enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
我使用计算属性,它返回所有值的数组(感谢这篇文章http://natecook.com/blog/2014/10/loopy-random-enum-ideas/)。但是,它也使用int原始值,但我不需要在单独的属性中重复枚举的所有成员。
Xcode 6.1在如何使用rawValue获取enum成员方面做了一点改变,所以我修正了listing。还修复了第一个rawValue错误的小错误。
enum ValidSuits: Int {
case Clubs = 0, Spades, Hearts, Diamonds
func description() -> String {
switch self {
case .Clubs:
return "♣︎"
case .Spades:
return "♠︎"
case .Diamonds:
return "♦︎"
case .Hearts:
return "♥︎"
}
}
static var allSuits: [ValidSuits] {
return Array(
SequenceOf {
() -> GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> in
var i=0
return GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> {
return ValidSuits(rawValue: i++)
}
}
)
}
}
其他回答
您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。
ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。
enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
// ... other functions
// Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
func successor() -> Rank {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
// ... etc.
default:
return .King
}
}
// Option 2 - Define an operator!
func successor() -> Rank {
return self + 1
}
}
// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
// I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
// or whatever else you can think of
return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}
在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数,允许你这样写:
// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
// Do something useful
}
枚举有toRaw()和fromRaw()方法。所以如果你的原始值是Int,你可以从第一个枚举迭代到最后一个枚举:
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades:
return "spades"
case .Hearts:
return "hearts"
case .Diamonds:
return "diamonds"
case .Clubs:
return "clubs"
}
}
}
for i in Suit.Spades.toRaw()...Suit.Clubs.toRaw() {
if let covertedSuit = Suit.fromRaw(i) {
let description = covertedSuit.simpleDescription()
}
}
一个问题是在运行simpleDescription方法之前需要测试可选值,因此我们首先将convertedSuit设置为我们的值,然后将常量设置为convertedSuit.simpleDescription()
我在比特和字节中跌跌撞撞,创建了一个扩展,后来我发现它与@rintaro的答案非常相似。它是这样使用的:
enum E : EnumCollection {
case A, B, C
}
Array(E.cases()) // [A, B, C]
值得注意的是,它可以在任何没有关联值的enum上使用。注意,这对于没有大小写的枚举不起作用。
与@rintaro的答案一样,这段代码使用枚举的底层表示。这种表示没有文档化,将来可能会改变,这会破坏它。我不建议在生产中使用这种方法。
代码(Swift 2.2, Xcode 7.3.1,不工作在Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyGenerator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
代码(Swift 3, Xcode 8.1,不工作在Xcode 10):
protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
typealias S = Self
return AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
var raw = 0
return AnyIterator {
let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) { $0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee } }
guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
raw += 1
return current
}
}
}
}
我不知道为什么我需要typealias,但编译器抱怨没有它。
enum Rank: Int {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Ace: return "ace"
case .Jack: return "jack"
case .Queen: return "queen"
case .King: return "king"
default: return String(self.toRaw())
}
}
}
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 1
case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
func simpleDescription() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades: return "spades"
case .Hearts: return "hearts"
case .Diamonds: return "diamonds"
case .Clubs: return "clubs"
}
}
func color() -> String {
switch self {
case .Spades, .Clubs: return "black"
case .Hearts, .Diamonds: return "red"
}
}
}
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
static func createPokers() -> Card[] {
let ranks = Array(Rank.Ace.toRaw()...Rank.King.toRaw())
let suits = Array(Suit.Spades.toRaw()...Suit.Clubs.toRaw())
let cards = suits.reduce(Card[]()) { (tempCards, suit) in
tempCards + ranks.map { rank in
Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(rank)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(suit)!)
}
}
return cards
}
}
我的解决方案是声明一个包含所有枚举可能性的数组。所以for循环可以遍历所有这些。
//Function inside struct Card
static func generateFullDeck() -> [Card] {
let allRanks = [Rank.Ace, Rank.Two, Rank.Three, Rank.Four, Rank.Five, Rank.Six, Rank.Seven, Rank.Eight, Rank.Nine, Rank.Ten, Rank.Jack, Rank.Queen, Rank.King]
let allSuits = [Suit.Hearts, Suit.Diamonds, Suit.Clubs, Suit.Spades]
var myFullDeck: [Card] = []
for myRank in allRanks {
for mySuit in allSuits {
myFullDeck.append(Card(rank: myRank, suit: mySuit))
}
}
return myFullDeck
}
//actual use:
let aFullDeck = Card.generateFullDeck() //Generate the desired full deck
var allDesc: [String] = []
for aCard in aFullDeck {
println(aCard.simpleDescription()) //You'll see all the results in playground
}