Java有一个方便的分割方法:

String str = "The quick brown fox";
String[] results = str.split(" ");

在c++中有简单的方法来做到这一点吗?


当前回答

在我看来很奇怪的是,SO网站上有这么多注重速度的书呆子,却没有人给出一个使用编译时生成的分隔符查找表的版本(下面是示例实现)。使用查找表和迭代器应该在效率上击败std::regex,如果你不需要击败regex,就使用它,它是c++ 11的标准,超级灵活。

有些人已经建议使用正则表达式,但对于新手来说,这里有一个打包的示例,应该完全符合OP的期望:

std::vector<std::string> split(std::string::const_iterator it, std::string::const_iterator end, std::regex e = std::regex{"\\w+"}){
    std::smatch m{};
    std::vector<std::string> ret{};
    while (std::regex_search (it,end,m,e)) {
        ret.emplace_back(m.str());              
        std::advance(it, m.position() + m.length()); //next start position = match position + match length
    }
    return ret;
}
std::vector<std::string> split(const std::string &s, std::regex e = std::regex{"\\w+"}){  //comfort version calls flexible version
    return split(s.cbegin(), s.cend(), std::move(e));
}
int main ()
{
    std::string str {"Some people, excluding those present, have been compile time constants - since puberty."};
    auto v = split(str);
    for(const auto&s:v){
        std::cout << s << std::endl;
    }
    std::cout << "crazy version:" << std::endl;
    v = split(str, std::regex{"[^e]+"});  //using e as delim shows flexibility
    for(const auto&s:v){
        std::cout << s << std::endl;
    }
    return 0;
}

如果我们需要更快并接受所有字符必须为8位的约束,我们可以在编译时使用元编程创建一个查找表:

template<bool...> struct BoolSequence{};        //just here to hold bools
template<char...> struct CharSequence{};        //just here to hold chars
template<typename T, char C> struct Contains;   //generic
template<char First, char... Cs, char Match>    //not first specialization
struct Contains<CharSequence<First, Cs...>,Match> :
    Contains<CharSequence<Cs...>, Match>{};     //strip first and increase index
template<char First, char... Cs>                //is first specialization
struct Contains<CharSequence<First, Cs...>,First>: std::true_type {}; 
template<char Match>                            //not found specialization
struct Contains<CharSequence<>,Match>: std::false_type{};

template<int I, typename T, typename U> 
struct MakeSequence;                            //generic
template<int I, bool... Bs, typename U> 
struct MakeSequence<I,BoolSequence<Bs...>, U>:  //not last
    MakeSequence<I-1, BoolSequence<Contains<U,I-1>::value,Bs...>, U>{};
template<bool... Bs, typename U> 
struct MakeSequence<0,BoolSequence<Bs...>,U>{   //last  
    using Type = BoolSequence<Bs...>;
};
template<typename T> struct BoolASCIITable;
template<bool... Bs> struct BoolASCIITable<BoolSequence<Bs...>>{
    /* could be made constexpr but not yet supported by MSVC */
    static bool isDelim(const char c){
        static const bool table[256] = {Bs...};
        return table[static_cast<int>(c)];
    }   
};
using Delims = CharSequence<'.',',',' ',':','\n'>;  //list your custom delimiters here
using Table = BoolASCIITable<typename MakeSequence<256,BoolSequence<>,Delims>::Type>;

有了这些,创建getNextToken函数就很容易了:

template<typename T_It>
std::pair<T_It,T_It> getNextToken(T_It begin,T_It end){
    begin = std::find_if(begin,end,std::not1(Table{})); //find first non delim or end
    auto second = std::find_if(begin,end,Table{});      //find first delim or end
    return std::make_pair(begin,second);
}

使用它也很简单:

int main() {
    std::string s{"Some people, excluding those present, have been compile time constants - since puberty."};
    auto it = std::begin(s);
    auto end = std::end(s);
    while(it != std::end(s)){
        auto token = getNextToken(it,end);
        std::cout << std::string(token.first,token.second) << std::endl;
        it = token.second;
    }
    return 0;
}

这里有一个生动的例子:http://ideone.com/GKtkLQ

其他回答

下面是一个示例标记器类,它可以实现您想要的功能

//Header file
class Tokenizer 
{
    public:
        static const std::string DELIMITERS;
        Tokenizer(const std::string& str);
        Tokenizer(const std::string& str, const std::string& delimiters);
        bool NextToken();
        bool NextToken(const std::string& delimiters);
        const std::string GetToken() const;
        void Reset();
    protected:
        size_t m_offset;
        const std::string m_string;
        std::string m_token;
        std::string m_delimiters;
};

//CPP file
const std::string Tokenizer::DELIMITERS(" \t\n\r");

Tokenizer::Tokenizer(const std::string& s) :
    m_string(s), 
    m_offset(0), 
    m_delimiters(DELIMITERS) {}

Tokenizer::Tokenizer(const std::string& s, const std::string& delimiters) :
    m_string(s), 
    m_offset(0), 
    m_delimiters(delimiters) {}

bool Tokenizer::NextToken() 
{
    return NextToken(m_delimiters);
}

bool Tokenizer::NextToken(const std::string& delimiters) 
{
    size_t i = m_string.find_first_not_of(delimiters, m_offset);
    if (std::string::npos == i) 
    {
        m_offset = m_string.length();
        return false;
    }

    size_t j = m_string.find_first_of(delimiters, i);
    if (std::string::npos == j) 
    {
        m_token = m_string.substr(i);
        m_offset = m_string.length();
        return true;
    }

    m_token = m_string.substr(i, j - i);
    m_offset = j;
    return true;
}

例子:

std::vector <std::string> v;
Tokenizer s("split this string", " ");
while (s.NextToken())
{
    v.push_back(s.GetToken());
}

