amount = amount;
}
public void run() {
switch (this.transactionType) {
case DEPOSIT:
deposit();
printBalance();
break;
case WITHDRAW:
withdraw();
printBalance();
break;
default:
System.out.println("NOT A VALID TRANSACTION");
}
;
}
public void deposit() {
this.account.deposit(this.amount);
}
public void withdraw() {
this.account.withdraw(amount);
}
public void printBalance() {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ " : TransactionType: " + this.transactionType + ", Amount: "
+ this.amount);
System.out.println("Account Balance: "
+ this.account.getAccountBalance());
}
}
class Account {
private int accountNumber;
private double accountBalance;
public int getAccountNumber() {
return accountNumber;
}
public double getAccountBalance() {
return accountBalance;
}
public Account(int accountNumber) {
this.accountNumber = accountNumber;
}
// If this method is not synchronized, you will see race condition on
// Remove syncronized keyword to see race condition
public synchronized boolean deposit(double amount) {
if (amount < 0) {
return false;
} else {
accountBalance = accountBalance + amount;
return true;
}
}
// If this method is not synchronized, you will see race condition on
// Remove syncronized keyword to see race condition
public synchronized boolean withdraw(double amount) {
if (amount > accountBalance) {
return false;
} else {
accountBalance = accountBalance - amount;
return true;
}
}
}
其他回答
Race conditions occur in multi-threaded applications or multi-process systems. A race condition, at its most basic, is anything that makes the assumption that two things not in the same thread or process will happen in a particular order, without taking steps to ensure that they do. This happens commonly when two threads are passing messages by setting and checking member variables of a class both can access. There's almost always a race condition when one thread calls sleep to give another thread time to finish a task (unless that sleep is in a loop, with some checking mechanism).
防止竞争条件的工具依赖于语言和操作系统,但一些常见的工具是互斥锁、临界区和信号。互斥锁在你想确保你是唯一一个在做某事的时候很有用。当你想确保别人已经完成某件事时,信号是很好的。最小化共享资源还有助于防止意外行为
Detecting race conditions can be difficult, but there are a couple signs. Code which relies heavily on sleeps is prone to race conditions, so first check for calls to sleep in the affected code. Adding particularly long sleeps can also be used for debugging to try and force a particular order of events. This can be useful for reproducing the behavior, seeing if you can make it disappear by changing the timing of things, and for testing solutions put in place. The sleeps should be removed after debugging.
但是,如果某个问题只在某些机器上断断续续地发生,则是存在竞争条件的标志性标志。常见的错误是崩溃和死锁。使用日志记录,您应该能够找到受影响的区域并从那里返回。
如果你使用“原子”类,你可以防止竞争条件。原因是线程没有分开操作get和set,示例如下:
AtomicInteger ai = new AtomicInteger(2);
ai.getAndAdd(5);
因此,你将有7在链接“ai”。 虽然你做了两个操作,但这两个操作都确认了同一个线程,没有其他线程会干涉这,这意味着没有竞争条件!
竞态条件是一种bug,只会在特定的时间条件下发生。
例子: 假设您有两个线程,A和B。
在线程A中:
if( object.a != 0 )
object.avg = total / object.a
线程B:
object.a = 0
如果线程A在检查完对象后被抢占。a不为空,B将执行a = 0,当线程a将获得处理器时,它将执行“除零”。
这个错误只发生在if语句之后的线程A被抢占时,这是非常罕见的,但它是有可能发生的。
我做了一个视频来解释这个。
从本质上讲,它是当你有一个跨多个线程共享的状态,在一个给定状态的第一次执行完成之前,另一个执行开始,一个给定操作的新线程的初始状态是错误的,因为前一次执行还没有完成。
由于第二次执行的初始状态是错误的,因此计算结果也是错误的。因为最终第二次执行会用错误的结果更新最终状态。
你可以在这里查看。 https://youtu.be/RWRicNoWKOY
竞态条件是当两个或多个进程可以同时访问和更改共享数据时出现的不希望出现的情况。这是因为对资源的访问发生冲突。临界区问题可能导致竞争状态。为了解决进程之间的临界条件,我们每次只取出一个执行临界段的进程。