Java 只通过值,这是一个很简单的例子来验证这一点。

public void test() {
    MyClass obj = null;
    init(obj);
    //After calling init method, obj still points to null
    //this is because obj is passed as value and not as reference.
}
private void init(MyClass objVar) {
    objVar = new MyClass();
}

Java 以價值通過一切!!!

创建一个对象,通过一个名字和年龄:

PersonClass variable1 = new PersonClass("Mary", 32);

PersonClass variable2;

// 变量2 和变量1 现在提到相同的对象

variable2 = variable1; 


PersonClass variable3 = new PersonClass("Andre", 45);

// variable1 现在指向 variable3

variable1 = variable3;

什么是由此产生的?

System.out.println(variable2);
System.out.println(variable1);

Mary 32
Andre 45

如果你能理解这个例子,我们做了,否则,请访问这个网页详细解释:

网页

Java 总是使用 Call by Value. 这意味着该方法获得所有参数值的副本。

考虑下列三种情况:

1、试图改变原始变量

public static void increment(int x) { x++; }

int a = 3;
increment(a);

x 将复制一个值,并将增加 x,一个将保持相同的值

(二)试图改变对象的原始领域

public static void increment(Person p) { p.age++; }

Person pers = new Person(20); // age = 20
increment(pers);

p 将复制个体的参考值,并将增加年龄领域,变量是指相同的对象,所以年龄改变。

(三)试图改变参考变量的参考值

public static void swap(Person p1, Person p2) {
    Person temp = p1;
    p1 = p2;
    p2 = temp;
}

Person pers1 = new Person(10);
Person pers2 = new Person(20);
swap(pers1, pers2);

呼叫交换 p1 后,p2 复制 pers1 和 pers2 的参考值与值交换,因此 pers1 和 pers2 仍然相同。

因此,您只能在将参考值复制到该对象时更改对象的字段。

“pass-by-value”和“pass-by-reference”是指变量;“pass-by-value”是指变量的值转移到函数/方法;“pass-by-reference”是指该变量的参考转移到函数;“pass-by-reference”是指变量的值转移到函数;“pass-by-reference”是指变量的值转移到函数。

它如同这样:

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Dog aDog = new Dog("Max");
    Dog oldDog = aDog;

    // we pass the object to foo
    foo(aDog);
    // aDog variable is still pointing to the "Max" dog when foo(...) returns
    aDog.getName().equals("Max"); // true
    aDog.getName().equals("Fifi"); // false
    aDog == oldDog; // true
}

public static void foo(Dog d) {
    d.getName().equals("Max"); // true
    // change d inside of foo() to point to a new Dog instance "Fifi"
    d = new Dog("Fifi");
    d.getName().equals("Fifi"); // true
}

同样:

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Dog aDog = new Dog("Max");
    Dog oldDog = aDog;

    foo(aDog);
    // when foo(...) returns, the name of the dog has been changed to "Fifi"
    aDog.getName().equals("Fifi"); // true
    // but it is still the same dog:
    aDog == oldDog; // true
}

public static void foo(Dog d) {
    d.getName().equals("Max"); // true
    // this changes the name of d to be "Fifi"
    d.setName("Fifi");
}

有关参考通行和值通行的更多信息,请参见以下答案: https://stackoverflow.com/a/430958/6005228. 这更详细地解释了两者背后的语法和历史,并解释了为什么Java和许多其他现代语言似乎在某些情况下都会做两件事。

public void foo(Object param)
{
  // some code in foo...
}

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  foo(obj);
}

它是相同的......

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  Object param = obj;

  // some code in foo...
}

不要考虑在这个讨论中不相关的站点。

你会遇到的最常见的运营商之一是简单的任务运营商“="......它将其右上的值归分为其左上的运营商: int cadence = 0; int speed = 0; int gear = 1; 这个运营商也可以用于对象归分对象参考。

很明显,这个运营商如何以两种不同的方式行动:分配值和分配参考;最后,当它是一个对象......第一,当它不是一个对象,即当它是一个原始的。

真相在代码中,让我们尝试一下:

public class AssignmentEvaluation
{
  static public class MyInteger
  {
    public int value = 0;
  }

  static public void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width\n");

    MyInteger height = new MyInteger();
    MyInteger width  = new MyInteger();

    System.out.println("[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values");

    height.value = 9;
    width.value  = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things! \n");

    System.out.println("[2] Assign to height's value the width's value");

    height.value = width.value;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things yet! \n");

    System.out.println("[4] Assign to height the width object");

    height = width;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are the same thing now! \n");

    System.out.println("[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value");

    height = new MyInteger();
    height.value = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things again! \n");
  }
}

这就是我跑步的结果:

Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width

[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things! 

[2] Assign to height's value the width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things yet! 

[4] Assign to height the width object
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 9, we are the same thing now! 

[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 9, we are different things again! 

我们不能那么确定,因为在 [6] 对象是相同的,然后我们将一个新的对象归分给其中一个,然后,对象有不同的价值! 他们现在如何区分,如果他们是相同的? 他们应该在这里也是相同的!!!

此操作员也可以用于对象分配对象参考。

区别,或可能只是我记得我曾经像原始海报一样的印象是这样的:Java总是通过价值,Java中的所有对象(除了原始对象)都是参考。