该解决方案还提供了在给定的板中搜索的方向

一件事:

1. Uses trie to save all the word in the english to fasten the search
2. The uses DFS to search the words in Boggle

输出:

Found "pic" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → →
Found "pick" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑
Found "pickman" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↑ ↖ ↑
Found "picket" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↖
Found "picked" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↘
Found "pickle" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↘ →

代码:

from collections import defaultdict
from nltk.corpus import words
from nltk.corpus import stopwords
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize

english_words = words.words()

# If you wan to remove stop words
# stop_words = set(stopwords.words('english'))
# english_words = [w for w in english_words if w not in stop_words]

boggle = [
    ['c', 'n', 't', 's', 's'],
    ['d', 'a', 't', 'i', 'n'],
    ['o', 'o', 'm', 'e', 'l'],
    ['s', 'i', 'k', 'n', 'd'],
    ['p', 'i', 'c', 'l', 'e']
]

# Instead of X and Y co-ordinates
# better to use Row and column
lenc = len(boggle[0])
lenr = len(boggle)

# Initialize trie datastructure
trie_node = {'valid': False, 'next': {}}

# lets get the delta to find all the nighbors
neighbors_delta = [
    (-1,-1, "↖"),
    (-1, 0, "↑"),
    (-1, 1, "↗"),
    (0, -1, "←"),
    (0,  1, "→"),
    (1, -1, "↙"),
    (1,  0, "↓"),
    (1,  1, "↘"),
]


def gen_trie(word, node):
    """udpates the trie datastructure using the given word"""
    if not word:
        return

    if word[0] not in node:
        node[word[0]] = {'valid': len(word) == 1, 'next': {}}

    # recursively build trie
    gen_trie(word[1:], node[word[0]])


def build_trie(words, trie):
    """Builds trie data structure from the list of words given"""
    for word in words:
        gen_trie(word, trie)
    return trie


def get_neighbors(r, c):
    """Returns the neighbors for a given co-ordinates"""
    n = []
    for neigh in neighbors_delta:
        new_r = r + neigh[0]
        new_c = c + neigh[1]

        if (new_r >= lenr) or (new_c >= lenc) or (new_r < 0) or (new_c < 0):
            continue
        n.append((new_r, new_c, neigh[2]))
    return n


def dfs(r, c, visited, trie, now_word, direction):
    """Scan the graph using DFS"""
    if (r, c) in visited:
        return

    letter = boggle[r][c]
    visited.append((r, c))

    if letter in trie:
        now_word += letter

        if trie[letter]['valid']:
            print('Found "{}" {}'.format(now_word, direction))

        neighbors = get_neighbors(r, c)
        for n in neighbors:
            dfs(n[0], n[1], visited[::], trie[letter], now_word, direction + " " + n[2])


def main(trie_node):
    """Initiate the search for words in boggle"""
    trie_node = build_trie(english_words, trie_node)

    # print the board
    print("Given board")
    for i in range(lenr):print (boggle[i])
    print ('\n')

    for r in range(lenr):
        for c in range(lenc):
            letter = boggle[r][c]
            dfs(r, c, [], trie_node, '', 'directions from ({},{})({}) go '.format(r, c, letter))


if __name__ == '__main__':
    main(trie_node)

我不得不对一个完整的解决方案进行更多的思考，但作为一种方便的优化，我想知道是否值得根据字典中的所有单词预先计算一个图表和三字母组合(2字母和3字母组合)的频率表，并使用它来确定搜索的优先级。我会选择单词的首字母。因此，如果你的字典包含“印度”、“水”、“极端”和“非凡”这些词，那么你预先计算的表可能是:

'IN': 1
'WA': 1
'EX': 2

然后按照共性的顺序(首先是EX，然后是WA/ in)搜索这些图表

我认为你可能会花大部分时间去匹配那些不可能由你的字母网格构成的单词。所以，我要做的第一件事就是加快这一步，这应该能让你大致达到目的。

为此，我将把网格重新表示为一个可能的“移动”表，您可以根据您正在查看的字母转换对其进行索引。

首先从你的字母表中给每个字母分配一个数字(a =0, B=1, C=2，…等等)。

让我们举个例子:

h b c d
e e g h
l l k l
m o f p

现在，让我们使用现有字母的字母表(通常你可能每次都想使用相同的字母表):

 b | c | d | e | f | g | h | k | l | m |  o |  p
---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+----+----
 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11

