我在C#(ApplicationClass)中使用Excel互操作,并在finally子句中放置了以下代码:

while (System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(excelSheet) != 0) { }
excelSheet = null;
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

尽管这种方法有效,但即使在我关闭Excel之后,Excel.exe进程仍处于后台。它只在我的应用程序被手动关闭后发布。

我做错了什么,或者是否有其他方法可以确保正确处理互操作对象?


当前回答

您需要意识到Excel对您正在运行的文化也非常敏感。

您可能会发现,在调用Excel函数之前,需要将区域性设置为EN-US。这并不适用于所有函数,但适用于其中一些函数。

    CultureInfo en_US = new System.Globalization.CultureInfo("en-US"); 
    System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = en_US;
    string filePathLocal = _applicationObject.ActiveWorkbook.Path;
    System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = orgCulture;

即使您正在使用VSTO,这也适用。

有关详细信息:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;我们;第320369季度

其他回答

这对我正在进行的一个项目起到了作用:

excelApp.Quit();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject (excelWB);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject (excelApp);
excelApp = null;

我们了解到,在使用Excel COM对象时,将其每个引用都设置为空非常重要。这包括单元格、工作表和所有内容。

Excel不会退出,因为应用程序仍保留对COM对象的引用。

我猜您调用了COM对象的至少一个成员,而没有将其分配给变量。

对我来说,它是excelApp.Worksheets对象,我直接使用它,而没有将它分配给变量:

Worksheet sheet = excelApp.Worksheets.Open(...);
...
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(sheet);

我不知道C#在内部为WorksheetsCOM对象创建了一个包装器,但我的代码没有发布它(因为我不知道),这也是Excel没有卸载的原因。

我在这个页面上找到了我的问题的解决方案,它也有一个关于C#中COM对象用法的好规则:

切勿对COM对象使用两点。


因此,有了这些知识,正确的方法是:

Worksheets sheets = excelApp.Worksheets; // <-- The important part
Worksheet sheet = sheets.Open(...);
...
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(sheets);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(sheet);

尸检后更新:

我希望每一位读者都能非常仔细地阅读Hans Passant的回答,因为它解释了我和许多其他开发人员偶然遇到的陷阱。几年前我写这个答案时,我不知道调试器对垃圾收集器的影响,得出了错误的结论。为了历史起见,我的答案保持不变,但请阅读此链接,不要走“两点”的道路:了解.NET中的垃圾收集和使用IDisposable清理Excel互操作对象

我真的很喜欢当事情在自己身上清理干净。。。所以我做了一些包装类,为我做所有的清理工作!这些将进一步记录下来。

最终代码非常可读和可访问。在我关闭()工作簿并退出()应用程序之后,我还没有发现任何Excel的虚拟实例在运行(除了在调试和关闭应用程序的过程中)。

function void OpenCopyClose() {
  var excel = new ExcelApplication();
  var workbook1 = excel.OpenWorkbook("C:\Temp\file1.xslx", readOnly: true);
  var readOnlysheet = workbook1.Worksheet("sheet1");

  var workbook2 = excel.OpenWorkbook("C:\Temp\file2.xslx");
  var writeSheet = workbook.Worksheet("sheet1");

  // do all the excel manipulation

  // read from the first workbook, write to the second workbook.
  var a1 = workbook1.Cells[1, 1];
  workbook2.Cells[1, 1] = a1

  // explicit clean-up
  workbook1.Close(false);
  workbook2 .Close(true);
  excel.Quit();
}

注意:您可以跳过Close()和Quit()调用,但如果您正在写入Excel文档,则至少需要Save()。当对象超出范围(方法返回)时,类终结器将自动启动并进行任何清理。只要小心变量的作用域,工作表COM对象中对COM对象的任何引用都将被自动管理和清理,例如,只有在存储对COM对象引用时,才将变量保持在当前作用域的本地。如果需要,您可以轻松地将所需的值复制到POCO,或者创建其他包装类,如下所述。

为了管理所有这些,我创建了一个类DisposableComObject,它充当任何COM对象的包装器。它实现了IDisposable接口,还为不喜欢使用的用户提供了一个终结器。

Dispose()方法调用Marshal.ReleaseComObject(ComObject),然后将ComObjectRef属性设置为null。

当私有ComObjectRef属性为null时,对象处于已释放状态。

如果在释放后访问ComObject属性,则会引发ComObjectAccessedAfterDisposeException异常。

可以手动调用Dispose()方法。它也由终结器在using块结束时调用,并在该变量的作用域结束时使用var。

Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel、Application、Workbook和Worksheet中的顶级类都有自己的包装类,每个包装类都是DisposableComObject的子类

