我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y,这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题,因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象?
当前回答
由于mindeeavor指出要克隆的对象是一个“字面构造的”对象,因此解决方案可能是简单地多次生成对象,而不是克隆对象的实例:
function createMyObject()
{
var myObject =
{
...
};
return myObject;
}
var myObjectInstance1 = createMyObject();
var myObjectInstance2 = createMyObject();
其他回答
根据Airbnb JavaScript风格指南,有404位贡献者:
首选对象排列运算符而不是对象。指定为浅层复制物体。使用object rest操作符获取具有特定省略了财产。
// very bad
const original = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const copy = Object.assign(original, { c: 3 }); // this mutates `original` ಠ_ಠ
delete copy.a; // so does this
// bad
const original = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const copy = Object.assign({}, original, { c: 3 }); // copy => { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 }
// good
const original = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const copy = { ...original, c: 3 }; // copy => { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 }
const { a, ...noA } = copy; // noA => { b: 2, c: 3 }
此外,我想提醒您,尽管Airbnb几乎不建议使用对象扩散运算符方法。请记住,Microsoft Edge仍然不支持此2018功能。
ES2016+公司表>>
根据Apple JavaScript编码指南:
// Create an inner object with a variable x whose default
// value is 3.
function innerObj()
{
this.x = 3;
}
innerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new innerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
// this object does not contain any objects, so
// use the lightweight copy code.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
return temp;
}
// Create an outer object with a variable y whose default
// value is 77.
function outerObj()
{
// The outer object contains an inner object. Allocate it here.
this.inner = new innerObj();
this.y = 77;
}
outerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new outerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
if (this[myvar].clone) {
// This variable contains an object with a
// clone operator. Call it to create a copy.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar].clone();
} else {
// This variable contains a scalar value,
// a string value, or an object with no
// clone function. Assign it directly.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
}
return temp;
}
// Allocate an outer object and assign non-default values to variables in
// both the outer and inner objects.
outer = new outerObj;
outer.inner.x = 4;
outer.y = 16;
// Clone the outer object (which, in turn, clones the inner object).
newouter = outer.clone();
// Verify that both values were copied.
alert('inner x is '+newouter.inner.x); // prints 4
alert('y is '+newouter.y); // prints 16
史蒂夫
基于模板克隆对象。如果您不想要精确的副本,但确实想要某种可靠的克隆操作的健壮性,但您只想要克隆位,或者希望确保可以控制每个属性值的存在或格式,该怎么办?
我之所以这么做,是因为它对我们有用,我们之所以创建它,是因为我们找不到类似的东西。您可以使用它来基于模板对象克隆对象,该模板对象指定了要克隆的对象的属性,如果源对象上不存在这些属性,或者您希望如何处理克隆,则模板允许函数将这些属性转换为不同的属性。如果没有用,我相信有人可以删除这个答案。
function isFunction(functionToCheck) {
var getType = {};
return functionToCheck && getType.toString.call(functionToCheck) === '[object Function]';
}
function cloneObjectByTemplate(obj, tpl, cloneConstructor) {
if (typeof cloneConstructor === "undefined") {
cloneConstructor = false;
}
if (obj == null || typeof (obj) != 'object') return obj;
//if we have an array, work through it's contents and apply the template to each item...
if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
var ret = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; i++) {
ret.push(cloneObjectByTemplate(obj[i], tpl, cloneConstructor));
}
return ret;
}
//otherwise we have an object...
//var temp:any = {}; // obj.constructor(); // we can't call obj.constructor because typescript defines this, so if we are dealing with a typescript object it might reset values.
var temp = cloneConstructor ? new obj.constructor() : {};
for (var key in tpl) {
//if we are provided with a function to determine the value of this property, call it...
if (isFunction(tpl[key])) {
temp[key] = tpl[key](obj); //assign the result of the function call, passing in the value
} else {
//if our object has this property...
if (obj[key] != undefined) {
if (Array.isArray(obj[key])) {
temp[key] = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj[key].length; i++) {
temp[key].push(cloneObjectByTemplate(obj[key][i], tpl[key], cloneConstructor));
}
} else {
temp[key] = cloneObjectByTemplate(obj[key], tpl[key], cloneConstructor);
}
}
}
}
return temp;
}
一个简单的调用方法如下:
var source = {
a: "whatever",
b: {
x: "yeah",
y: "haha"
}
};
var template = {
a: true, //we want to clone "a"
b: {
x: true //we want to clone "b.x" too
}
};
var destination = cloneObjectByTemplate(source, template);
如果您想使用函数来确保返回属性或确保它是特定类型,请使用这样的模板。我们提供了一个函数,它仍然只是复制源对象的ID属性,但它确保它是一个数字,即使它不存在于源对象上。
var template = {
ID: function (srcObj) {
if(srcObj.ID == undefined){ return -1; }
return parseInt(srcObj.ID.toString());
}
}
数组可以很好地进行克隆,但如果您愿意,也可以使用自己的函数来处理这些单独的属性,并执行以下特殊操作:
var template = {
tags: function (srcObj) {
var tags = [];
if (process.tags != undefined) {
for (var i = 0; i < process.tags.length; i++) {
tags.push(cloneObjectByTemplate(
srcObj.tags[i],
{ a : true, b : true } //another template for each item in the array
);
}
}
return tags;
}
}
所以在上面,我们的模板只复制源对象的标签属性(如果它存在的话)(假设它是一个数组),并且对该数组中的每个元素调用clone函数,根据第二个模板单独克隆它,该模板只复制这些标签元素的a和b属性。
如果您要将对象移入和移出节点,并且希望控制这些对象的哪些属性被克隆,那么这是在node.js中控制这些属性的一种很好的方法,代码也可以在浏览器中工作。
下面是它的用法示例:http://jsfiddle.net/hjchyLt1/
您可以克隆一个对象,并使用一行代码从上一个对象中删除任何引用。只需执行以下操作:
var obj1 = { text: 'moo1' };
var obj2 = Object.create(obj1); // Creates a new clone without references
obj2.text = 'moo2'; // Only updates obj2's text property
console.log(obj1, obj2); // Outputs: obj1: {text:'moo1'}, obj2: {text:'moo2'}
对于当前不支持Object.create的浏览器/引擎,可以使用以下polyfill:
// Polyfill Object.create if it does not exist
if (!Object.create) {
Object.create = function (o) {
var F = function () {};
F.prototype = o;
return new F();
};
}
这是对A.Levy代码的修改,以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着,如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用,则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题,如果不加以处理,就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O(n)
function clone(obj){
var clonedObjectsArray = [];
var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
var next_objid = 0;
function objectId(obj) {
if (obj == null) return null;
if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
}
return obj.__obj_id;
}
function cloneRecursive(obj) {
if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;
// Handle Date
if (obj instanceof Date) {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
return copy;
}
// Handle Array
if (obj instanceof Array) {
var copy = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
}
return copy;
}
// Handle Object
if (obj instanceof Object) {
if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];
var copy;
if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
else
copy = {};
clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;
for (var attr in obj)
if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);
return copy;
}
throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}
var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);
//remove the unique ids
for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
{
delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
};
return cloneObj;
}
一些快速测试
var auxobj = {
prop1 : "prop1 aux val",
prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
};
var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;
obj.f1 = function (){
this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};
objclone = clone(obj);
//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));
objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));
objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));