我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
我的单例访问方法通常是一些变种:
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
return(gInstance);
}
我能做些什么来改善这一点呢?
当前回答
我的方法很简单:
static id instanceOfXXX = nil;
+ (id) sharedXXX
{
static volatile BOOL initialized = NO;
if (!initialized)
{
@synchronized([XXX class])
{
if (!initialized)
{
instanceOfXXX = [[XXX alloc] init];
initialized = YES;
}
}
}
return instanceOfXXX;
}
如果单例已经初始化,LOCK块将不会被输入。第二次检查if(!initialized)是为了确保当前线程获得LOCK时它还没有初始化。
其他回答
我知道有很多关于这个“问题”的评论,但是我没有看到很多人建议使用宏来定义单例对象。这是一个非常常见的模式,一个宏极大地简化了单例。
下面是我根据我见过的几个Objc实现编写的宏。
Singeton。h
/**
@abstract Helps define the interface of a singleton.
@param TYPE The type of this singleton.
@param NAME The name of the singleton accessor. Must match the name used in the implementation.
@discussion
Typcially the NAME is something like 'sharedThing' where 'Thing' is the prefix-removed type name of the class.
*/
#define SingletonInterface(TYPE, NAME) \
+ (TYPE *)NAME;
/**
@abstract Helps define the implementation of a singleton.
@param TYPE The type of this singleton.
@param NAME The name of the singleton accessor. Must match the name used in the interface.
@discussion
Typcially the NAME is something like 'sharedThing' where 'Thing' is the prefix-removed type name of the class.
*/
#define SingletonImplementation(TYPE, NAME) \
static TYPE *__ ## NAME; \
\
\
+ (void)initialize \
{ \
static BOOL initialized = NO; \
if(!initialized) \
{ \
initialized = YES; \
__ ## NAME = [[TYPE alloc] init]; \
} \
} \
\
\
+ (TYPE *)NAME \
{ \
return __ ## NAME; \
}
使用示例:
我的经理
@interface MyManager
SingletonInterface(MyManager, sharedManager);
// ...
@end
我的经理
@implementation MyManager
- (id)init
{
self = [super init];
if (self) {
// Initialization code here.
}
return self;
}
SingletonImplementation(MyManager, sharedManager);
// ...
@end
为什么界面宏几乎是空的?头文件和代码文件之间的代码一致性;可维护性,以防您想添加更多的自动方法或更改它。
我使用initialize方法创建单例,就像这里(在撰写本文时)最流行的答案中使用的那样。
@interface MySingleton : NSObject
{
}
+ (MySingleton *)sharedSingleton;
@end
@implementation MySingleton
+ (MySingleton *)sharedSingleton
{
static MySingleton *sharedSingleton;
@synchronized(self)
{
if (!sharedSingleton)
sharedSingleton = [[MySingleton alloc] init];
return sharedSingleton;
}
}
@end
(来源)
如何
static MyClass *gInstance = NULL;
+ (MyClass *)instance
{
if (gInstance == NULL) {
@synchronized(self)
{
if (gInstance == NULL)
gInstance = [[self alloc] init];
}
}
return(gInstance);
}
这样就避免了初始化后的同步成本?
我没有读完所有的解,所以如果这段代码是多余的,请原谅。
在我看来,这是最线程安全的实现。
+(SingletonObject *) sharedManager
{
static SingletonObject * sharedResourcesObj = nil;
@synchronized(self)
{
if (!sharedResourcesObj)
{
sharedResourcesObj = [[SingletonObject alloc] init];
}
}
return sharedResourcesObj;
}
static mySingleton *obj=nil;
@implementation mySingleton
-(id) init {
if(obj != nil){
[self release];
return obj;
} else if(self = [super init]) {
obj = self;
}
return obj;
}
+(mySingleton*) getSharedInstance {
@synchronized(self){
if(obj == nil) {
obj = [[mySingleton alloc] init];
}
}
return obj;
}
- (id)retain {
return self;
}
- (id)copy {
return self;
}
- (unsigned)retainCount {
return UINT_MAX; // denotes an object that cannot be released
}
- (void)release {
if(obj != self){
[super release];
}
//do nothing
}
- (id)autorelease {
return self;
}
-(void) dealloc {
[super dealloc];
}
@end