我正在寻找优先级队列或堆数据结构的.NET实现
Priority queues are data structures that provide more flexibility than simple sorting, because they allow new elements to enter a system at arbitrary intervals. It is much more cost-effective to insert a new job into a priority queue than to re-sort everything on each such arrival.
The basic priority queue supports three primary operations:
Insert(Q,x). Given an item x with key k, insert it into the priority queue Q.
Find-Minimum(Q). Return a pointer to the item
whose key value is smaller than any other key in the priority queue
Q.
Delete-Minimum(Q). Remove the item from the priority queue Q whose key is minimum
除非我找错地方了，否则框架里没有。有谁知道好的吗，还是我自己卷?
AlgoKit
我写了一个名为AlgoKit的开源库，可以通过NuGet获得。它包含:
隐式d-ary堆(ArrayHeap)，
二项堆,
配对堆。
代码已经经过了广泛的测试。我强烈建议你试一试。
例子
var comparer = Comparer<int>.Default;
var heap = new PairingHeap<int, string>(comparer);
heap.Add(3, "your");
heap.Add(5, "of");
heap.Add(7, "disturbing.");
heap.Add(2, "find");
heap.Add(1, "I");
heap.Add(6, "faith");
heap.Add(4, "lack");
while (!heap.IsEmpty)
Console.WriteLine(heap.Pop().Value);
为什么有三堆?
实现的最佳选择强烈依赖于输入-正如Larkin, Sen和Tarjan在优先队列的回归基础经验研究中所显示的，arXiv:1403.0252v1 [cs.DS]。他们测试了隐式d-ary堆、配对堆、斐波那契堆、二项式堆、显式d-ary堆、排名配对堆、震动堆、违反堆、排名放松的弱堆和严格斐波那契堆。
AlgoKit具有三种类型的堆，在测试中似乎是最有效的。
关于选择的提示
对于数量相对较少的元素，您可能会对使用隐式堆感兴趣，特别是第四元堆(隐式4元)。在操作较大堆大小的情况下，像二项式堆和配对堆这样的平摊结构应该执行得更好。
你可能会喜欢C5泛型集合库中的IntervalHeap。引用用户指南
类IntervalHeap<T>使用存储为对数组的间隔堆实现接口IPriorityQueue<T>。FindMin和
FindMax操作和索引器的get-访问器花费的时间为O(1)。DeleteMin,
DeleteMax、Add和Update操作，以及索引器的集访问器，都需要时间
O(log n)。与普通优先级队列相比，间隔堆提供了两个最小优先级队列
同样效率的最大操作。
API非常简单
> var heap = new C5.IntervalHeap<int>();
> heap.Add(10);
> heap.Add(5);
> heap.FindMin();
5
从Nuget https://www.nuget.org/packages/C5或GitHub https://github.com/sestoft/C5/安装
一个简单的最大堆实现。
https://github.com/bharathkumarms/AlgorithmsMadeEasy/blob/master/AlgorithmsMadeEasy/MaxHeap.cs
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace AlgorithmsMadeEasy
{
class MaxHeap
{
private static int capacity = 10;
private int size = 0;
int[] items = new int[capacity];
private int getLeftChildIndex(int parentIndex) { return 2 * parentIndex + 1; }
private int getRightChildIndex(int parentIndex) { return 2 * parentIndex + 2; }
private int getParentIndex(int childIndex) { return (childIndex - 1) / 2; }
private int getLeftChild(int parentIndex) { return this.items[getLeftChildIndex(parentIndex)]; }
private int getRightChild(int parentIndex) { return this.items[getRightChildIndex(parentIndex)]; }
private int getParent(int childIndex) { return this.items[getParentIndex(childIndex)]; }
private bool hasLeftChild(int parentIndex) { return getLeftChildIndex(parentIndex) < size; }
private bool hasRightChild(int parentIndex) { return getRightChildIndex(parentIndex) < size; }
private bool hasParent(int childIndex) { return getLeftChildIndex(childIndex) > 0; }
private void swap(int indexOne, int indexTwo)
{
int temp = this.items[indexOne];
this.items[indexOne] = this.items[indexTwo];
this.items[indexTwo] = temp;
}
private void hasEnoughCapacity()
{
if (this.size == capacity)
{
Array.Resize(ref this.items,capacity*2);
capacity *= 2;
}
}
public void Add(int item)
{
this.hasEnoughCapacity();
this.items[size] = item;
this.size++;
heapifyUp();
}
public int Remove()
{
int item = this.items[0];
this.items[0] = this.items[size-1];
this.items[this.size - 1] = 0;
size--;
heapifyDown();
return item;
}
private void heapifyUp()
{
int index = this.size - 1;
while (hasParent(index) && this.items[index] > getParent(index))
{
swap(index, getParentIndex(index));
index = getParentIndex(index);
}
}
private void heapifyDown()
{
int index = 0;
while (hasLeftChild(index))
{
int bigChildIndex = getLeftChildIndex(index);
if (hasRightChild(index) && getLeftChild(index) < getRightChild(index))
{
bigChildIndex = getRightChildIndex(index);
}
if (this.items[bigChildIndex] < this.items[index])
{
break;
}
else
{
swap(bigChildIndex,index);
index = bigChildIndex;
}
}
}
}
}
/*
Calling Code:
MaxHeap mh = new MaxHeap();
mh.Add(10);
mh.Add(5);
mh.Add(2);
mh.Add(1);
mh.Add(50);
int maxVal = mh.Remove();
int newMaxVal = mh.Remove();
*/
这是我刚刚写的一个，也许它没有那么优化(只是使用了一个排序的字典)，但很容易理解。
您可以插入不同类型的对象，因此没有泛型队列。
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace PrioQueue
{
public class PrioQueue
{
int total_size;
SortedDictionary<int, Queue> storage;
public PrioQueue ()
{
this.storage = new SortedDictionary<int, Queue> ();
this.total_size = 0;
}
public bool IsEmpty ()
{
return (total_size == 0);
}
public object Dequeue ()
{
if (IsEmpty ()) {
throw new Exception ("Please check that priorityQueue is not empty before dequeing");
} else
foreach (Queue q in storage.Values) {
// we use a sorted dictionary
if (q.Count > 0) {
total_size--;
return q.Dequeue ();
}
}
Debug.Assert(false,"not supposed to reach here. problem with changing total_size");
return null; // not supposed to reach here.
}
// same as above, except for peek.
public object Peek ()
{
if (IsEmpty ())
throw new Exception ("Please check that priorityQueue is not empty before peeking");
else
foreach (Queue q in storage.Values) {
if (q.Count > 0)
return q.Peek ();
}
Debug.Assert(false,"not supposed to reach here. problem with changing total_size");
return null; // not supposed to reach here.
}
public object Dequeue (int prio)
{
total_size--;
return storage[prio].Dequeue ();
}
public void Enqueue (object item, int prio)
{
if (!storage.ContainsKey (prio)) {
storage.Add (prio, new Queue ());
}
storage[prio].Enqueue (item);
total_size++;
}
}
}
