使用useEffect的替代方法:

家长:

const [refresh, doRefresh] = useState(0);
<Button onClick={() => doRefresh(prev => prev + 1)} />
<Children refresh={refresh} />

孩子们:

useEffect(() => {
    performRefresh(); //children function of interest
  }, [props.refresh]);

逻辑很简单。

在父类中使用child或ref创建一个函数。

我更喜欢父用子的创建功能。有很多种方法。

使用功能组件时

在父

function Parent(){
  const [functionToCall, createFunctionToCall] = useState(()=>()=>{})

  return (
   <Child createFunctionToCall={createFunctionToCall} />
  )
}

在儿童

function Child({createFunctionToCall}){
  useEffect(()=>{
    function theFunctionToCall(){
      // do something like setting something
      // don't forget to set dependancies properly.
    }
    createFunctionToCall(()=>theFunctionToCall)
  },[createFunctionToCall])
}

用这种方法可以很容易地实现这一点

步骤,

Create a boolean variable in the state in the parent class. Update this when you want to call a function. Create a prop variable and assign the boolean variable. From the child component access that variable using props and execute the method you want by having an if condition. class Child extends Component { Method=()=>{ --Your method body-- } render() { return ( //check whether the variable has been updated or not if(this.props.updateMethod){ this.Method(); } ) } } class Parent extends Component { constructor(){ this.state={ callMethod:false } } render() { return ( //update state according to your requirement this.setState({ callMethod:true }} <Child updateMethod={this.state.callMethod}></Child> ); } }

我希望我没有重复上面的内容但是如果传递一个回调道具来设置父类中的函数呢?这很有效，也很简单。(添加的代码在////之间)

class Parent extends Component {
  ///// 
  getAlert = () => {} // initial value for getAlert

  setGetAlertMethod = (newMethod) => {
    this.getAlert = newMethod;
  }
  /////

  render() {
    return (
      <Child setGetAlertMethod={this.setGetAlertMethod}>
        <button onClick={this.getAlert}>Click</button>
      </Child>
      );
    }
  }



class Child extends Component {
  /////
  componentDidMount() {
    this.props.setGetAlertMethod(this.getAlert);
  }
  /////

  getAlert() => {
    alert('clicked');
  }

  render() {
    return (
      <h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
    );
  }
}

我尝试使用createRef或useRef。它们都返回null。

其次，这个答案提出通过一个道具来设置一个在我看来最合理的函数。但如果子组件用于多个地方，则应该将额外的道具添加到其他地方。此外，如果您想在孙辈中调用一个方法，这个方法可能太啰嗦或太冗长。

所以我用一种非常原始的方式创建了我自己的函数存储。

下面是functionStore.js文件

const fns = {};

export function setFn(componentName, fnName, fn) {
  if (fns[componentName]) {
    fns[componentName][fnName] = fn;
  } else {
    fns[componentName] = { fnName: fn };
  }
}

export function callFn(componentName, fnName) {
  fns[componentName][fnName]();
}

我只是设置了需要从任何组件调用的函数。

import { setFn } from "./functionStore";
export class AComponent extends React.Component {
  componentDidMount() {
    setFn("AComponent", "aFunc", this.aFunc);
  }
  aFunc = () => { console.log("aFunc is called!"); };
}

然后我从其他组件调用它

import { callFn } from "./functionStore";
export class BComponent extends React.Component {
  
  // just call the function
  bFunc = () => { 
    callFn("AComponent", "aFunc");
  };
}

一个缺点是要调用的函数应该是无参数的。但这也可能以某种方式解决。目前，我不需要传递参数。

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      someParentFunction: someParentFunction
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。

对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.child.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      parent: {
          someParentFunction: someParentFunction
      }
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef {
       child: {
            someChildFunction: someChildFunction
       }
   }

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。

One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.