我有一个对象x。我想将其复制为对象y，这样对y的更改不会修改x。我意识到复制从内置JavaScript对象派生的对象会导致额外的、不需要的财产。这不是问题，因为我正在复制我自己的一个文字构造对象。
如何正确克隆JavaScript对象？
当前回答
我认为，在没有库的情况下，缓存的重复性是最好的。
被低估的WeakMap涉及到循环的问题，其中存储对新旧对象的引用可以帮助我们很容易地重建整个树。
我阻止了DOM元素的深度克隆，可能您不想克隆整个页面：）
function deepCopy(object) {
const cache = new WeakMap(); // Map of old - new references
function copy(obj) {
if (typeof obj !== 'object' ||
obj === null ||
obj instanceof HTMLElement
)
return obj; // primitive value or HTMLElement
if (obj instanceof Date)
return new Date().setTime(obj.getTime());
if (obj instanceof RegExp)
return new RegExp(obj.source, obj.flags);
if (cache.has(obj))
return cache.get(obj);
const result = obj instanceof Array ? [] : {};
cache.set(obj, result); // store reference to object before the recursive starts
if (obj instanceof Array) {
for(const o of obj) {
result.push(copy(o));
}
return result;
}
const keys = Object.keys(obj);
for (const key of keys)
result[key] = copy(obj[key]);
return result;
}
return copy(object);
}
一些测试：
// #1
const obj1 = { };
const obj2 = { };
obj1.obj2 = obj2;
obj2.obj1 = obj1; // Trivial circular reference
var copy = deepCopy(obj1);
copy == obj1 // false
copy.obj2 === obj1.obj2 // false
copy.obj2.obj1.obj2 // and so on - no error (correctly cloned).
// #2
const obj = { x: 0 }
const clone = deepCopy({ a: obj, b: obj });
clone.a == clone.b // true
// #3
const arr = [];
arr[0] = arr; // A little bit weird but who cares
clone = deepCopy(arr)
clone == arr // false;
clone[0][0][0][0] == clone // true;
注意：我使用常量、for of循环、=>运算符和WeakMaps来创建更重要的代码。当前的浏览器支持此语法（ES6）
其他回答
这是对A.Levy代码的修改，以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着，如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用，则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题，如果不加以处理，就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O（n）
function clone(obj){
var clonedObjectsArray = [];
var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
var next_objid = 0;
function objectId(obj) {
if (obj == null) return null;
if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
}
return obj.__obj_id;
}
function cloneRecursive(obj) {
if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;
// Handle Date
if (obj instanceof Date) {
var copy = new Date();
copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
return copy;
}
// Handle Array
if (obj instanceof Array) {
var copy = [];
for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
}
return copy;
}
// Handle Object
if (obj instanceof Object) {
if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];
var copy;
if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
else
copy = {};
clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;
for (var attr in obj)
if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);
return copy;
}
throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
}
var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);
//remove the unique ids
for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
{
delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
};
return cloneObj;
}
一些快速测试
var auxobj = {
prop1 : "prop1 aux val",
prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
};
var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;
obj.f1 = function (){
this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};
objclone = clone(obj);
//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));
objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));
objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));
根据Apple JavaScript编码指南：
// Create an inner object with a variable x whose default
// value is 3.
function innerObj()
{
this.x = 3;
}
innerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new innerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
// this object does not contain any objects, so
// use the lightweight copy code.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
return temp;
}
// Create an outer object with a variable y whose default
// value is 77.
function outerObj()
{
// The outer object contains an inner object. Allocate it here.
this.inner = new innerObj();
this.y = 77;
}
outerObj.prototype.clone = function() {
var temp = new outerObj();
for (myvar in this) {
if (this[myvar].clone) {
// This variable contains an object with a
// clone operator. Call it to create a copy.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar].clone();
} else {
// This variable contains a scalar value,
// a string value, or an object with no
// clone function. Assign it directly.
temp[myvar] = this[myvar];
}
}
return temp;
}
// Allocate an outer object and assign non-default values to variables in
// both the outer and inner objects.
outer = new outerObj;
outer.inner.x = 4;
outer.y = 16;
// Clone the outer object (which, in turn, clones the inner object).
newouter = outer.clone();
// Verify that both values were copied.
alert('inner x is '+newouter.inner.x); // prints 4
alert('y is '+newouter.y); // prints 16
史蒂夫
我认为，在没有库的情况下，缓存的重复性是最好的。
被低估的WeakMap涉及到循环的问题，其中存储对新旧对象的引用可以帮助我们很容易地重建整个树。
我阻止了DOM元素的深度克隆，可能您不想克隆整个页面：）
function deepCopy(object) {
const cache = new WeakMap(); // Map of old - new references
function copy(obj) {
if (typeof obj !== 'object' ||
obj === null ||
obj instanceof HTMLElement
)
return obj; // primitive value or HTMLElement
if (obj instanceof Date)
return new Date().setTime(obj.getTime());
if (obj instanceof RegExp)
return new RegExp(obj.source, obj.flags);
if (cache.has(obj))
return cache.get(obj);
const result = obj instanceof Array ? [] : {};
cache.set(obj, result); // store reference to object before the recursive starts
if (obj instanceof Array) {
for(const o of obj) {
result.push(copy(o));
}
return result;
}
const keys = Object.keys(obj);
for (const key of keys)
result[key] = copy(obj[key]);
return result;
}
return copy(object);
}
一些测试：
// #1
const obj1 = { };
const obj2 = { };
obj1.obj2 = obj2;
obj2.obj1 = obj1; // Trivial circular reference
var copy = deepCopy(obj1);
copy == obj1 // false
copy.obj2 === obj1.obj2 // false
copy.obj2.obj1.obj2 // and so on - no error (correctly cloned).
// #2
const obj = { x: 0 }
const clone = deepCopy({ a: obj, b: obj });
clone.a == clone.b // true
// #3
const arr = [];
arr[0] = arr; // A little bit weird but who cares
clone = deepCopy(arr)
clone == arr // false;
clone[0][0][0][0] == clone // true;
注意：我使用常量、for of循环、=>运算符和WeakMaps来创建更重要的代码。当前的浏览器支持此语法（ES6）
如果对象中没有循环依赖关系，我建议使用其他答案之一或jQuery的复制方法，因为它们看起来都很有效。
如果存在循环依赖关系（即，两个子对象彼此链接），那么你就有点糟糕了，因为（从理论角度）没有办法优雅地解决这个问题。
function clone(obj) {
if(obj == null || typeof(obj) != 'object')
return obj;
var temp = new obj.constructor();
for(var key in obj)
temp[key] = clone(obj[key]);
return temp;
}
