我一直以为Java使用pass-by-reference. 但是,我读了一篇博客文章,声称Java使用pass-by-value. 我不认为我明白作者所做的区别。
什么是解释?
我一直以为Java使用pass-by-reference. 但是,我读了一篇博客文章,声称Java使用pass-by-value. 我不认为我明白作者所做的区别。
什么是解释?
当前回答
Java 以参考方式操纵对象,而所有对象变量都是参考。
例如,使用 badSwap() 方法:
public void badSwap(int var1, int
var2{ int temp = var1; var1 = var2; var2 =
temp; }
public void tricky(Point arg1, Point arg2)
{ arg1.x = 100; arg1.y = 100; Point temp = arg1; arg1 = arg2; arg2 = temp; }
public static void main(String [] args) {
Point pnt1 = new Point(0,0); Point pnt2
= new Point(0,0); System.out.println("X:
" + pnt1.x + " Y: " +pnt1.y);
System.out.println("X: " + pnt2.x + " Y:
" +pnt2.y); System.out.println(" ");
tricky(pnt1,pnt2);
System.out.println("X: " + pnt1.x + " Y:" + pnt1.y);
System.out.println("X: " + pnt2.x + " Y: " +pnt2.y); }
如果我们执行这个主要()方法,我们会看到以下输出:
X: 0 Y: 0 X: 0 Y: 0 X: 100 Y: 100 X: 0 Y: 0
该方法成功地改变了 ofpnt1 的值,尽管它通过了值;但是,pnt1 和 pnt2 的交换失败了! 这是混乱的主要来源. 在 themain() 方法中,pnt1 和 pnt2 只是对象参考。 当你 passpnt1 和 pnt2 到 tricky() 方法时,Java 通过了值的参考,就像其他参数一样。
Java 复制并通过参考值,而不是对象. 因此,方法操纵将改变对象,因为参考指向原始对象. 但因为参考是复制,交换将失败. 如图 2 描述,方法参考交换,但不是原始参考。
其他回答
Pass By Reference 收到的函数值是通话者所使用的对象的参考。 通话者所指的对象的任何函数都将被通话者看到,并将从那时起与这些变化进行操作。
正如这些定义所表明的那样,参考通过值是毫无意义的,如果我们要接受这个定义,那么这些术语就变得毫无意义,所有语言都只是通过值。
因此,有了这个理解,我们可以看看Java,并看到它实际上有两种。所有Java原始类型总是通过值,因为你收到一个复印件的呼叫器的对象,并且不能修改他们的复印件。
只需显示对比,请比较以下 C++ 和 Java 剪辑:
在 C++ 中: 注意: 坏代码 - 记忆泄漏! 但它证明了这一点。
void cppMethod(int val, int &ref, Dog obj, Dog &objRef, Dog *objPtr, Dog *&objPtrRef)
{
val = 7; // Modifies the copy
ref = 7; // Modifies the original variable
obj.SetName("obj"); // Modifies the copy of Dog passed
objRef.SetName("objRef"); // Modifies the original Dog passed
objPtr->SetName("objPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to
// by the copy of the pointer passed.
objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr"); // Modifies the copy of the pointer,
// leaving the original object alone.
objPtrRef->SetName("objRefPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to
// by the original pointer passed.
objPtrRef = new Dog("newObjPtrRef"); // Modifies the original pointer passed
}
int main()
{
int a = 0;
int b = 0;
Dog d0 = Dog("d0");
Dog d1 = Dog("d1");
Dog *d2 = new Dog("d2");
Dog *d3 = new Dog("d3");
cppMethod(a, b, d0, d1, d2, d3);
// a is still set to 0
// b is now set to 7
// d0 still have name "d0"
// d1 now has name "objRef"
// d2 now has name "objPtr"
// d3 now has name "newObjPtrRef"
}
在Java,
public static void javaMethod(int val, Dog objPtr)
{
val = 7; // Modifies the copy
objPtr.SetName("objPtr") // Modifies the original Dog pointed to
// by the copy of the pointer passed.
objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr"); // Modifies the copy of the pointer,
// leaving the original object alone.
}
public static void main()
{
int a = 0;
Dog d0 = new Dog("d0");
javaMethod(a, d0);
// a is still set to 0
// d0 now has name "objPtr"
}
Java 只有兩種通過: 根據內置類型的價值,並根據對象類型的指標的價值。
很难理解,但Java总是复制值 - 点是,通常值是参考。
Java 通过常见参考,其中通过了参考的副本,这意味着它基本上是值的过渡。 您可以改变参考的内容,如果类是可变的,但您不能改变参考本身. 换句话说,地址不能改变,因为它通过值,但由地址标记的内容可以改变。
public void foo(Object param)
{
// some code in foo...
}
public void bar()
{
Object obj = new Object();
foo(obj);
}
它是相同的......
public void bar()
{
Object obj = new Object();
Object param = obj;
// some code in foo...
}
不要考虑在这个讨论中不相关的站点。
你会遇到的最常见的运营商之一是简单的任务运营商“="......它将其右上的值归分为其左上的运营商: int cadence = 0; int speed = 0; int gear = 1; 这个运营商也可以用于对象归分对象参考。
很明显,这个运营商如何以两种不同的方式行动:分配值和分配参考;最后,当它是一个对象......第一,当它不是一个对象,即当它是一个原始的。
真相在代码中,让我们尝试一下:
public class AssignmentEvaluation
{
static public class MyInteger
{
public int value = 0;
}
static public void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println("Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width\n");
MyInteger height = new MyInteger();
MyInteger width = new MyInteger();
System.out.println("[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values");
height.value = 9;
width.value = 1;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things! \n");
System.out.println("[2] Assign to height's value the width's value");
height.value = width.value;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");
System.out.println("[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");
height.value = 9;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things yet! \n");
System.out.println("[4] Assign to height the width object");
height = width;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");
System.out.println("[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");
height.value = 9;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are the same thing now! \n");
System.out.println("[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value");
height = new MyInteger();
height.value = 1;
System.out.println("-> height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things again! \n");
}
}
这就是我跑步的结果:
Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width [1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values -> height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things! [2] Assign to height's value the width's value -> height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? [3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value -> height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things yet! [4] Assign to height the width object -> height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? [5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value -> height is 9 and width is 9, we are the same thing now! [6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value -> height is 1 and width is 9, we are different things again!
我们不能那么确定,因为在 [6] 对象是相同的,然后我们将一个新的对象归分给其中一个,然后,对象有不同的价值! 他们现在如何区分,如果他们是相同的? 他们应该在这里也是相同的!!!
此操作员也可以用于对象分配对象参考。