让我们把你的优秀和最喜欢的扩展方法列一个列表。
要求是必须发布完整的代码,以及如何使用它的示例和解释。
基于对这个主题的高度兴趣,我在Codeplex上建立了一个名为extensionoverflow的开源项目。
请将您的回答标记为接受,以便将代码放入Codeplex项目。
请张贴完整的源代码,而不是一个链接。
Codeplex上新闻:
24.08.2010 Codeplex页面现在在这里:http://extensionoverflow.codeplex.com/
11.11.2008 XmlSerialize / XmlDeserialize现在是实现和单元测试。
11.11.2008仍有发展空间。;-)现在就加入!
11.11.2008第三位贡献者加入了ExtensionOverflow,欢迎加入BKristensen
11.11.2008 FormatWith现在是实现和单元测试。
09.11.2008第二个贡献者加入ExtensionOverflow。欢迎来到chakrit。
我们需要更多的开发人员。: -)
09.11.2008 ThrowIfArgumentIsNull现已在Codeplex上实现和单元测试。
c#中Smalltalk样式的if/else。
您可以自由地在codeplex上使用您使用的任何许可证
using System;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods
{
public static class BooleanExtension
{
public static T ifTrue<T> (this bool aBoolean, Func<T> method)
{
if (aBoolean)
return (T)method();
else
return default(T);
}
public static void ifTrue (this bool aBoolean, Action method)
{
if (aBoolean)
method();
}
public static T ifFalse<T> (this bool aBoolean, Func<T> method)
{
if (!aBoolean)
return (T)method();
else
return default(T);
}
public static void ifFalse (this bool aBoolean, Action method)
{
if (!aBoolean)
method();
}
public static T ifTrueifFalse<T> (this Boolean aBoolean, Func<T> methodA, Func<T> methodB)
{
if (aBoolean)
return (T)methodA();
else
return (T)methodB();
}
public static void ifTrueifFalse (this Boolean aBoolean, Action methodA, Action methodB)
{
if (aBoolean)
methodA();
else
methodB();
}
}
}
你可能已经有了一个timesRepeat方法。
using System;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods
{
public static class IntExtension
{
public static int timesRepeat<T>(this int x, Func<T> method)
{
for (int i = x; i > 0; i--)
{
method();
}
return x;
}
public static int timesRepeat(this int x, Action method)
{
for (int i = x; i > 0; i--)
{
method();
}
return x;
}
}
}
Nunit测试
using System;
using SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethods;
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace SmalltalkBooleanExtensionMethodsTest
{
[TestFixture]
public class SBEMTest
{
int i;
bool itWorks;
[SetUp]
public void Init()
{
i = 0;
itWorks = false;
}
[Test()]
public void TestifTrue()
{
itWorks = (true.ifTrue(() => true));
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestifFalse()
{
itWorks = (false.ifFalse(() => true));
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestifTrueifFalse()
{
itWorks = false.ifTrueifFalse(() => false, () => true);
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
itWorks = false;
itWorks = true.ifTrueifFalse(() => true, () => false);
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestTimesRepeat()
{
(5).timesRepeat(() => i = i + 1);
Assert.AreEqual(i, 5);
}
[Test()]
public void TestVoidMethodIfTrue()
{
true.ifTrue(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
[Test()]
public void TestVoidMethodIfFalse()
{
false.ifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
public void TestVoidMethodIfTrueIfFalse()
{
true.ifTrueifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue(), () => SetItWorksBooleanToFalse());
false.ifTrueifFalse(() => SetItWorksBooleanToFalse(), () => SetItWorksBooleanToTrue());
Assert.IsTrue(itWorks);
}
public void TestVoidMethodTimesRepeat()
{
(5).timesRepeat(() => AddOneToi());
Assert.AreEqual(i, 5);
}
public void SetItWorksBooleanToTrue()
{
itWorks = true;
}
public void SetItWorksBooleanToFalse()
{
itWorks = false;
}
public void AddOneToi()
{
i = i + 1;
}
}
}
// This file contains extension methods for generic List<> class to operate on sorted lists.
// Duplicate values are OK.
// O(ln(n)) is still much faster then the O(n) of LINQ's searches/filters.
static partial class SortedList
{
// Return the index of the first element with the key greater then provided.