然后你创建一个2D布尔数组，告诉你是否有某个字母转换可用:

     |  0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11  <- from letter
     |  b  c  d  e  f  g  h  k  l  m  o  p
-----+--------------------------------------
 0 b |     T     T     T  T     
 1 c |  T     T  T     T  T
 2 d |     T           T  T
 3 e |  T  T     T     T  T  T  T
 4 f |                       T  T     T  T
 5 g |  T  T  T  T        T  T  T
 6 h |  T  T  T  T     T     T  T
 7 k |           T  T  T  T     T     T  T
 8 l |           T  T  T  T  T  T  T  T  T
 9 m |                          T     T
10 o |              T        T  T  T
11 p |              T        T  T
 ^
 to letter

现在浏览单词列表，将单词转换为过渡段:

hello (6, 3, 8, 8, 10):
6 -> 3, 3 -> 8, 8 -> 8, 8 -> 10

然后检查这些转换是否允许通过在你的表中查找它们:

[6][ 3] : T
[3][ 8] : T
[8][ 8] : T
[8][10] : T

如果它们都被允许，就有可能找到这个词。

例如，单词“头盔”可以在第4个转换(m到e:头盔)时被排除，因为表中的这个条目是假的。

单词hamster可以被排除，因为第一个(h到a)的转换是不允许的(在你的表中甚至不存在)。

现在，对于可能剩下的很少几个你没有删除的单词，试着按照你现在做的方法或在这里的其他答案中建议的方法在网格中找到它们。这是为了避免网格中相同字母之间的跳转导致的误报。例如，表格允许使用单词“help”，但网格不允许。

关于这个想法的一些进一步的性能改进技巧:

Instead of using a 2D array, use a 1D array and simply compute the index of the second letter yourself. So, instead of a 12x12 array like above, make a 1D array of length 144. If you then always use the same alphabet (i.e. a 26x26 = 676x1 array for the standard english alphabet), even if not all letters show up in your grid, you can pre-compute the indices into this 1D array that you need to test to match your dictionary words. For example, the indices for 'hello' in the example above would be hello (6, 3, 8, 8, 10): 42 (from 6 + 3x12), 99, 104, 128 -> "hello" will be stored as 42, 99, 104, 128 in the dictionary Extend the idea to a 3D table (expressed as a 1D array), i.e. all allowed 3-letter combinations. That way you can eliminate even more words immediately and you reduce the number of array lookups for each word by 1: For 'hello', you only need 3 array lookups: hel, ell, llo. It will be very quick to build this table, by the way, as there are only 400 possible 3-letter-moves in your grid. Pre-compute the indices of the moves in your grid that you need to include in your table. For the example above, you need to set the following entries to 'True': (0,0) (0,1) -> here: h, b : [6][0] (0,0) (1,0) -> here: h, e : [6][3] (0,0) (1,1) -> here: h, e : [6][3] (0,1) (0,0) -> here: b, h : [0][6] (0,1) (0,2) -> here: b, c : [0][1] . : Also represent your game grid in a 1-D array with 16 entries and have the table pre-computed in 3. contain the indices into this array.

我相信如果您使用这种方法，您可以让您的代码运行得非常快，如果您预先计算了字典并已经加载到内存中。

顺便说一句:如果你正在创造一款游戏，你可以在后台立即运行这些内容。在用户仍然盯着你的应用标题屏幕，并将手指放在按“Play”的位置时开始生成和解决第一款游戏。然后在用户玩前一款游戏时生成并解决下一款游戏。这应该会给您很多时间来运行代码。

(我喜欢这个问题，所以我可能会忍不住在未来几天的某个时候用Java实现我的提议，看看它实际上是如何执行的……一旦我这样做，我将在这里张贴代码。)

更新:

