我使用useEffect钩子来克服做这些事情的头痛，所以现在我传递一个变量给child，像这样:

import { useEffect, useState } from "react"; export const ParentComponent = () => { const [trigger, setTrigger] = useState(false); return ( <div onClick={() => { setTrigger(trigger => !trigger); }}> <ChildComponent trigger={trigger}></ChildComponent> </div> ); }; export const ChildComponent = (props) => { const triggerInvokedFromParent = () => { console.log('TriggerInvokedFromParent'); }; useEffect(() => { triggerInvokedFromParent(); }, [props.trigger]); return <span>ChildComponent</span>; };

首先，让我声明一下，在React领域，这通常不是做事的方式。通常，您要做的是将功能传递给道具中的子元素，并在事件中传递子元素的通知(或者更好的方法是:分派)。

但如果必须在子组件上公开命令式方法，则可以使用refs。记住，这是一个逃生口，通常表明有更好的设计可用。

以前，引用只支持基于类的组件。 随着React Hooks的出现，这种情况不再存在

Modern React with Hooks (v16.8+)

const { forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle } = React; // We need to wrap component in `forwardRef` in order to gain // access to the ref object that is assigned using the `ref` prop. // This ref is passed as the second parameter to the function component. const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => { // The component instance will be extended // with whatever you return from the callback passed // as the second argument useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({ getAlert() { alert("getAlert from Child"); } })); return <h1>Hi</h1>; }); const Parent = () => { // In order to gain access to the child component instance, // you need to assign it to a `ref`, so we call `useRef()` to get one const childRef = useRef(); return ( <div> <Child ref={childRef} /> <button onClick={() => childRef.current.getAlert()}>Click</button> </div> ); }; ReactDOM.render( <Parent />, document.getElementById('root') ); <script src="https://unpkg.com/react@16/umd/react.development.js" crossorigin></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@16/umd/react-dom.development.js" crossorigin></script> <div id="root"></div>

useImperativeHandle()的文档在这里:

useImperativeHandle自定义使用ref时暴露给父组件的实例值。

使用类组件的遗留API (>= react@16.4)

const { Component } = React; class Parent extends Component { constructor(props) { super(props); this.child = React.createRef(); } onClick = () => { this.child.current.getAlert(); }; render() { return ( <div> <Child ref={this.child} /> <button onClick={this.onClick}>Click</button> </div> ); } } class Child extends Component { getAlert() { alert('getAlert from Child'); } render() { return <h1>Hello</h1>; } } ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById('root')); <script src="https://unpkg.com/react@16/umd/react.development.js" crossorigin></script> <script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@16/umd/react-dom.development.js" crossorigin></script> <div id="root"></div>

回调参考API

回调风格的引用是实现这一点的另一种方法，尽管在现代React中不太常见:

const { Component } = React; const { render } = ReactDOM; class Parent extends Component { render() { return ( <div> <Child ref={instance => { this.child = instance; }} /> <button onClick={() => { this.child.getAlert(); }}>Click</button> </div> ); } } class Child extends Component { getAlert() { alert('clicked'); } render() { return ( <h1>Hello</h1> ); } } render( <Parent />, document.getElementById('app') ); <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script> <div id="app"></div>

https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/expose-component-functions.html 更多答案请参考这里调用React子组件上的方法

通过查看“reason”组件的引用，您正在破坏封装，如果不仔细检查使用该组件的所有位置，就不可能重构该组件。正因为如此，我们强烈建议将引用视为组件的私有，就像状态一样。

一般来说，数据应该通过道具沿着树向下传递。有一些例外情况(比如调用.focus()或触发一个不会真正“改变”状态的一次性动画)，但任何时候你要公开一个名为“set”的方法，道具通常是更好的选择。试着让内部输入组件担心它的大小和外观，这样它的祖先就不会担心。

这里是我的演示:https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-dgz1ee?file=styles.css

I am using useEffect to call the children component's methods. I have tried with Proxy and Setter_Getter but sor far useEffect seems to be the more convenient way to call a child method from parent. To use Proxy and Setter_Getter it seems there is some subtlety to overcome first, because the element firstly rendered is an objectLike's element through the ref.current return => <div/>'s specificity. Concerning useEffect, you can also leverage on this approach to set the parent's state depending on what you want to do with the children.