代码如下:

/// <summary>
/// References to COM objects must be explicitly released when done.
/// Failure to do so can result in odd behavior and processes remaining running after the application has stopped.
/// This class helps to automate the process of disposing the references to COM objects.
/// </summary>
public abstract class DisposableComObject : IDisposable
{
    public class ComObjectAccessedAfterDisposeException : Exception
    {
        public ComObjectAccessedAfterDisposeException() : base("COM object has been accessed after being disposed") { }
    }

    /// <summary>The actual COM object</summary>
    private object ComObjectRef { get; set; }

    /// <summary>The COM object to be used by subclasses</summary>
    /// <exception cref="ComObjectAccessedAfterDisposeException">When the COM object has been disposed</exception>
    protected object ComObject => ComObjectRef ?? throw new ComObjectAccessedAfterDisposeException();

    public DisposableComObject(object comObject) => ComObjectRef = comObject;

    /// <summary>
    /// True, if the COM object has been disposed.
    /// </summary>
    protected bool IsDisposed() => ComObjectRef is null;

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this); // in case a subclass implements a finalizer
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// This method releases the COM object and removes the reference.
    /// This allows the garbage collector to clean up any remaining instance.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="disposing">Set to true</param>
    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!disposing || IsDisposed()) return;
        Marshal.ReleaseComObject(ComObject);
        ComObjectRef = null;
    }

    ~DisposableComObject()
    {
        Dispose(true);
    }
}

还有一个方便的泛型子类,使用起来稍微简单一些。

public abstract class DisposableComObject<T> : DisposableComObject
{
    protected new T ComObject => (T)base.ComObject;

    public DisposableComObject(T comObject) : base(comObject) { }
}

最后,我们可以使用DisposableComObject<T>为Excel互操作类创建包装类。

ExcelApplication子类引用了一个新的Excel应用程序实例,用于打开工作簿。

OpenWorkbook()返回一个ExcelWorkbook,它也是DisposableComObject的子类。

在调用基Dispose()方法之前,Dispose(()已被重写以退出Excel应用程序。Quit()是Dispose()的别名。

public class ExcelApplication : DisposableComObject<Application>
{
    public class OpenWorkbookActionCancelledException : Exception
    {
        public string Filename { get; }

        public OpenWorkbookActionCancelledException(string filename, COMException ex) : base($"The workbook open action was cancelled. {ex.Message}", ex) => Filename = filename;
    }

    /// <summary>The actual Application from Interop.Excel</summary>
    Application App => ComObject;

    public ExcelApplication() : base(new Application()) { }

    /// <summary>Open a workbook.</summary>
    public ExcelWorkbook OpenWorkbook(string filename, bool readOnly = false, string password = null, string writeResPassword = null)
    {
        try
        {
            var workbook = App.Workbooks.Open(Filename: filename, UpdateLinks: (XlUpdateLinks)0, ReadOnly: readOnly, Password: password, WriteResPassword: writeResPassword, );

            return new ExcelWorkbook(workbook);
        }
        catch (COMException ex)
        {
            // If the workbook is already open and the request mode is not read-only, the user will be presented
            // with a prompt from the Excel application asking if the workbook should be opened in read-only mode.
            // This exception is raised when when the user clicks the Cancel button in that prompt.
            throw new OpenWorkbookActionCancelledException(filename, ex);
        }
    }

    /// <summary>Quit the running application.</summary>
    public void Quit() => Dispose(true);

    /// <inheritdoc/>
    protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!disposing || IsDisposed()) return;
        App.Quit();
        base.Dispose(disposing);
    }
}

ExcelWorkbook还子类DisposableComObject<Workbook>,用于打开工作表。

Worksheet()方法返回ExcelWorksheet,您猜到了,它也是DisposableComObject<Workbook>的子类。

Dispose()方法被重写,首先关闭工作表,然后调用基Dispose(()。

注意:我添加了一些扩展方法,用于迭代Workbook.Worksheets。如果您遇到编译错误,这就是原因。我将在末尾添加扩展方法。

public class ExcelWorkbook : DisposableComObject<Workbook>
{
    public class WorksheetNotFoundException : Exception
    {
        public WorksheetNotFoundException(string message) : base(message) { }
    }

    /// <summary>The actual Workbook from Interop.Excel</summary>
    Workbook Workbook => ComObject;