好的，我今天有一些时间在Java中实现了这个想法:

class DictionaryEntry {
  public int[] letters;
  public int[] triplets;
}

class BoggleSolver {

  // Constants
  final int ALPHABET_SIZE = 5;  // up to 2^5 = 32 letters
  final int BOARD_SIZE    = 4;  // 4x4 board
  final int[] moves = {-BOARD_SIZE-1, -BOARD_SIZE, -BOARD_SIZE+1, 
                                  -1,                         +1,
                       +BOARD_SIZE-1, +BOARD_SIZE, +BOARD_SIZE+1};


  // Technically constant (calculated here for flexibility, but should be fixed)
  DictionaryEntry[] dictionary; // Processed word list
  int maxWordLength = 0;
  int[] boardTripletIndices; // List of all 3-letter moves in board coordinates

  DictionaryEntry[] buildDictionary(String fileName) throws IOException {
    BufferedReader fileReader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fileName));
    String word = fileReader.readLine();
    ArrayList<DictionaryEntry> result = new ArrayList<DictionaryEntry>();
    while (word!=null) {
      if (word.length()>=3) {
        word = word.toUpperCase();
        if (word.length()>maxWordLength) maxWordLength = word.length();
        DictionaryEntry entry = new DictionaryEntry();
        entry.letters  = new int[word.length()  ];
        entry.triplets = new int[word.length()-2];
        int i=0;
        for (char letter: word.toCharArray()) {
          entry.letters[i] = (byte) letter - 65; // Convert ASCII to 0..25
          if (i>=2)
            entry.triplets[i-2] = (((entry.letters[i-2]  << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                                     entry.letters[i-1]) << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                                     entry.letters[i];
          i++;
        }
        result.add(entry);
      }
      word = fileReader.readLine();
    }
    return result.toArray(new DictionaryEntry[result.size()]);
  }

  boolean isWrap(int a, int b) { // Checks if move a->b wraps board edge (like 3->4)
    return Math.abs(a%BOARD_SIZE-b%BOARD_SIZE)>1;
  }

  int[] buildTripletIndices() {
    ArrayList<Integer> result = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    for (int a=0; a<BOARD_SIZE*BOARD_SIZE; a++)
      for (int bm: moves) {
        int b=a+bm;
        if ((b>=0) && (b<board.length) && !isWrap(a, b))
          for (int cm: moves) {
            int c=b+cm;
            if ((c>=0) && (c<board.length) && (c!=a) && !isWrap(b, c)) {
              result.add(a);
              result.add(b);
              result.add(c);
            }
          }
      }
    int[] result2 = new int[result.size()];
    int i=0;
    for (Integer r: result) result2[i++] = r;
    return result2;
  }


  // Variables that depend on the actual game layout
  int[] board = new int[BOARD_SIZE*BOARD_SIZE]; // Letters in board
  boolean[] possibleTriplets = new boolean[1 << (ALPHABET_SIZE*3)];

  DictionaryEntry[] candidateWords;
  int candidateCount;

  int[] usedBoardPositions;

  DictionaryEntry[] foundWords;
  int foundCount;

  void initializeBoard(String[] letters) {
    for (int row=0; row<BOARD_SIZE; row++)
      for (int col=0; col<BOARD_SIZE; col++)
        board[row*BOARD_SIZE + col] = (byte) letters[row].charAt(col) - 65;
  }

  void setPossibleTriplets() {
    Arrays.fill(possibleTriplets, false); // Reset list
    int i=0;
    while (i<boardTripletIndices.length) {
      int triplet = (((board[boardTripletIndices[i++]]  << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                       board[boardTripletIndices[i++]]) << ALPHABET_SIZE) +
                       board[boardTripletIndices[i++]];
      possibleTriplets[triplet] = true; 
    }
  }

  void checkWordTriplets() {
    candidateCount = 0;
    for (DictionaryEntry entry: dictionary) {
      boolean ok = true;
      int len = entry.triplets.length;
      for (int t=0; (t<len) && ok; t++)
        ok = possibleTriplets[entry.triplets[t]];
      if (ok) candidateWords[candidateCount++] = entry;
    }
  }

  void checkWords() { // Can probably be optimized a lot
    foundCount = 0;
    for (int i=0; i<candidateCount; i++) {
      DictionaryEntry candidate = candidateWords[i];
      for (int j=0; j<board.length; j++)
        if (board[j]==candidate.letters[0]) { 
          usedBoardPositions[0] = j;
          if (checkNextLetters(candidate, 1, j)) {
            foundWords[foundCount++] = candidate;
            break;
          }
        }
    }
  }

