Java 仅通过值,没有通过参考,例如,您可以看到下面的示例。

package com.asok.cop.example.task;
public class Example {
    int data = 50;

    void change(int data) {
        data = data + 100;// changes will be in the local variable 
        System.out.println("after add " + data);
        }

    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Example op = new Example();
        System.out.println("before change " + op.data);
        op.change(500);
        System.out.println("after change " + op.data);
    }
}

出口:

before change 50
after add 600
after change 50

正如迈克尔在评论中所说:

物品仍然通过价值,尽管它们的操作表现像通过参考。 考虑无变 人物(人){人 = 新人(); } 呼叫者对个人对象的参考将保持不变. 物品本身通过价值,但其成员可以受到变化的影响。 为了成为真实的通过参考,我们必须能够重新分配论点到一个

只需显示对比,请比较以下 C++ 和 Java 剪辑:

在 C++ 中: 注意: 坏代码 - 记忆泄漏! 但它证明了这一点。

void cppMethod(int val, int &ref, Dog obj, Dog &objRef, Dog *objPtr, Dog *&objPtrRef)
{
    val = 7; // Modifies the copy
    ref = 7; // Modifies the original variable
    obj.SetName("obj"); // Modifies the copy of Dog passed
    objRef.SetName("objRef"); // Modifies the original Dog passed
    objPtr->SetName("objPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                               // by the copy of the pointer passed.
    objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr");  // Modifies the copy of the pointer, 
                                   // leaving the original object alone.
    objPtrRef->SetName("objRefPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                                    // by the original pointer passed. 
    objPtrRef = new Dog("newObjPtrRef"); // Modifies the original pointer passed
}

int main()
{
    int a = 0;
    int b = 0;
    Dog d0 = Dog("d0");
    Dog d1 = Dog("d1");
    Dog *d2 = new Dog("d2");
    Dog *d3 = new Dog("d3");
    cppMethod(a, b, d0, d1, d2, d3);
    // a is still set to 0
    // b is now set to 7
    // d0 still have name "d0"
    // d1 now has name "objRef"
    // d2 now has name "objPtr"
    // d3 now has name "newObjPtrRef"
}

在Java,

public static void javaMethod(int val, Dog objPtr)
{
   val = 7; // Modifies the copy
   objPtr.SetName("objPtr") // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                            // by the copy of the pointer passed.
   objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr");  // Modifies the copy of the pointer, 
                                  // leaving the original object alone.
}

public static void main()
{
    int a = 0;
    Dog d0 = new Dog("d0");
    javaMethod(a, d0);
    // a is still set to 0
    // d0 now has name "objPtr"
}

Java 只有兩種通過: 根據內置類型的價值,並根據對象類型的指標的價值。

Java 是值之通(stack memory)

它是如何工作的

首先,让我们明白,在哪里Java存储原始数据类型和对象数据类型。原始数据类型本身和对象参考存储在架子里.对象本身存储在架子里.这意味着,架子记忆存储原始数据类型以及对象的地址。

public void foo(Object param)
{
  // some code in foo...
}

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  foo(obj);
}

它是相同的......

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  Object param = obj;

  // some code in foo...
}

不要考虑在这个讨论中不相关的站点。

你会遇到的最常见的运营商之一是简单的任务运营商“="......它将其右上的值归分为其左上的运营商: int cadence = 0; int speed = 0; int gear = 1; 这个运营商也可以用于对象归分对象参考。

很明显,这个运营商如何以两种不同的方式行动:分配值和分配参考;最后,当它是一个对象......第一,当它不是一个对象,即当它是一个原始的。

真相在代码中,让我们尝试一下:

public class AssignmentEvaluation
{
  static public class MyInteger
  {
    public int value = 0;
  }

  static public void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width\n");

    MyInteger height = new MyInteger();
    MyInteger width  = new MyInteger();

    System.out.println("[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values");

    height.value = 9;
    width.value  = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things! \n");

    System.out.println("[2] Assign to height's value the width's value");

    height.value = width.value;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things yet! \n");

    System.out.println("[4] Assign to height the width object");

    height = width;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are the same thing now! \n");

    System.out.println("[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value");

    height = new MyInteger();
    height.value = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things again! \n");
  }
}

这就是我跑步的结果:

Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width

[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things! 

[2] Assign to height's value the width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things yet! 

[4] Assign to height the width object
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 9, we are the same thing now! 

[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 9, we are different things again! 

我们不能那么确定,因为在 [6] 对象是相同的,然后我们将一个新的对象归分给其中一个,然后,对象有不同的价值! 他们现在如何区分,如果他们是相同的? 他们应该在这里也是相同的!!!

此操作员也可以用于对象分配对象参考。

Java 是严格通过价值的

在Java中,当我们做同样的事情时,我们会用手<unk>做同样的事情;因为它们不被称为指标变量(如上所述),即使我们通过参考,我们不能通过参考,因为我们不用指标变量在Java中收集。

我会以另一种方式说:

在 Java 引用中,这些引用是通过的(但不是对象),这些引用是通过的值(引用本身是复制的,你有 2 引用作为结果,你没有控制在方法中的第 1 引用下)。

例如,在Python相同的情况,但有文章,描述他们称之为Pass-by-reference,只有原因引用被使用。