让我们把你的优秀和最喜欢的扩展方法列一个列表。
要求是必须发布完整的代码,以及如何使用它的示例和解释。
基于对这个主题的高度兴趣,我在Codeplex上建立了一个名为extensionoverflow的开源项目。
请将您的回答标记为接受,以便将代码放入Codeplex项目。
请张贴完整的源代码,而不是一个链接。
Codeplex上新闻:
24.08.2010 Codeplex页面现在在这里:http://extensionoverflow.codeplex.com/
11.11.2008 XmlSerialize / XmlDeserialize现在是实现和单元测试。
11.11.2008仍有发展空间。;-)现在就加入!
11.11.2008第三位贡献者加入了ExtensionOverflow,欢迎加入BKristensen
11.11.2008 FormatWith现在是实现和单元测试。
09.11.2008第二个贡献者加入ExtensionOverflow。欢迎来到chakrit。
我们需要更多的开发人员。: -)
09.11.2008 ThrowIfArgumentIsNull现已在Codeplex上实现和单元测试。
public static class EnumerableExtensions
{
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(enumerable != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(enumerable.Skip(1).Any());
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
return enumerable.AsParallel().Select(map).Aggregate(reduce);
}
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IList<T> list, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list.Count >= 2);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
U result = map(list[0]);
for (int i = 1; i < list.Count; i++)
{
result = reduce(result,map(list[i]));
}
return result;
}
//Parallel version; creates garbage
[Pure]
public static U MapReduce<T, U>(this IList<T> list, Func<T, U> map, Func<U, U, U> reduce)
{
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(list.Skip(1).Any());
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(map != null);
CodeContract.RequiresAlways(reduce != null);
U[] mapped = new U[list.Count];
Parallel.For(0, mapped.Length, i =>
{
mapped[i] = map(list[i]);
});
U result = mapped[0];
for (int i = 1; i < list.Count; i++)
{
result = reduce(result, mapped[i]);
}
return result;
}
}
通配符字符串比较:
public static bool MatchesWildcard(this string text, string pattern)
{
int it = 0;
while (text.CharAt(it) != 0 &&
pattern.CharAt(it) != '*')
{
if (pattern.CharAt(it) != text.CharAt(it) && pattern.CharAt(it) != '?')
return false;
it++;
}
int cp = 0;
int mp = 0;
int ip = it;
while (text.CharAt(it) != 0)
{
if (pattern.CharAt(ip) == '*')
{
if (pattern.CharAt(++ip) == 0)
return true;
mp = ip;
cp = it + 1;
}
else if (pattern.CharAt(ip) == text.CharAt(it) || pattern.CharAt(ip) == '?')
{
ip++;
it++;
}
else
{
ip = mp;
it = cp++;
}
}
while (pattern.CharAt(ip) == '*')
{
ip++;
}
return pattern.CharAt(ip) == 0;
}
public static char CharAt(this string s, int index)
{
if (index < s.Length)
return s[index];
return '\0';
}
它直接翻译了本文中的C代码,因此CharAt方法将字符串的末尾返回0
if (fileName.MatchesWildcard("*.cs"))
{
Console.WriteLine("{0} is a C# source file", fileName);
}
Sql server有~2000个参数的限制,如果你有10k个id并想要与它们连接的记录,这是一个痛苦。我写了这些方法,接受批量id列表,并像这样调用:
List<Order> orders = dataContext.Orders.FetchByIds(
orderIdChunks,
list => row => list.Contains(row.OrderId)
);
List<Customer> customers = dataContext.Orders.FetchByIds(
orderIdChunks,
list => row => list.Contains(row.OrderId),
row => row.Customer
);
public static List<ResultType> FetchByIds<RecordType, ResultType>(
this IQueryable<RecordType> querySource,
List<List<int>> IdChunks,
Func<List<int>, Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>>> filterExpressionGenerator,
Expression<Func<RecordType, ResultType>> projectionExpression
) where RecordType : class
{
List<ResultType> result = new List<ResultType>();
foreach (List<int> chunk in IdChunks)
{
Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>> filterExpression =
filterExpressionGenerator(chunk);
IQueryable<ResultType> query = querySource
.Where(filterExpression)
.Select(projectionExpression);
List<ResultType> rows = query.ToList();
result.AddRange(rows);
}
return result;
}
public static List<RecordType> FetchByIds<RecordType>(
this IQueryable<RecordType> querySource,
List<List<int>> IdChunks,
Func<List<int>, Expression<Func<RecordType, bool>>> filterExpressionGenerator
) where RecordType : class
{
Expression<Func<RecordType, RecordType>> identity = r => r;
return FetchByIds(
querySource,
IdChunks,
filterExpressionGenerator,
identity
);
}