无论如何，把它放在codeplex项目中。

将对象序列化/反序列化为XML:

/// <summary>Serializes an object of type T in to an xml string</summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Any class type</typeparam>
/// <param name="obj">Object to serialize</param>
/// <returns>A string that represents Xml, empty otherwise</returns>
public static string XmlSerialize<T>(this T obj) where T : class, new()
{
    if (obj == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("obj");

    var serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
    using (var writer = new StringWriter())
    {
        serializer.Serialize(writer, obj);
        return writer.ToString();
    }
}

/// <summary>Deserializes an xml string in to an object of Type T</summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">Any class type</typeparam>
/// <param name="xml">Xml as string to deserialize from</param>
/// <returns>A new object of type T is successful, null if failed</returns>
public static T XmlDeserialize<T>(this string xml) where T : class, new()
{
    if (xml == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("xml");

    var serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
    using (var reader = new StringReader(xml))
    {
        try { return (T)serializer.Deserialize(reader); }
        catch { return null; } // Could not be deserialized to this type.
    }
}

python字典方法:

/// <summary>
/// If a key exists in a dictionary, return its value, 
/// otherwise return the default value for that type.
/// </summary>
public static U GetWithDefault<T, U>(this Dictionary<T, U> dict, T key)
{
    return dict.GetWithDefault(key, default(U));
}

/// <summary>
/// If a key exists in a dictionary, return its value,
/// otherwise return the provided default value.
/// </summary>
public static U GetWithDefault<T, U>(this Dictionary<T, U> dict, T key, U defaultValue)
{
    return dict.ContainsKey(key)
        ? dict[key]
        : defaultValue;
}

当您希望将时间戳附加到文件名以确保唯一性时非常有用。

/// <summary>
/// Format a DateTime as a string that contains no characters
//// that are banned from filenames, such as ':'.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>YYYY-MM-DD_HH.MM.SS</returns>
public static string ToFilenameString(this DateTime dt)
{
    return dt.ToString("s").Replace(":", ".").Replace('T', '_');
}

我喜欢下面这些方法来处理带有Flags属性集的枚举:

public static bool AnyOf(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return ((int)mask & (int)flags) != 0;
}
public static bool AllOf(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return ((int)mask & (int)flags) == (int)flags;
}
public static object SetOn(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return (int)mask | (int)flags;
}
etc.

使用示例:

var options = SomeOptions.OptionA;
options = options.SetOn(OptionB);
options = options.SetOn(OptionC);

if (options.AnyOf(SomeOptions.OptionA | SomeOptions.OptionB))
{
etc.

原始方法来自本文:http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/masksandflags.aspx?display=Print 我只是把它们转换成扩展方法。

但它们的一个问题是对象类型的参数，这意味着所有对象最终都被这些方法扩展，而理想情况下，它们应该只应用于枚举。

更新 根据评论，你可以绕过“签名污染”，以牺牲性能为代价，如下所示:

public static bool AnyOf(this Enum mask, object flags)
{
    return (Convert.ToInt642(mask) & (int)flags) != 0;
}

讨厌这种代码?

CloneableClass cc1 = new CloneableClass ();
CloneableClass cc2 = null;
CloneableClass cc3 = null;

cc3 = (CloneableClass) cc1.Clone (); // this is ok
cc3 = cc2.Clone (); // this throws null ref exception
// code to handle both cases
cc3 = cc1 != null ? (CloneableClass) cc1.Clone () : null;

它有点笨拙，所以我用这个扩展替换它，我称之为CloneOrNull -

public static T CloneOrNull<T> (this T self) where T : class, ICloneable
{
    if (self == null) return null;
    return (T) self.Clone ();
}

用法如下:

CloneableClass cc1 = new CloneableClass ();
CloneableClass cc2 = null;
CloneableClass cc3 = null;

cc3 = cc1.CloneOrNull (); // clone of cc1
cc3 = cc2.CloneOrNull (); // null
// look mom, no casts!

请随意在任何地方使用这个!

这是ThrowIfNull的另一个实现:

[ThreadStatic]
private static string lastMethodName = null;

[ThreadStatic]
private static int lastParamIndex = 0;

[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]
public static void ThrowIfNull<T>(this T parameter)
{
    var currentStackFrame = new StackFrame(1);
    var props = currentStackFrame.GetMethod().GetParameters();

    if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(lastMethodName)) {
        if (currentStackFrame.GetMethod().Name != lastMethodName) {
            lastParamIndex = 0;
        } else if (lastParamIndex >= props.Length - 1) {
            lastParamIndex = 0;
        } else {
            lastParamIndex++;
        }
    } else {
        lastParamIndex = 0;
    }

    if (!typeof(T).IsValueType) {
        for (int i = lastParamIndex; i &lt; props.Length; i++) {
            if (props[i].ParameterType.IsValueType) {
                lastParamIndex++;
            } else {
                break;
            }
        }
    }

    if (parameter == null) {
        string paramName = props[lastParamIndex].Name;
        throw new ArgumentNullException(paramName);
    }

    lastMethodName = currentStackFrame.GetMethod().Name;
}

它不像其他实现那样高效，但有更干净的用法:

public void Foo()
{
    Bar(1, 2, "Hello", "World"); //no exception
    Bar(1, 2, "Hello", null); //exception
    Bar(1, 2, null, "World"); //exception
}

public void Bar(int x, int y, string someString1, string someString2)
{
    //will also work with comments removed
    //x.ThrowIfNull();
    //y.ThrowIfNull();
    someString1.ThrowIfNull();
    someString2.ThrowIfNull();

    //Do something incredibly useful here!
}

改变参数为int?也会起作用。

那

我很失望，. net框架更倾向于将文件和目录表示为字符串而不是对象，而且FileInfo和DirectoryInfo类型并不像我希望的那样强大。因此，我开始根据需要编写流畅的扩展方法，例如:

public static FileInfo SetExtension(this FileInfo fileInfo, string extension)
{
    return new FileInfo(Path.ChangeExtension(fileInfo.FullName, extension));
}

public static FileInfo SetDirectory(this FileInfo fileInfo, string directory)
{
    return new FileInfo(Path.Combine(directory, fileInfo.Name));
}

是的，你可以把这个放进codeplex