我以前只用标准库做了一个lexer/tokenizer。代码如下:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <sstream>

using namespace std;

string seps(string& s) {
    if (!s.size()) return "";
    stringstream ss;
    ss << s[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < s.size(); i++) {
        ss << '|' << s[i];
    }
    return ss.str();
}

void Tokenize(string& str, vector<string>& tokens, const string& delimiters = " ")
{
    seps(str);

    // Skip delimiters at beginning.
    string::size_type lastPos = str.find_first_not_of(delimiters, 0);
    // Find first "non-delimiter".
    string::size_type pos = str.find_first_of(delimiters, lastPos);

    while (string::npos != pos || string::npos != lastPos)
    {
        // Found a token, add it to the vector.
        tokens.push_back(str.substr(lastPos, pos - lastPos));
        // Skip delimiters.  Note the "not_of"
        lastPos = str.find_first_not_of(delimiters, pos);
        // Find next "non-delimiter"
        pos = str.find_first_of(delimiters, lastPos);
    }
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    vector<string> t;
    string s = "Tokens for everyone!";

    Tokenize(s, t, "|");

    for (auto c : t)
        cout << c << endl;

    system("pause");

    return 0;
}

使用regex_token_iterators的解决方案:

#include <iostream>
#include <regex>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    string str("The quick brown fox");

    regex reg("\\s+");

    sregex_token_iterator iter(str.begin(), str.end(), reg, -1);
    sregex_token_iterator end;

    vector<string> vec(iter, end);

    for (auto a : vec)
    {
        cout << a << endl;
    }
}

If the maximum length of the input string to be tokenized is known, one can exploit this and implement a very fast version. I am sketching the basic idea below, which was inspired by both strtok() and the "suffix array"-data structure described Jon Bentley's "Programming Perls" 2nd edition, chapter 15. The C++ class in this case only gives some organization and convenience of use. The implementation shown can be easily extended for removing leading and trailing whitespace characters in the tokens.

基本上,可以将分隔符替换为以字符串结束的'\0'字符,并设置指向修改后字符串中的标记的指针。在极端情况下,当字符串仅由分隔符组成时,将得到字符串长度加1个空标记。复制要修改的字符串是可行的。

头文件:

class TextLineSplitter
{
public:

    TextLineSplitter( const size_t max_line_len );

    ~TextLineSplitter();

    void            SplitLine( const char *line,
                               const char sep_char = ',',
                             );

    inline size_t   NumTokens( void ) const
    {
        return mNumTokens;
    }

    const char *    GetToken( const size_t token_idx ) const
    {
        assert( token_idx < mNumTokens );
        return mTokens[ token_idx ];
    }

private:
    const size_t    mStorageSize;

    char           *mBuff;
    char          **mTokens;
    size_t          mNumTokens;

    inline void     ResetContent( void )
    {
        memset( mBuff, 0, mStorageSize );
        // mark all items as empty:
        memset( mTokens, 0, mStorageSize * sizeof( char* ) );
        // reset counter for found items:
        mNumTokens = 0L;
    }
};

Implementattion文件:

TextLineSplitter::TextLineSplitter( const size_t max_line_len ):
    mStorageSize ( max_line_len + 1L )
{
    // allocate memory
    mBuff   = new char  [ mStorageSize ];
    mTokens = new char* [ mStorageSize ];

    ResetContent();
}

TextLineSplitter::~TextLineSplitter()
{
    delete [] mBuff;
    delete [] mTokens;
}


void TextLineSplitter::SplitLine( const char *line,
                                  const char sep_char   /* = ',' */,
                                )
{
    assert( sep_char != '\0' );

    ResetContent();
    strncpy( mBuff, line, mMaxLineLen );

    size_t idx       = 0L; // running index for characters

    do
    {
        assert( idx < mStorageSize );

        const char chr = line[ idx ]; // retrieve current character

        if( mTokens[ mNumTokens ] == NULL )
        {
            mTokens[ mNumTokens ] = &mBuff[ idx ];
        } // if

        if( chr == sep_char || chr == '\0' )
        { // item or line finished
            // overwrite separator with a 0-terminating character:
            mBuff[ idx ] = '\0';
            // count-up items:
            mNumTokens ++;
        } // if

    } while( line[ idx++ ] );
}

使用的场景是:

// create an instance capable of splitting strings up to 1000 chars long:
TextLineSplitter spl( 1000 );
spl.SplitLine( "Item1,,Item2,Item3" );
for( size_t i = 0; i < spl.NumTokens(); i++ )
{
    printf( "%s\n", spl.GetToken( i ) );
}

输出:

Item1

Item2
Item3

使用strtok。在我看来,没有必要围绕标记化构建类,除非strtok不能提供您所需要的东西。可能不会,但在用C和c++编写各种解析代码的15年多时间里,我一直在使用strtok。这里有一个例子

char myString[] = "The quick brown fox";
char *p = strtok(myString, " ");
while (p) {
    printf ("Token: %s\n", p);
    p = strtok(NULL, " ");
}

一些注意事项(可能不适合您的需要)。该字符串在该过程中被“销毁”,这意味着EOS字符内联放置在分隔符点中。正确的用法可能需要创建字符串的非const版本。还可以在解析过程中更改分隔符列表。

在我看来,上面的代码比为它单独编写一个类要简单得多,也更容易使用。对我来说,这是语言提供的功能之一,而且它做得很好,很干净。这只是一个“基于C”的解决方案。它很合适,很简单,而且你不需要写很多额外的代码:-)