enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
enum Suit: String {
case spades = "♠"
case hearts = "♥"
case diamonds = "♦"
case clubs = "♣"
}
例如,我怎么做这样的事情:
for suit in Suit {
// do something with suit
print(suit.rawValue)
}
结果示例:
♠
♥
♦
♣
当前回答
您可以通过实现ForwardIndexType协议来迭代枚举。
ForwardIndexType协议要求您定义一个继任者()函数来逐级遍历元素。
enum Rank: Int, ForwardIndexType {
case Ace = 1
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King
// ... other functions
// Option 1 - Figure it out by hand
func successor() -> Rank {
switch self {
case .Ace:
return .Two
case .Two:
return .Three
// ... etc.
default:
return .King
}
}
// Option 2 - Define an operator!
func successor() -> Rank {
return self + 1
}
}
// NOTE: The operator is defined OUTSIDE the class
func + (left: Rank, right: Int) -> Rank {
// I'm using to/from raw here, but again, you can use a case statement
// or whatever else you can think of
return left == .King ? .King : Rank(rawValue: left.rawValue + right)!
}
在开或闭范围内迭代(..<或…)将在内部调用继任者()函数,允许你这样写:
// Under the covers, successor(Rank.King) and successor(Rank.Ace) are called to establish limits
for r in Rank.Ace...Rank.King {
// Do something useful
}
其他回答
你可以试着像这样列举
enum Planet: String {
case Mercury
case Venus
case Earth
case Mars
static var enumerate: [Planet] {
var a: [Planet] = []
switch Planet.Mercury {
case .Mercury: a.append(.Mercury); fallthrough
case .Venus: a.append(.Venus); fallthrough
case .Earth: a.append(.Earth); fallthrough
case .Mars: a.append(.Mars)
}
return a
}
}
Planet.enumerate // [Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars]
有一种聪明的方法,尽管令人沮丧,但它说明了两种不同类型的枚举之间的区别。
试试这个:
func makeDeck() -> Card[] {
var deck: Card[] = []
var suits: Suit[] = [.Hearts, .Diamonds, .Clubs, .Spades]
for i in 1...13 {
for suit in suits {
deck += Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: suit)
}
}
return deck
}
交易是,一个由数字(原始值)支持的枚举是隐式显式有序的,而一个没有数字支持的枚举是显式隐式无序的。
例如,当我们给枚举值数字时,语言足够狡猾,可以找出数字的顺序。 另一方面,如果我们不给它任何顺序,当我们尝试迭代这些值时,语言就会举起双手说:“是的,但你想先执行哪个??”
其他可以做到这一点(迭代无序枚举)的语言可能是相同的语言,其中所有内容实际上都是一个地图或字典,你可以迭代地图的键,无论是否有任何逻辑顺序。
诀窍是给它提供一些显式排序的东西,在这个例子中,suit的实例在数组中按照我们想要的顺序。一旦你这么说,霉霉就会说“你为什么不一开始就这么说呢?”
另一个简写技巧是在fromRaw函数上使用强制操作符。这说明了关于枚举的另一个“陷阱”,即可能传入的值的范围通常大于枚举的范围。例如,如果我们说Rank.fromRaw(60),就不会返回值,所以我们使用了语言的可选特性,在我们开始使用可选特性的地方,很快就会出现强制。(或者交替if let结构,这对我来说仍然有点奇怪)
这看起来像一个黑客,但如果你使用原始值,你可以这样做
enum Suit: Int {
case Spades = 0, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
...
}
var suitIndex = 0
while var suit = Suit.fromRaw(suitIndex++) {
...
}
这个问题现在简单多了。以下是我的Swift 4.2解决方案:
enum Suit: Int, CaseIterable {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allNonNullCases = Suit.allCases[Spade.rawValue...]
}
enum Rank: Int, CaseIterable {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight
case Nine, Ten, Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allNonNullCases = Rank.allCases[Two.rawValue...]
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allNonNullCases {
for rank in Rank.allNonNullCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
4。2:
我喜欢这个解决方案,我把找到“列表理解在Swift”。
它使用Int rawws而不是string,但它避免了键入两次,它允许自定义范围,并且不硬编码原始值。
这是我最初解决方案的Swift 4版本,但请参阅上面的4.2改进:
enum Suit: Int {
case None
case Spade, Heart, Diamond, Club
static let allRawValues = Suit.Spade.rawValue...Suit.Club.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Suit(rawValue: $0)! })
}
enum Rank: Int {
case Joker
case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six
case Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
case Jack, Queen, King, Ace
static let allRawValues = Rank.Two.rawValue...Rank.Ace.rawValue
static let allCases = Array(allRawValues.map{ Rank(rawValue: $0)! })
}
func makeDeck(withJoker: Bool = false) -> [Card] {
var deck = [Card]()
for suit in Suit.allCases {
for rank in Rank.allCases {
deck.append(Card(suit: suit, rank: rank))
}
}
if withJoker {
deck.append(Card(suit: .None, rank: .Joker))
}
return deck
}
实验内容是: 实验
在Card中添加一个方法,用于创建一副完整的牌,每一副牌都是rank和花色的组合。
因此,除了添加方法之外,没有修改或增强给定的代码(并且没有使用还没有教过的东西),我想出了这个解决方案:
struct Card {
var rank: Rank
var suit: Suit
func simpleDescription() -> String {
return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
}
func createDeck() -> [Card] {
var deck: [Card] = []
for rank in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
for suit in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
let card = Card(rank: Rank(rawValue: rank)!, suit: Suit(rawValue: suit)!)
//println(card.simpleDescription())
deck += [card]
}
}
return deck
}
}
let threeOfSpades = Card(rank: .Three, suit: .Spades)
let threeOfSpadesDescription = threeOfSpades.simpleDescription()
let deck = threeOfSpades.createDeck()