我想用Python编写一个函数,根据输入索引的值返回不同的固定值。
在其他语言中,我会使用switch或case语句,但Python似乎没有switch语句。在此场景中,推荐的Python解决方案是什么?
我想用Python编写一个函数,根据输入索引的值返回不同的固定值。
在其他语言中,我会使用switch或case语句,但Python似乎没有switch语句。在此场景中,推荐的Python解决方案是什么?
当前回答
作为Mark Biek答案的一个小变化,对于像这样的不常见情况,用户有一堆函数调用要延迟,而参数要打包(而且不值得构建一堆不符合逻辑的函数),而不是这样:
d = {
"a1": lambda: a(1),
"a2": lambda: a(2),
"b": lambda: b("foo"),
"c": lambda: c(),
"z": lambda: z("bar", 25),
}
return d[string]()
…您可以这样做:
d = {
"a1": (a, 1),
"a2": (a, 2),
"b": (b, "foo"),
"c": (c,)
"z": (z, "bar", 25),
}
func, *args = d[string]
return func(*args)
这当然更短,但它是否更可读是一个悬而未决的问题…
我认为从lambda转换为partial可能更容易理解(虽然不是更简单):
d = {
"a1": partial(a, 1),
"a2": partial(a, 2),
"b": partial(b, "foo"),
"c": c,
"z": partial(z, "bar", 25),
}
return d[string]()
…它的优点是可以很好地处理关键字参数:
d = {
"a1": partial(a, 1),
"a2": partial(a, 2),
"b": partial(b, "foo"),
"c": c,
"k": partial(k, key=int),
"z": partial(z, "bar", 25),
}
return d[string]()
其他回答
扩展Greg Hewgill的答案-我们可以使用装饰器封装字典解决方案:
def case(callable):
"""switch-case decorator"""
class case_class(object):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.args = args
self.kwargs = kwargs
def do_call(self):
return callable(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
return case_class
def switch(key, cases, default=None):
"""switch-statement"""
ret = None
try:
ret = case[key].do_call()
except KeyError:
if default:
ret = default.do_call()
finally:
return ret
然后可以将其与@case decorator一起使用
@case
def case_1(arg1):
print 'case_1: ', arg1
@case
def case_2(arg1, arg2):
print 'case_2'
return arg1, arg2
@case
def default_case(arg1, arg2, arg3):
print 'default_case: ', arg1, arg2, arg3
ret = switch(somearg, {
1: case_1('somestring'),
2: case_2(13, 42)
}, default_case(123, 'astring', 3.14))
print ret
好消息是,这已经在NeoPySwitch模块中完成。只需使用pip进行安装:
pip install NeoPySwitch
扩展“dict as switch”思想。如果要为交换机使用默认值:
def f(x):
try:
return {
'a': 1,
'b': 2,
}[x]
except KeyError:
return 'default'
我倾向于使用字典的解决方案是:
def decision_time( key, *args, **kwargs):
def action1()
"""This function is a closure - and has access to all the arguments"""
pass
def action2()
"""This function is a closure - and has access to all the arguments"""
pass
def action3()
"""This function is a closure - and has access to all the arguments"""
pass
return {1:action1, 2:action2, 3:action3}.get(key,default)()
这样做的优点是它不需要每次都对函数求值,您只需确保外部函数获得内部函数所需的所有信息。
我最喜欢的是一个非常好的食谱。这是我见过的最接近实际switchcase语句的语句,尤其是在特性中。
class switch(object):
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
self.fall = False
def __iter__(self):
"""Return the match method once, then stop"""
yield self.match
raise StopIteration
def match(self, *args):
"""Indicate whether or not to enter a case suite"""
if self.fall or not args:
return True
elif self.value in args: # changed for v1.5, see below
self.fall = True
return True
else:
return False
下面是一个示例:
# The following example is pretty much the exact use-case of a dictionary,
# but is included for its simplicity. Note that you can include statements
# in each suite.
v = 'ten'
for case in switch(v):
if case('one'):
print 1
break
if case('two'):
print 2
break
if case('ten'):
print 10
break
if case('eleven'):
print 11
break
if case(): # default, could also just omit condition or 'if True'
print "something else!"
# No need to break here, it'll stop anyway
# break is used here to look as much like the real thing as possible, but
# elif is generally just as good and more concise.
# Empty suites are considered syntax errors, so intentional fall-throughs
# should contain 'pass'
c = 'z'
for case in switch(c):
if case('a'): pass # only necessary if the rest of the suite is empty
if case('b'): pass
# ...
if case('y'): pass
if case('z'):
print "c is lowercase!"
break
if case('A'): pass
# ...
if case('Z'):
print "c is uppercase!"
break
if case(): # default
print "I dunno what c was!"
# As suggested by Pierre Quentel, you can even expand upon the
# functionality of the classic 'case' statement by matching multiple
# cases in a single shot. This greatly benefits operations such as the
# uppercase/lowercase example above:
import string
c = 'A'
for case in switch(c):
if case(*string.lowercase): # note the * for unpacking as arguments
print "c is lowercase!"
break
if case(*string.uppercase):
print "c is uppercase!"
break
if case('!', '?', '.'): # normal argument passing style also applies
print "c is a sentence terminator!"
break
if case(): # default
print "I dunno what c was!"
一些评论指出,使用foo作为case而不是foo中的case的上下文管理器解决方案可能更干净,对于大型switch语句,线性而不是二次行为可能是一个不错的选择。使用for循环的答案的一部分价值是有中断和突破的能力,如果我们愿意稍微使用我们选择的关键字,我们也可以在上下文管理器中实现这一点:
class Switch:
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
self._entered = False
self._broken = False
self._prev = None
def __enter__(self):
return self
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
return False # Allows a traceback to occur
def __call__(self, *values):
if self._broken:
return False
if not self._entered:
if values and self.value not in values:
return False
self._entered, self._prev = True, values
return True
if self._prev is None:
self._prev = values
return True
if self._prev != values:
self._broken = True
return False
if self._prev == values:
self._prev = None
return False
@property
def default(self):
return self()
下面是一个示例:
# Prints 'bar' then 'baz'.
with Switch(2) as case:
while case(0):
print('foo')
while case(1, 2, 3):
print('bar')
while case(4, 5):
print('baz')
break
while case.default:
print('default')
break
我喜欢Mark Bies的回答
由于x变量必须使用两次,我将lambda函数修改为无参数。
我必须运行结果[value](value)
In [2]: result = {
...: 'a': lambda x: 'A',
...: 'b': lambda x: 'B',
...: 'c': lambda x: 'C'
...: }
...: result['a']('a')
...:
Out[2]: 'A'
In [3]: result = {
...: 'a': lambda : 'A',
...: 'b': lambda : 'B',
...: 'c': lambda : 'C',
...: None: lambda : 'Nothing else matters'
...: }
...: result['a']()
...:
Out[3]: 'A'
编辑:我注意到我可以在字典中使用None类型。因此,这将模拟交换机;其他情况