    /// <summary>The worksheets within the workbook</summary>
    public IEnumerable<ExcelWorksheet> Worksheets => worksheets ?? (worksheets = Workbook.Worksheets.AsEnumerable<Worksheet>().Select(w => new ExcelWorksheet(w)).ToList());
    private IEnumerable<ExcelWorksheet> worksheets;

    public ExcelWorkbook(Workbook workbook) : base(workbook) { }

    /// <summary>
    /// Get the worksheet matching the <paramref name="sheetName"/>
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="sheetName">The name of the Worksheet</param>
    public ExcelWorksheet Worksheet(string sheetName) => Worksheet(s => s.Name == sheetName, () => $"Worksheet not found: {sheetName}");

    /// <summary>
    /// Get the worksheet matching the <paramref name="predicate"/>
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="predicate">A function to test each Worksheet for a macth</param>
    public ExcelWorksheet Worksheet(Func<ExcelWorksheet, bool> predicate, Func<string> errorMessageAction) => Worksheets.FirstOrDefault(predicate) ??  throw new WorksheetNotFoundException(errorMessageAction.Invoke());

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns true of the workbook is read-only
    /// </summary>
    public bool IsReadOnly() => Workbook.ReadOnly;

    /// <summary>
    /// Save changes made to the workbook
    /// </summary>
    public void Save()
    {
        Workbook.Save();
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Close the workbook and optionally save changes
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="saveChanges">True is save before close</param>
    public void Close(bool saveChanges)
    {
        if (saveChanges) Save();
        Dispose(true);
    }

    /// <inheritdoc/>
    protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!disposing || IsDisposed()) return;
        Workbook.Close();
        base.Dispose(disposing);
    }
}

最后是ExcelWorksheet。

UsedRows()只返回未展开的Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Range对象的可枚举值。我还没有遇到这样的情况,即从Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Worksheet对象的财产访问的COM对象需要手动包装,就像应用程序、工作簿和工作表需要那样。这些似乎都能自动清理它们。大多数情况下,我只是在Ranges上迭代并获取或设置值,所以我的特定用例不如可用功能那么先进。

在这种情况下,不需要重写Dispose(),因为不需要对工作表执行任何特殊操作。

public class ExcelWorksheet : DisposableComObject<Worksheet>
{
    /// <summary>The actual Worksheet from Interop.Excel</summary>
    Worksheet Worksheet => ComObject;

    /// <summary>The worksheet name</summary>
    public string Name => Worksheet.Name;

    // <summary>The worksheets cells (Unwrapped COM object)</summary>
    public Range Cells => Worksheet.Cells;

    public ExcelWorksheet(Worksheet worksheet) : base(worksheet) { }

    /// <inheritdoc cref="WorksheetExtensions.UsedRows(Worksheet)"/>
    public IEnumerable<Range> UsedRows() => Worksheet.UsedRows().ToList();
}

可以添加更多的包装类。只需根据需要向ExcelWorksheet添加其他方法,并在包装类中返回COM对象。只需复制我们通过ExcelApplication.OpenWorkbook()和ExcelWorkbook.WorkSheets包装工作簿时所做的操作。

一些有用的扩展方法:

public static class EnumeratorExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Converts the <paramref name="enumerator"/> to an IEnumerable of type <typeparamref name="T"/>
    /// </summary>
    public static IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable<T>(this IEnumerable enumerator)
    {
        return enumerator.GetEnumerator().AsEnumerable<T>();
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Converts the <paramref name="enumerator"/> to an IEnumerable of type <typeparamref name="T"/>
    /// </summary>
    public static IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable<T>(this IEnumerator enumerator)
    {
        while (enumerator.MoveNext()) yield return (T)enumerator.Current;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Converts the <paramref name="enumerator"/> to an IEnumerable of type <typeparamref name="T"/>
    /// </summary>
    public static IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable<T>(this IEnumerator<T> enumerator)
    {
        while (enumerator.MoveNext()) yield return enumerator.Current;
    }
}

public static class WorksheetExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Returns the rows within the used range of this <paramref name="worksheet"/>
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="worksheet">The worksheet</param>
    public static IEnumerable<Range> UsedRows(this Worksheet worksheet) =>
        worksheet.UsedRange.Rows.AsEnumerable<Range>();
}

这是唯一对我有效的方法

        foreach (Process proc in System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcessesByName("EXCEL"))
        {
            proc.Kill();
        }

确保释放所有与Excel相关的对象!

我花了几个小时尝试了几种方法。所有这些都是好主意,但我终于发现了我的错误:如果你不释放所有对象,上面的任何方法都不能像我这样帮助你。确保释放所有对象,包括范围1!

Excel.Range rng = (Excel.Range)worksheet.Cells[1, 1];
worksheet.Paste(rng, false);
releaseObject(rng);

这里有各种选项。