我认为有一个简单有效的答案。在深度复制中，有两个问题：

保持财产相互独立。并在克隆的对象上保持方法的有效性。

所以我认为一个简单的解决方案是首先序列化和反序列化，然后对其进行赋值以复制函数。

let deepCloned = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(source));
let merged = Object.assign({}, source);
Object.assign(merged, deepCloned);

虽然这个问题有很多答案，但我希望这个问题也能有所帮助。

这是对A.Levy代码的修改，以处理函数和多个/循环引用的克隆。这意味着，如果克隆的树中的两个财产是同一对象的引用，则克隆的对象树将使这些财产指向被引用对象的同一克隆。这也解决了循环依赖性的问题，如果不加以处理，就会导致无限循环。算法的复杂度为O（n）

function clone(obj){
    var clonedObjectsArray = [];
    var originalObjectsArray = []; //used to remove the unique ids when finished
    var next_objid = 0;

    function objectId(obj) {
        if (obj == null) return null;
        if (obj.__obj_id == undefined){
            obj.__obj_id = next_objid++;
            originalObjectsArray[obj.__obj_id] = obj;
        }
        return obj.__obj_id;
    }

    function cloneRecursive(obj) {
        if (null == obj || typeof obj == "string" || typeof obj == "number" || typeof obj == "boolean") return obj;

        // Handle Date
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            var copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Array
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            var copy = [];
            for (var i = 0; i < obj.length; ++i) {
                copy[i] = cloneRecursive(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Object
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            if (clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] != undefined)
                return clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)];

            var copy;
            if (obj instanceof Function)//Handle Function
                copy = function(){return obj.apply(this, arguments);};
            else
                copy = {};

            clonedObjectsArray[objectId(obj)] = copy;

            for (var attr in obj)
                if (attr != "__obj_id" && obj.hasOwnProperty(attr))
                    copy[attr] = cloneRecursive(obj[attr]);                 

            return copy;
        }       


        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
    }
    var cloneObj = cloneRecursive(obj);



    //remove the unique ids
    for (var i = 0; i < originalObjectsArray.length; i++)
    {
        delete originalObjectsArray[i].__obj_id;
    };

    return cloneObj;
}

一些快速测试

var auxobj = {
    prop1 : "prop1 aux val", 
    prop2 : ["prop2 item1", "prop2 item2"]
    };

var obj = new Object();
obj.prop1 = "prop1_value";
obj.prop2 = [auxobj, auxobj, "some extra val", undefined];
obj.nr = 3465;
obj.bool = true;

obj.f1 = function (){
    this.prop1 = "prop1 val changed by f1";
};

objclone = clone(obj);

//some tests i've made
console.log("test number, boolean and string cloning: " + (objclone.prop1 == obj.prop1 && objclone.nr == obj.nr && objclone.bool == obj.bool));

objclone.f1();
console.log("test function cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop1 == 'prop1 val changed by f1'));
objclone.f1.prop = 'some prop';
console.log("test function cloning 2: " + (obj.f1.prop == undefined));

objclone.prop2[0].prop1 = "prop1 aux val NEW";
console.log("test multiple references cloning 1: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 == objclone.prop2[0].prop1));
console.log("test multiple references cloning 2: " + (objclone.prop2[1].prop1 != obj.prop2[0].prop1));

//
// creates 'clone' method on context object
//
//  var 
//     clon = Object.clone( anyValue );
//
!((function (propertyName, definition) {
    this[propertyName] = definition();
}).call(
    Object,
    "clone",
    function () {
        function isfn(fn) {
            return typeof fn === "function";
        }

        function isobj(o) {
            return o === Object(o);
        }

        function isarray(o) {
            return Object.prototype.toString.call(o) === "[object Array]";
        }

        function fnclon(fn) {
            return function () {
                fn.apply(this, arguments);
            };
        }

        function owns(obj, p) {
            return obj.hasOwnProperty(p);
        }

        function isemptyobj(obj) {
            for (var p in obj) {
                return false;
            }
            return true;
        }

        function isObject(o) {
            return Object.prototype.toString.call(o) === "[object Object]";
        }
        return function (input) {
            if (isfn(input)) {
                return fnclon(input);
            } else if (isobj(input)) {
                var cloned = {};
                for (var p in input) {
                    owns(Object.prototype, p)
                    || (
                        isfn(input[p])
                        && ( cloned[p] = function () { return input[p].apply(input, arguments); } )
                        || ( cloned[p] = input[p] )
                    );
                }
                if (isarray(input)) {
                    cloned.length = input.length;
                    "concat every filter forEach indexOf join lastIndexOf map pop push reduce reduceRight reverse shift slice some sort splice toLocaleString toString unshift"
                    .split(" ")
                    .forEach(
                      function (methodName) {
                        isfn( Array.prototype[methodName] )
                        && (
                            cloned[methodName] =
                            function () {
                                return Array.prototype[methodName].apply(cloned, arguments);
                            }
                        );
                      }
                    );
                }
                return isemptyobj(cloned)
                       ? (
                          isObject(input)
                          ? cloned
                          : input
                        )
                       : cloned;
            } else {
                return input;
            }
        };
    }
));
//

您可以简单地使用扩展属性来复制没有引用的对象。但是要小心（请参见注释），“副本”仅位于最低的对象/数组级别。嵌套的财产仍然是引用！

完整克隆：

let x = {a: 'value1'}
let x2 = {...x}

// => mutate without references:

x2.a = 'value2'
console.log(x.a)    // => 'value1'

在第二级克隆引用：

const y = {a: {b: 'value3'}}
const y2 = {...y}

// => nested object is still a references:

y2.a.b = 'value4'
console.log(y.a.b)    // => 'value4'

JavaScript实际上不支持本地深度克隆。使用效用函数。例如Ramda：

http://ramdajs.com/docs/#clone

本文来自Brian Huisman的《如何在Javascript中复制数组和对象》：

Object.prototype.clone = function() {
  var newObj = (this instanceof Array) ? [] : {};
  for (var i in this) {
    if (i == 'clone') continue;
    if (this[i] && typeof this[i] == "object") {
      newObj[i] = this[i].clone();
    } else newObj[i] = this[i]
  } return newObj;
};

咨询http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/infrastructure.html#safe-为W3C的“安全传递结构化数据”算法传递结构化数据，该算法旨在由浏览器实现，用于将数据传递给例如web工作者。然而，它有一些限制，因为它不处理函数。看见https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/DOM/The_structured_clone_algorithm获取更多信息，包括JS中的另一种算法，它可以帮助您实现这一目标。