您可以使用ref从父组件调用子组件的函数

功能组件解决方案

在函数组件中，你必须使用useImperativeHandle来获取引用到如下所示的子组件中

import React, { forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle } from 'react';
export default function ParentFunction() {
    const childRef = useRef();
    return (
        <div className="container">
            <div>
                Parent Component
            </div>
            <button
                onClick={() => { childRef.current.showAlert() }}
            >
            Call Function
            </button>
            <Child ref={childRef}/>
        </div>
    )
}
const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
    useImperativeHandle(
        ref,
        () => ({
            showAlert() {
                alert("Child Function Called")
            }
        }),
    )
    return (
       <div>Child Component</div>
    )
})

类组件解决方案

Child.js

import s from './Child.css';

class Child extends Component {
 getAlert() {
    alert('clicked');
 }
 render() {
  return (
    <h1>Hello</h1>
  );
 }
}

export default Child;

Parent.js

class Parent extends Component {
 render() {
  onClick() {
    this.refs.child.getAlert();
  }
  return (
    <div>
      <Child ref="child" />
      <button onClick={this.onClick}>Click</button>
    </div>
  );
 }
}

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      someParentFunction: someParentFunction
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。

对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.child.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      parent: {
          someParentFunction: someParentFunction
      }
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef {
       child: {
            someChildFunction: someChildFunction
       }
   }

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。

One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.

用这种方法可以很容易地实现这一点

步骤,

Create a boolean variable in the state in the parent class. Update this when you want to call a function. Create a prop variable and assign the boolean variable. From the child component access that variable using props and execute the method you want by having an if condition. class Child extends Component { Method=()=>{ --Your method body-- } render() { return ( //check whether the variable has been updated or not if(this.props.updateMethod){ this.Method(); } ) } } class Parent extends Component { constructor(){ this.state={ callMethod:false } } render() { return ( //update state according to your requirement this.setState({ callMethod:true }} <Child updateMethod={this.state.callMethod}></Child> ); } }

这里是我的演示:https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-dgz1ee?file=styles.css

I am using useEffect to call the children component's methods. I have tried with Proxy and Setter_Getter but sor far useEffect seems to be the more convenient way to call a child method from parent. To use Proxy and Setter_Getter it seems there is some subtlety to overcome first, because the element firstly rendered is an objectLike's element through the ref.current return => <div/>'s specificity. Concerning useEffect, you can also leverage on this approach to set the parent's state depending on what you want to do with the children.

在我提供的演示链接中，你会发现我完整的ReactJS代码和我的草稿，所以你可以欣赏我的解决方案的工作流程。

在这里，我只提供了相关代码的ReactJS片段。：

import React, {
  Component,
  createRef,
  forwardRef,
  useState,
  useEffect
} from "react"; 

{...}

// Child component
// I am defining here a forwardRef's element to get the Child's methods from the parent
// through the ref's element.
let Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
  // I am fetching the parent's method here
  // that allows me to connect the parent and the child's components
  let { validateChildren } = props;
  // I am initializing the state of the children
  // good if we can even leverage on the functional children's state
  let initialState = {
    one: "hello world",
    two: () => {
      console.log("I am accessing child method from parent :].");
      return "child method achieve";
    }
  };
  // useState initialization
  const [componentState, setComponentState] = useState(initialState);
  // useEffect will allow me to communicate with the parent
  // through a lifecycle data flow
  useEffect(() => {
    ref.current = { componentState };
    validateChildren(ref.current.componentState.two);
  });

{...}

});

{...}

// Parent component
class App extends Component {
  // initialize the ref inside the constructor element
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.childRef = createRef();
  }

  // I am implementing a parent's method
  // in child useEffect's method
  validateChildren = childrenMethod => {
    // access children method from parent
    childrenMethod();
    // or signaling children is ready
    console.log("children active");
  };

{...}
render(){
       return (
          {
            // I am referencing the children
            // also I am implementing the parent logic connector's function
            // in the child, here => this.validateChildren's function
          }
          <Child ref={this.childRef} validateChildren={this.validateChildren} />
        </div>
       )
}

我们很高兴有一个自定义钩子，我们称之为useCounterKey。它只是设置了一个反键，或者一个从0开始计数的键。它返回的函数将重置键(即增量)。(我相信这是React中最常用的重置组件的方法-只需撞击键。)

然而，这个钩子也适用于任何情况下，你想发送一个一次性的消息给客户端做某事。例如，我们用它来聚焦子控件中的某个父事件——它只是在键更新时自动聚焦。(如果需要更多道具，它们可以在重置按键之前设置，以便在事件发生时可用。)

这个方法有一点学习曲线b/c，它不像典型的事件处理程序那么直接，但它似乎是我们在React中发现的最习惯的处理方法(因为键已经以这种方式起作用)。Def开放对这种方法的反馈，但它是工作得很好!

// Main helper hook:
export function useCounterKey() {
  const [key, setKey] = useState(0);
  return [key, () => setKey(prev => prev + 1)] as const;
}

示例用法:

// Sample 1 - normal React, just reset a control by changing Key on demand
function Sample1() {
  const [inputLineCounterKey, resetInputLine] = useCounterKey();

  return <>
    <InputLine key={inputLineCounterKey} />
    <button onClick={() => resetInputLine()} />
  <>;
}

// Second sample - anytime the counterKey is incremented, child calls focus() on the input
function Sample2() {
  const [amountFocusCounterKey, focusAmountInput] = useCounterKey();

  // ... call focusAmountInput in some hook or event handler as needed

  return <WorkoutAmountInput focusCounterKey={amountFocusCounterKey} />
}

function WorkoutAmountInput(props) {
  useEffect(() => {
    if (counterKey > 0) {
      // Don't focus initially
      focusAmount();
    }
  }, [counterKey]);

  // ...
}

(counterKey的概念要归功于Kent Dodds。)

这里有个虫子?注意: 我同意rossipedia的解决方案使用forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle

网上有一些错误的信息说refs只能从React类组件创建，但如果你使用上面提到的钩子，你确实可以使用函数组件。注意，只有在我将文件更改为在导出组件时不使用withRouter()后，钩子才对我有效。例如，从

export default withRouter(TableConfig);

取而代之的是

export default TableConfig;

In hindsight the withRouter() is not needed for such a component anyway, but usually it doesn't hurt anything having it in. My use case is that I created a component to create a Table to handle the viewing and editing of config values, and I wanted to be able to tell this Child component to reset it's state values whenever the Parent form's Reset button was hit. UseRef() wouldn't properly get the ref or ref.current (kept on getting null) until I removed withRouter() from the file containing my child component TableConfig