下面这段话帮助我理解了它们之间的区别:

数据封装是一种捆绑数据的机制 使用它们的函数和数据抽象是一种机制 只暴露接口，隐藏实现细节 来自用户。

你可以在这里阅读更多。

抽象或封装并不严格要求信息隐藏。信息可能会被忽略，但不一定要隐藏。

封装是一种将事物视为单一事物的能力，即使它可能由许多复杂的部分或思想组成。例如，我可以说我坐在一把“椅子”上，而不是指这把椅子上的许多不同部分，每个部分都有特定的设计和功能，它们精确地组合在一起，目的是让我的屁股舒适地离地板几英尺远。

Abstraction is enabled by encapsulation. Because we encapsulate objects, we can think about them as things which relate to each other in some way rather than getting bogged down in the subtle details of internal object structure. Abstraction is the ability to consider the bigger picture, removed from concern over little details. The root of the word is abstract as in the summary that appears at the top of a scholarly paper, not abstract as in a class which can only be instantiated as a derived subclass.

I can honestly say that when I plop my butt down in my chair, I never think about how the structure of that chair will catch and hold my weight. It's a decent enough chair that I don't have to worry about those details. So I can turn my attention toward my computer. And again, I don't think about the component parts of my computer. I'm just looking at a part of a webpage that represents a text area that I can type in, and I'm communicating in words, barely even thinking about how my fingers always find the right letters so quickly on the keyboard, and how the connection is ultimately made between tapping these keys and posting to this forum. This is the great power of abstraction. Because the lower levels of the system can be trusted to work with consistency and precision, we have attention to spare for greater work.

封装是抽象的一个例子。封装的全部意义在于抽象函数内部发生的事情，将所有的复杂性简化为一个符号(函数的引用或名称)，将函数变成一个黑盒。

在编程中，“抽象”一词是一个命令。当一个类继承了一个抽象类(或接口)时，您将被命令创建一个抽象。

封装是将复杂性包裹在一个胶囊中，即类&因此封装… 抽象是一个对象区别于其他对象的特征。

抽象可以通过使具有一个或多个抽象方法的类抽象来实现。它只是一个特性，应该由扩展它的类来实现。 例如，当你发明/设计一辆汽车时，你定义了一个特征，比如汽车应该有4个门、刹车、方向盘等，所以任何使用这种设计的人都应该包括这些特征。实现并不是抽象的首要部分。它只会定义应该包含的特征。

Encapsulation is achieved keeping data and the behaviour in one capsule that is class & by making use of access modifiers like public, private, protected along with inheritance, aggregation or composition. So you only show only required things, that too, only to the extent you want to show. i.e. public, protected, friendly & private ka funda…… e.g. GM decides to use the abstracted design of car above. But they have various products having the same characteristics & doing almost same functionality. So they write a class which extends the above abstract class. It says how gear box should work, how break should work, how steering wheel should work. Then all the products just use this common functionality. They need not know how the gear box works or break works or steering wheal works. Indivisual product can surely have more features like a/c or auto lock etc…..

两者都很强大;但是使用抽象需要比封装更多的技能，没有抽象，更大的应用程序/产品就无法生存。

这里的大多数答案都关注于OOP，但封装开始得更早:

Every function is an encapsulation; in pseudocode: point x = { 1, 4 } point y = { 23, 42 } numeric d = distance(x, y) Here, distance encapsulates the calculation of the (Euclidean) distance between two points in a plane: it hides implementation details. This is encapsulation, pure and simple. Abstraction is the process of generalisation: taking a concrete implementation and making it applicable to different, albeit somewhat related, types of data. The classical example of abstraction is C’s qsort function to sort data: The thing about qsort is that it doesn't care about the data it sorts — in fact, it doesn’t know what data it sorts. Rather, its input type is a typeless pointer (void*) which is just C’s way of saying “I don't care about the type of data” (this is also called type erasure). The important point is that the implementation of qsort always stays the same, regardless of data type. The only thing that has to change is the compare function, which differs from data type to data type. qsort therefore expects the user to provide said compare function as a function argument.

封装和抽象是密切相关的，因此您可以认为它们确实是不可分割的。就实际而言，这可能是对的;也就是说，这里有一个不太抽象的封装:

class point {
    numeric x
    numeric y
}

我们封装了点的坐标，但是我们没有实质性地将它们抽象出来，只是在逻辑上对它们进行分组。

这里有一个抽象的例子，它不是封装:

T pi<T> = 3.1415926535

这是一个具有给定值(π)的泛型变量pi，声明并不关心变量的确切类型。诚然，我很难在真实的代码中找到这样的东西:抽象实际上总是使用封装。然而，上面的内容在c++(14)中确实存在，通过变量模板(=变量的通用模板);使用稍微复杂一点的语法，例如:

template <typename T> constexpr T pi = T{3.1415926535};

抽象和封装都是用来隐藏数据的。但是有很大的不同。

封装

封装是将数据和对数据进行操作的代码绑定或包装成一个称为Class的单元的过程。

封装在实现级别解决了问题。

在类中，可以使用私有或受保护的访问修饰符来隐藏数据。

抽象

抽象是隐藏无关细节的概念。换句话说，通过对用户隐藏不必要的细节，使复杂的系统变得简单。

抽象在设计层面解决了问题。

可以通过在Java中创建接口和抽象类来实现抽象。

在ruby中，你可以通过创建模块来实现抽象。

示例:我们使用(收集，映射，减少，排序…)方法的枚举模块与数组和ruby哈希。