// If there's no such element within the provided range, it returns iAfterLast.
public static int sortedFirstGreaterIndex<tElt, tKey>( this IList<tElt> list, Func<tElt, tKey, int> comparer, tKey key, int iFirst, int iAfterLast )
{
if( iFirst < 0 || iAfterLast < 0 || iFirst > list.Count || iAfterLast > list.Count )
throw new IndexOutOfRangeException();
if( iFirst > iAfterLast )
throw new ArgumentException();
if( iFirst == iAfterLast )
return iAfterLast;
int low = iFirst, high = iAfterLast;
// The code below is inspired by the following article:
// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search#Single_comparison_per_iteration
while( low < high )
{
int mid = ( high + low ) / 2;
// 'mid' might be 'iFirst' in case 'iFirst+1 == iAfterLast'.
// 'mid' will never be 'iAfterLast'.
if( comparer( list[ mid ], key ) <= 0 ) // "<=" since we gonna find the first "greater" element
low = mid + 1;
else
high = mid;
}
return low;
}
// Return the index of the first element with the key greater then the provided key.
// If there's no such element, returns list.Count.
public static int sortedFirstGreaterIndex<tElt, tKey>( this IList<tElt> list, Func<tElt, tKey, int> comparer, tKey key )
{
return list.sortedFirstGreaterIndex( comparer, key, 0, list.Count );
}
// Add an element to the sorted array.
// This could be an expensive operation if frequently adding elements that sort firstly.
// This is cheap operation when adding elements that sort near the tail of the list.
public static int sortedAdd<tElt>( this List<tElt> list, Func<tElt, tElt, int> comparer, tElt elt )
{
if( list.Count == 0 || comparer( list[ list.Count - 1 ], elt ) <= 0 )
{
// either the list is empty, or the item is greater then all elements already in the collection.
list.Add( elt );
return list.Count - 1;
}
int ind = list.sortedFirstGreaterIndex( comparer, elt );
list.Insert( ind, elt );
return ind;
}
// Find first exactly equal element, return -1 if not found.
public static int sortedFindFirstIndex<tElt, tKey>( this List<tElt> list, Func<tElt, tKey, int> comparer, tKey elt )
{
int low = 0, high = list.Count - 1;
while( low < high )
{
int mid = ( high + low ) / 2;
if( comparer( list[ mid ], elt ) < 0 )
low = mid + 1;
else
high = mid; // this includes the case when we've found an element exactly matching the key
}
if( high >= 0 && 0 == comparer( list[ high ], elt ) )
return high;
return -1;
}
// Return the IEnumerable that returns array elements in the reverse order.
public static IEnumerable<tElt> sortedReverse<tElt>( this List<tElt> list )
{
for( int i=list.Count - 1; i >= 0; i-- )
yield return list[ i ];
}
}
而与MVC工作,有很多if语句,我只关心或真或假,打印null,或字符串。在另一种情况下,我想到了:
public static TResult WhenTrue<TResult>(this Boolean value, Func<TResult> expression)
{
return value ? expression() : default(TResult);
}
public static TResult WhenTrue<TResult>(this Boolean value, TResult content)
{
return value ? content : default(TResult);
}
public static TResult WhenFalse<TResult>(this Boolean value, Func<TResult> expression)
{
return !value ? expression() : default(TResult);
}
public static TResult WhenFalse<TResult>(this Boolean value, TResult content)
{
return !value ? content : default(TResult);
}
它允许我改变<%= (someBool) ?print y:字符串。将%>空为<%= someBool。WhenTrue("print y") %>。
我只在我的视图中使用它,在这里我混合了代码和HTML,在代码文件中编写“更长的”版本更清楚。
NullPartial用于ASP MVC的HTML helper。
当传递一个空模型时,HTML。Partial和HTML。RenderPartial将提供视图的模型,如果这个部分是强类型的,而视图有不同的类型,它将抛出一个异常,而不是传递一个空引用。这些帮助程序允许您指定两个不同的部分,这样您就可以将空测试排除在视图之外。
您有权在Codeplex页面上包含此内容
public static class nullpartials
{
public static MvcHtmlString NullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model)
{
if (Model == null)
return helper.Partial(NullPartial);
else
return helper.Partial(Partial, Model);
}
public static MvcHtmlString NullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model, ViewDataDictionary viewdata)
{
if (Model == null)
return helper.Partial(NullPartial, viewdata);
else
return helper.Partial(Partial, Model, viewdata);
}
public static void RenderNullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model)
{
if (Model == null)
{
helper.RenderPartial(NullPartial);
return;
}
else
{
helper.RenderPartial(Partial, Model);
return;
}
}
public static void RenderNullPartial(this HtmlHelper helper, string Partial, string NullPartial, object Model, ViewDataDictionary viewdata)
{
if (Model == null)
{
helper.RenderPartial(NullPartial, viewdata);
return;
}
else
{
helper.RenderPartial(Partial, Model, viewdata);
return;
}
}
}