  boolean checkNextLetters(DictionaryEntry candidate, int letter, int pos) {
    if (letter==candidate.letters.length) return true;
    int match = candidate.letters[letter];
    for (int move: moves) {
      int next=pos+move;
      if ((next>=0) && (next<board.length) && (board[next]==match) && !isWrap(pos, next)) {
        boolean ok = true;
        for (int i=0; (i<letter) && ok; i++)
          ok = usedBoardPositions[i]!=next;
        if (ok) {
          usedBoardPositions[letter] = next;
          if (checkNextLetters(candidate, letter+1, next)) return true;
        }
      }
    }   
    return false;
  }


  // Just some helper functions
  String formatTime(long start, long end, long repetitions) {
    long time = (end-start)/repetitions;
    return time/1000000 + "." + (time/100000) % 10 + "" + (time/10000) % 10 + "ms";
  }

  String getWord(DictionaryEntry entry) {
    char[] result = new char[entry.letters.length];
    int i=0;
    for (int letter: entry.letters)
      result[i++] = (char) (letter+97);
    return new String(result);
  }

  void run() throws IOException {
    long start = System.nanoTime();

    // The following can be pre-computed and should be replaced by constants
    dictionary = buildDictionary("C:/TWL06.txt");
    boardTripletIndices = buildTripletIndices();
    long precomputed = System.nanoTime();


    // The following only needs to run once at the beginning of the program
    candidateWords     = new DictionaryEntry[dictionary.length]; // WAAAY too generous
    foundWords         = new DictionaryEntry[dictionary.length]; // WAAAY too generous
    usedBoardPositions = new int[maxWordLength];
    long initialized = System.nanoTime(); 

    for (int n=1; n<=100; n++) {
      // The following needs to run again for every new board
      initializeBoard(new String[] {"DGHI",
                                    "KLPS",
                                    "YEUT",
                                    "EORN"});
      setPossibleTriplets();
      checkWordTriplets();
      checkWords();
    }
    long solved = System.nanoTime();


    // Print out result and statistics
    System.out.println("Precomputation finished in " + formatTime(start, precomputed, 1)+":");
    System.out.println("  Words in the dictionary: "+dictionary.length);
    System.out.println("  Longest word:            "+maxWordLength+" letters");
    System.out.println("  Number of triplet-moves: "+boardTripletIndices.length/3);
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Initialization finished in " + formatTime(precomputed, initialized, 1));
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Board solved in "+formatTime(initialized, solved, 100)+":");
    System.out.println("  Number of candidates: "+candidateCount);
    System.out.println("  Number of actual words: "+foundCount);
    System.out.println();

    System.out.println("Words found:");
    int w=0;
    System.out.print("  ");
    for (int i=0; i<foundCount; i++) {
      System.out.print(getWord(foundWords[i]));
      w++;
      if (w==10) {
        w=0;
        System.out.println(); System.out.print("  ");
      } else
        if (i<foundCount-1) System.out.print(", ");
    }
    System.out.println();
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    new BoggleSolver().run();
  }
}

以下是一些结果:

对于原始问题(DGHI…)中发布的图片的网格:

Precomputation finished in 239.59ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 408

Initialization finished in 0.22ms

Board solved in 3.70ms:
  Number of candidates: 230
  Number of actual words: 163 

Words found:
  eek, eel, eely, eld, elhi, elk, ern, erupt, erupts, euro
  eye, eyer, ghi, ghis, glee, gley, glue, gluer, gluey, glut
  gluts, hip, hiply, hips, his, hist, kelp, kelps, kep, kepi
  kepis, keps, kept, kern, key, kye, lee, lek, lept, leu
  ley, lunt, lunts, lure, lush, lust, lustre, lye, nus, nut
  nuts, ore, ort, orts, ouph, ouphs, our, oust, out, outre
  outs, oyer, pee, per, pert, phi, phis, pis, pish, plus
  plush, ply, plyer, psi, pst, pul, pule, puler, pun, punt
  punts, pur, pure, puree, purely, pus, push, put, puts, ree
  rely, rep, reply, reps, roe, roue, roup, roups, roust, rout
  routs, rue, rule, ruly, run, runt, runts, rupee, rush, rust
  rut, ruts, ship, shlep, sip, sipe, spue, spun, spur, spurn
  spurt, strep, stroy, stun, stupe, sue, suer, sulk, sulker, sulky
  sun, sup, supe, super, sure, surely, tree, trek, trey, troupe
  troy, true, truly, tule, tun, tup, tups, turn, tush, ups
  urn, uts, yeld, yelk, yelp, yelps, yep, yeps, yore, you
  your, yourn, yous

