从这个

OOPS中封装和抽象的区别

抽象和封装是两个重要的面向对象编程(oop)概念。封装和抽象都是相互关联的术语。

封装和抽象的现实区别

封装意味着隐藏。封装也称为数据隐藏。你可以把胶囊想象成胶囊(药片)，里面藏着药。封装是包装，只是隐藏属性和方法。封装用于将代码和数据隐藏在单个单元中，以保护数据不受外界的影响。类是封装的最佳示例。

抽象指的是只向预期的用户显示必要的细节。顾名思义，抽象是“任何事物的抽象形式”。我们在编程语言中使用抽象来创建抽象类。抽象类表示类的方法和属性的抽象视图。

封装和抽象之间的实现差异

Abstraction is implemented using interface and abstract class while Encapsulation is implemented using private and protected access modifier. OOPS makes use of encapsulation to enforce the integrity of a type (i.e. to make sure data is used in an appropriate manner) by preventing programmers from accessing data in a non-intended manner. Through encapsulation, only a predetermined group of functions can access the data. The collective term for datatypes and operations (methods) bundled together with access restrictions (public/private, etc.) is a class.

一种防止特定对象的数据被外部函数故意或意外误用的机制叫做“数据封装”。

在不包括背景细节或解释的情况下表现基本特征的行为被称为抽象

简而言之:

抽象是一种帮助我们识别哪些特定信息是必要的，哪些信息应该隐藏的技术。

因此，封装是一种以隐藏对象的细节和实现细节的方式封装信息的技术。

我试图在抽象和封装之间画一条线，根据我的观点，抽象更多的是概念性的东西，而封装是抽象实现的一种。因为一个人可以隐藏数据而不封装，例如使用私有常数或变量;所以我们可以用数据隐藏进行封装，但数据隐藏并不总是封装。在下面这段代码中，我试图描述这些概念的最简单形式。

    // Abstraction
    interface IOperation
    {
        int SquareNumber();
    }

    public class Operation
    {
        // Data hiding
        private int number;

        public Operation(int _number)
        {
            this.number = _number;
        }

        // Encapsulation
        public int SquareNumber()
        {
            return number * number;
        }
    }

在行动,

IOperation obj = new Operation(2); 
// obj.number  <--- can't access because hidden from world using private access modifier but not encapsulated. 
obj.SquareNumber(); // cannot access internal logic to calculate square because logic is hidden using encapsulation.

抽象是对用户隐藏无用的数据 封装是将数据绑定到一个胶囊(类)中。 我认为封装是我们实现抽象的方式。

让我们以堆栈为例。它可以使用数组或链表来实现。但它支持的操作是推送和弹出。

Now abstraction is exposing only the interfaces push and pop. The underlying representation is hidden (is it an array or a linked list?) and a well-defined interface is provided. Now how do you ensure that no accidental access is made to the abstracted data? That is where encapsulation comes in. For example, classes in C++ use the access specifiers which ensure that accidental access and modification is prevented. And also, by making the above-mentioned interfaces as public, it ensures that the only way to manipulate the stack is through the well-defined interface. In the process, it has coupled the data and the code that can manipulate it (let's not get the friend functions involved here). That is, the code and data are bonded together or tied or encapsulated.