我想用Python编写一个函数,根据输入索引的值返回不同的固定值。

在其他语言中,我会使用switch或case语句,但Python似乎没有switch语句。在此场景中,推荐的Python解决方案是什么?


当前回答

运行函数的解决方案:

result = {
    'case1':     foo1, 
    'case2':     foo2,
    'case3':     foo3,
}.get(option)(parameters_optional)

其中foo1()、foo2()和foo3()是函数

示例1(带参数):

option = number['type']
result = {
    'number':     value_of_int,  # result = value_of_int(number['value'])
    'text':       value_of_text, # result = value_of_text(number['value'])
    'binary':     value_of_bin,  # result = value_of_bin(number['value'])
}.get(option)(value['value'])

示例2(无参数):

option = number['type']
result = {
    'number':     func_for_number, # result = func_for_number()
    'text':       func_for_text,   # result = func_for_text()
    'binary':     func_for_bin,    # result = func_for_bin()
}.get(option)()

示例4(仅限值):

option = number['type']
result = {
    'number':    lambda: 10,       # result = 10
    'text':      lambda: 'ten',    # result = 'ten'
    'binary':    lambda: 0b101111, # result = 47
}.get(option)()

其他回答

虽然已经有了足够的答案,但我想指出一个更简单、更强大的解决方案:

class Switch:
    def __init__(self, switches):
        self.switches = switches
        self.between = len(switches[0]) == 3

    def __call__(self, x):
        for line in self.switches:
            if self.between:
                if line[0] <= x < line[1]:
                    return line[2]
            else:
                if line[0] == x:
                    return line[1]
        return None


if __name__ == '__main__':
    between_table = [
        (1, 4, 'between 1 and 4'),
        (4, 8, 'between 4 and 8')
    ]

    switch_between = Switch(between_table)

    print('Switch Between:')
    for i in range(0, 10):
        if switch_between(i):
            print('{} is {}'.format(i, switch_between(i)))
        else:
            print('No match for {}'.format(i))


    equals_table = [
        (1, 'One'),
        (2, 'Two'),
        (4, 'Four'),
        (5, 'Five'),
        (7, 'Seven'),
        (8, 'Eight')
    ]
    print('Switch Equals:')
    switch_equals = Switch(equals_table)
    for i in range(0, 10):
        if switch_equals(i):
            print('{} is {}'.format(i, switch_equals(i)))
        else:
            print('No match for {}'.format(i))

输出:

Switch Between:
No match for 0
1 is between 1 and 4
2 is between 1 and 4
3 is between 1 and 4
4 is between 4 and 8
5 is between 4 and 8
6 is between 4 and 8
7 is between 4 and 8
No match for 8
No match for 9

Switch Equals:
No match for 0
1 is One
2 is Two
No match for 3
4 is Four
5 is Five
No match for 6
7 is Seven
8 is Eight
No match for 9

我要把我的两分钱放在这里。Python中没有case/switch语句的原因是因为Python遵循“只有一种正确的方法”的原则。很明显,您可以想出各种方法来重新创建switch/case功能,但实现这一点的Python方法是if/elf构造。即。,

if something:
    return "first thing"
elif somethingelse:
    return "second thing"
elif yetanotherthing:
    return "third thing"
else:
    return "default thing"

我只是觉得PEP 8应该在这里获得认可。Python的一个优点是它的简单和优雅。这在很大程度上源于PEP8中提出的原则,包括“只有一种正确的方法可以做某事。”

switch语句只是if/elif/else的语法糖。任何控制语句所做的都是基于某个条件(即决策路径)来授权作业。为了将其包装到模块中并能够基于其唯一id调用作业,可以使用继承和Python中的任何方法都是虚拟的这一事实来提供派生类特定的作业实现,作为特定的“case”处理程序:

#!/usr/bin/python

import sys

class Case(object):
    """
        Base class which specifies the interface for the "case" handler.
        The all required arbitrary arguments inside "execute" method will be
        provided through the derived class
        specific constructor

        @note in Python, all class methods are virtual
    """
    def __init__(self, id):
        self.id = id

    def pair(self):
        """
            Pairs the given id of the "case" with
            the instance on which "execute" will be called
        """
        return (self.id, self)

    def execute(self): # Base class virtual method that needs to be overridden
        pass

class Case1(Case):
    def __init__(self, id, msg):
        self.id = id
        self.msg = msg
    def execute(self): # Override the base class method
        print("<Case1> id={}, message: \"{}\"".format(str(self.id), self.msg))

class Case2(Case):
    def __init__(self, id, n):
        self.id = id
        self.n = n
    def execute(self): # Override the base class method
        print("<Case2> id={}, n={}.".format(str(self.id), str(self.n)))
        print("\n".join(map(str, range(self.n))))


class Switch(object):
    """
        The class which delegates the jobs
        based on the given job id
    """
    def __init__(self, cases):
        self.cases = cases # dictionary: time complexity for the access operation is 1
    def resolve(self, id):

        try:
            cases[id].execute()
        except KeyError as e:
            print("Given id: {} is wrong!".format(str(id)))



if __name__ == '__main__':

    # Cases
    cases=dict([Case1(0, "switch").pair(), Case2(1, 5).pair()])

    switch = Switch(cases)

    # id will be dynamically specified
    switch.resolve(0)
    switch.resolve(1)
    switch.resolve(2)

这里的大多数答案都很陈旧,尤其是那些被接受的答案,因此似乎值得更新。

首先,官方的Python常见问题解答涵盖了这一点,并为简单案例推荐elif链,为更大或更复杂的案例推荐dict。它还建议在某些情况下使用一组visit_方法(许多服务器框架使用的样式):

def dispatch(self, value):
    method_name = 'visit_' + str(value)
    method = getattr(self, method_name)
    method()

FAQ还提到了PEP275,它是为了让官方一劳永逸地决定添加C风格切换语句而编写的。但PEP实际上被推迟到了Python 3,它只是作为一个单独的提案PEP3103被正式拒绝。答案当然是否定的,但如果你对原因或历史感兴趣的话,这两位政治公众人物可以获得更多信息。


有一件事多次出现(在PEP 275中可以看到,尽管它是作为实际推荐删除的),那就是如果你真的为处理4种情况而烦恼的是8行代码,而不是C或Bash中的6行代码,你总是可以这样写:

if x == 1: print('first')
elif x == 2: print('second')
elif x == 3: print('third')
else: print('did not place')

这并不是PEP 8所鼓励的,但它是可读的,并不是太单一。


自PEP 3103被拒绝以来的十多年里,C风格的案例陈述,甚至围棋中稍微更强大的版本,都被认为已经过时;每当有人提出python想法或-dev时,他们都会参考旧的决定。

然而,完全ML样式的模式匹配的想法每隔几年就会出现一次,特别是在Swift和Rust等语言采用它之后。问题是,如果没有代数数据类型,很难充分利用模式匹配。虽然圭多一直赞同这个想法,但没有人提出一个非常适合Python的方案。(你可以阅读我2014年的strawman作为一个例子。)这可能会随着3.7中的dataclass和一些零星的建议而改变,比如使用更强大的枚举来处理sum类型,或者使用不同类型的语句本地绑定的各种建议(如PEP3150,或者当前正在讨论的一组建议-ideas)。但到目前为止,它还没有。

偶尔也会有关于Perl 6样式匹配的建议,这基本上是从elif到regex到单分派类型切换的混合。

如果您想要默认值,可以使用dictionary get(key[,default])函数:

def f(x):
    return {
        'a': 1,
        'b': 2
    }.get(x, 9)    # 9 will be returned default if x is not found