在我提供的演示链接中，你会发现我完整的ReactJS代码和我的草稿，所以你可以欣赏我的解决方案的工作流程。

在这里，我只提供了相关代码的ReactJS片段。：

import React, {
  Component,
  createRef,
  forwardRef,
  useState,
  useEffect
} from "react"; 

{...}

// Child component
// I am defining here a forwardRef's element to get the Child's methods from the parent
// through the ref's element.
let Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
  // I am fetching the parent's method here
  // that allows me to connect the parent and the child's components
  let { validateChildren } = props;
  // I am initializing the state of the children
  // good if we can even leverage on the functional children's state
  let initialState = {
    one: "hello world",
    two: () => {
      console.log("I am accessing child method from parent :].");
      return "child method achieve";
    }
  };
  // useState initialization
  const [componentState, setComponentState] = useState(initialState);
  // useEffect will allow me to communicate with the parent
  // through a lifecycle data flow
  useEffect(() => {
    ref.current = { componentState };
    validateChildren(ref.current.componentState.two);
  });

{...}

});

{...}

// Parent component
class App extends Component {
  // initialize the ref inside the constructor element
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.childRef = createRef();
  }

  // I am implementing a parent's method
  // in child useEffect's method
  validateChildren = childrenMethod => {
    // access children method from parent
    childrenMethod();
    // or signaling children is ready
    console.log("children active");
  };

{...}
render(){
       return (
          {
            // I am referencing the children
            // also I am implementing the parent logic connector's function
            // in the child, here => this.validateChildren's function
          }
          <Child ref={this.childRef} validateChildren={this.validateChildren} />
        </div>
       )
}

你可以很容易地使用你的子组件作为react自定义钩子来应用这个逻辑。

如何实施?

子函数返回一个函数。 子函数返回JSON:{函数、HTML或其他值}作为示例。

在这个例子中，应用这个逻辑没有意义，但很容易看出:

const {useState} = React; //Parent const Parent = () => { //custome hook const child = useChild(); return ( <div> {child.display} <button onClick={child.alert}> Parent call child </button> {child.btn} </div> ); }; //Child const useChild = () => { const [clickCount, setClick] = React.useState(0); {/* child button*/} const btn = ( <button onClick={() => { setClick(clickCount + 1); }} > Click me </button> ); return { btn: btn, //function called from parent alert: () => { alert("You clicked " + clickCount + " times"); }, display: <h1>{clickCount}</h1> }; }; const rootElement = document.getElementById("root"); ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, rootElement); <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script> <div id="root"></div>

你可以在这里使用另一个模式:

class Parent extends Component {
 render() {
  return (
    <div>
      <Child setClick={click => this.clickChild = click}/>
      <button onClick={() => this.clickChild()}>Click</button>
    </div>
  );
 }
}

class Child extends Component {
 constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.getAlert = this.getAlert.bind(this);
 }
 componentDidMount() {
    this.props.setClick(this.getAlert);
 }
 getAlert() {
    alert('clicked');
 }
 render() {
  return (
    <h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
  );
 }
}

它所做的是在挂载子节点时设置父节点的clickChild方法。这样，当你点击parent中的按钮时，它会调用clickChild，它会调用child的getAlert。

如果你的子文件是用connect()包装的，那么你就不需要getWrappedInstance()了。

注意你不能使用onClick={this。在父元素中使用clickChild}，因为当父元素被渲染时，子元素不会被挂载，所以这个。clickChild还没有被分配。使用onClick={() => this. clickchild()}是好的，因为当你点击按钮this. clickchild()}。clickChild应该已经被分配了。