class Aeroplane : IFlyable, IFuelable, IMachine
{ // Aeroplane's Design says:
  // Aeroplane is a flying object
  // Aeroplane can be fueled
  // Aeroplane is a Machine
}
// But the code related to Pilot, or Driver of Aeroplane is not bothered 
// about Machine or Fuel. Hence,
// pilot code:
IFlyable flyingObj = new Aeroplane();
flyingObj.Fly();
// fighter Pilot related code
IFlyable flyingObj2 = new FighterAeroplane();
flyingObj2.Fly();
// UFO related code 
IFlyable ufoObj = new UFO();
ufoObj.Fly();
// **All the 3 Above codes are genaralized using IFlyable,
// Interface Abstraction**
// Fly related code knows how to fly, irrespective of the type of 
// flying object they are.

// Similarly, Fuel related code:
// Fueling an Aeroplane
IFuelable fuelableObj = new Aeroplane();
fuelableObj.FillFuel();
// Fueling a Car
IFuelable fuelableObj2 = new Car(); // class Car : IFuelable { }
fuelableObj2.FillFuel();

// ** Fueling code does not need know what kind of vehicle it is, so far 
// as it can Fill Fuel**

我认为封装是实现抽象的一种方式。看看下面的链接。

抽象和封装

封装把一些东西放在一个盒子里，给你一个窥视孔;这使你从混乱与齿轮。

抽象完全忽略了无关紧要的细节，比如物体是否有齿轮、棘轮、飞轮或核心;他们只是“走了”

封装的例子:

内裤 工具箱 钱包 手提包 胶囊 冷冻carbonite 一个盒子，上面有或没有按钮 一个墨西哥卷饼(严格来说，是卷饼周围的玉米粉圆饼)

抽象的例子:

“一组事物”是一种抽象(我们称之为聚合) “包含其他事物的事物”是一种抽象(我们称之为组合) “容器”是另一种“物装物”的抽象;注意，所有的封装示例都是不同种类的容器，但并不是所有的容器都展示/提供封装。例如，篮子是一种不封装其内容的容器。

让我用简单的代码示例来尝试一下

抽象=数据隐藏+封装

 // Abstraction
    interface IOperation
    {
        int GetSumOfNumbers();
    }
    internal class OperationEven : IOperation
    {
        // data hiding
        private IEnumerable<int> numbers;

        public OperationEven(IEnumerable<int> numbers)
        {
            this.numbers = numbers;
        }
        // Encapsulation
        public int GetSumOfNumbers()
        {
            return this.numbers.Where(i => i % 2 == 0).Sum();
        }
    }

这里的大多数答案都关注于OOP，但封装开始得更早:

Every function is an encapsulation; in pseudocode: point x = { 1, 4 } point y = { 23, 42 } numeric d = distance(x, y) Here, distance encapsulates the calculation of the (Euclidean) distance between two points in a plane: it hides implementation details. This is encapsulation, pure and simple. Abstraction is the process of generalisation: taking a concrete implementation and making it applicable to different, albeit somewhat related, types of data. The classical example of abstraction is C’s qsort function to sort data: The thing about qsort is that it doesn't care about the data it sorts — in fact, it doesn’t know what data it sorts. Rather, its input type is a typeless pointer (void*) which is just C’s way of saying “I don't care about the type of data” (this is also called type erasure). The important point is that the implementation of qsort always stays the same, regardless of data type. The only thing that has to change is the compare function, which differs from data type to data type. qsort therefore expects the user to provide said compare function as a function argument.

封装和抽象是密切相关的，因此您可以认为它们确实是不可分割的。就实际而言，这可能是对的;也就是说，这里有一个不太抽象的封装:

class point {
    numeric x
    numeric y
}

我们封装了点的坐标，但是我们没有实质性地将它们抽象出来，只是在逻辑上对它们进行分组。

这里有一个抽象的例子，它不是封装:

T pi<T> = 3.1415926535

这是一个具有给定值(π)的泛型变量pi，声明并不关心变量的确切类型。诚然，我很难在真实的代码中找到这样的东西:抽象实际上总是使用封装。然而，上面的内容在c++(14)中确实存在，通过变量模板(=变量的通用模板);使用稍微复杂一点的语法，例如:

template <typename T> constexpr T pi = T{3.1415926535};

有一件事，也许是其他答案忘记提到的一个基本的事情是，封装是抽象。因此，将两者进行对比并寻找差异是不准确的，而应该将封装视为一种抽象形式。