我读得越多，就越困惑。所以，我的理解是:

封装:

我们通常从外面看到手表，它的组件被封装在它的身体里。我们对不同的操作有某种控制。这种隐藏细节和公开控制(例如设置时间)的方式就是封装。

抽象:

到目前为止，我们一直在谈论手表。但我们没有具体说明是哪种手表。可以是数字的，也可以是模拟的，可以是手用的，也可以是墙用的。有很多可能性。我们所知道的是，这是一块手表，它显示时间，这是我们唯一感兴趣的东西，时间。这种隐藏细节和公开通用特性或用例的方法就是抽象。

class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
  // Aeroplane is a flying object
  // Aeroplane can be fueled
  // Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered 
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code 
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of 
// flying object they are.

// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();

// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far 
// as it can Fill Fuel**

两者之间存在差异

ABSTRAACTION

and

封装

1.    First difference between Abstraction and Encapsulation is that, Abstraction is implemented in Java using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private, package-private and protected access modifier.

2.    Data abstraction simply means generalizing something to hide the complex logic that goes underneath where Encapsulation is DATA HIDING.


3.    Encapsulation is combining related logic data (variables and methods) where as Abstraction is hiding internal implementation details and expose only relevant details to the user. In a way you can Abstraction is achieved by Encapsulation.

从这个

OOPS中封装和抽象的区别

抽象和封装是两个重要的面向对象编程(oop)概念。封装和抽象都是相互关联的术语。

封装和抽象的现实区别

封装意味着隐藏。封装也称为数据隐藏。你可以把胶囊想象成胶囊(药片)，里面藏着药。封装是包装，只是隐藏属性和方法。封装用于将代码和数据隐藏在单个单元中，以保护数据不受外界的影响。类是封装的最佳示例。

抽象指的是只向预期的用户显示必要的细节。顾名思义，抽象是“任何事物的抽象形式”。我们在编程语言中使用抽象来创建抽象类。抽象类表示类的方法和属性的抽象视图。

封装和抽象之间的实现差异

Abstraction is implemented using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private and protected access modifier. OOPS makes use of encapsulation to enforce the integrity of a type (i.e. to make sure data is used in an appropriate manner) by preventing programmers from accessing data in a non-intended manner. Through encapsulation, only a predetermined group of functions can access the data. The collective term for datatypes and operations (methods) bundled together with access restrictions (public/private, etc.) is a class.

抽象:以一种简化的/不同的方式来呈现事物的想法，这种方式要么更容易理解和使用，要么更切合实际。

考虑一个发送电子邮件的类……它使用抽象来向你展示自己作为某种信使，所以你可以调用emailSender。发送(邮件,收件人)。它的实际功能——选择POP3 / SMTP、调用服务器、MIME转换等等，都被抽象了出来。你只看到你的信使。

封装:保护和隐藏对象私有的数据和方法的思想。它更多的是让某样东西独立且万无一失。

以我为例。我把我的心率从世界其他地方压缩起来。因为我不希望其他人改变这个变量，我也不需要其他人来设置它来让我运行。它对我来说至关重要，但你不需要知道它是什么，而且你可能根本不在乎。

环顾四周，您会发现几乎所有您接触到的东西都是抽象和封装的例子。例如，你的手机向你展示了一种抽象的功能，它能把你说的话传达给别人——掩盖了GSM、处理器架构、无线电频率以及其他无数你不理解或不关心的东西。它还封装了来自您的某些数据，如序列号、ID号、频率等。

这一切都使世界成为一个更美好的居住地

抽象或封装并不严格要求信息隐藏。信息可能会被忽略，但不一定要隐藏。

封装是一种将事物视为单一事物的能力，即使它可能由许多复杂的部分或思想组成。例如，我可以说我坐在一把“椅子”上，而不是指这把椅子上的许多不同部分，每个部分都有特定的设计和功能，它们精确地组合在一起，目的是让我的屁股舒适地离地板几英尺远。

Abstraction is enabled by encapsulation. Because we encapsulate objects, we can think about them as things which relate to each other in some way rather than getting bogged down in the subtle details of internal object structure. Abstraction is the ability to consider the bigger picture, removed from concern over little details. The root of the word is abstract as in the summary that appears at the top of a scholarly paper, not abstract as in a class which can only be instantiated as a derived subclass.

I can honestly say that when I plop my butt down in my chair, I never think about how the structure of that chair will catch and hold my weight. It's a decent enough chair that I don't have to worry about those details. So I can turn my attention toward my computer. And again, I don't think about the component parts of my computer. I'm just looking at a part of a webpage that represents a text area that I can type in, and I'm communicating in words, barely even thinking about how my fingers always find the right letters so quickly on the keyboard, and how the connection is ultimately made between tapping these keys and posting to this forum. This is the great power of abstraction. Because the lower levels of the system can be trusted to work with consistency and precision, we have attention to spare for greater work.