对于在原始问题中作为示例发布的信件(FXIE…)

Precomputation finished in 239.68ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 408

Initialization finished in 0.21ms

Board solved in 3.69ms:
  Number of candidates: 87
  Number of actual words: 76

Words found:
  amble, ambo, ami, amie, asea, awa, awe, awes, awl, axil
  axile, axle, boil, bole, box, but, buts, east, elm, emboli
  fame, fames, fax, lei, lie, lima, limb, limbo, limbs, lime
  limes, lob, lobs, lox, mae, maes, maw, maws, max, maxi
  mesa, mew, mewl, mews, mil, mile, milo, mix, oil, ole
  sae, saw, sea, seam, semi, sew, stub, swam, swami, tub
  tubs, tux, twa, twae, twaes, twas, uts, wae, waes, wamble
  wame, wames, was, wast, wax, west

对于以下5x5网格:

R P R I T
A H H L N
I E T E P
Z R Y S G
O G W E Y

它给出了这个:

Precomputation finished in 240.39ms:
  Words in the dictionary: 178590
  Longest word:            15 letters
  Number of triplet-moves: 768

Initialization finished in 0.23ms

Board solved in 3.85ms:
  Number of candidates: 331
  Number of actual words: 240

Words found:
  aero, aery, ahi, air, airt, airth, airts, airy, ear, egest
  elhi, elint, erg, ergo, ester, eth, ether, eye, eyen, eyer
  eyes, eyre, eyrie, gel, gelt, gelts, gen, gent, gentil, gest
  geste, get, gets, gey, gor, gore, gory, grey, greyest, greys
  gyre, gyri, gyro, hae, haet, haets, hair, hairy, hap, harp
  heap, hear, heh, heir, help, helps, hen, hent, hep, her
  hero, hes, hest, het, hetero, heth, hets, hey, hie, hilt
  hilts, hin, hint, hire, hit, inlet, inlets, ire, leg, leges
  legs, lehr, lent, les, lest, let, lethe, lets, ley, leys
  lin, line, lines, liney, lint, lit, neg, negs, nest, nester
  net, nether, nets, nil, nit, ogre, ore, orgy, ort, orts
  pah, pair, par, peg, pegs, peh, pelt, pelter, peltry, pelts
  pen, pent, pes, pest, pester, pesty, pet, peter, pets, phi
  philter, philtre, phiz, pht, print, pst, rah, rai, rap, raphe
  raphes, reap, rear, rei, ret, rete, rets, rhaphe, rhaphes, rhea
  ria, rile, riles, riley, rin, rye, ryes, seg, sel, sen
  sent, senti, set, sew, spelt, spelter, spent, splent, spline, splint
  split, stent, step, stey, stria, striae, sty, stye, tea, tear
  teg, tegs, tel, ten, tent, thae, the, their, then, these
  thesp, they, thin, thine, thir, thirl, til, tile, tiles, tilt
  tilter, tilth, tilts, tin, tine, tines, tirl, trey, treys, trog
  try, tye, tyer, tyes, tyre, tyro, west, wester, wry, wryest
  wye, wyes, wyte, wytes, yea, yeah, year, yeh, yelp, yelps
  yen, yep, yeps, yes, yester, yet, yew, yews, zero, zori

为此，我使用了TWL06锦标赛拼字词列表，因为原始问题中的链接不再有效。这个文件是1.85MB，所以略短一些。buildDictionary函数抛出所有小于3个字母的单词。

以下是对其性能的一些观察:

It's about 10 times slower than the reported performance of Victor Nicollet's OCaml implementation. Whether this is caused by the different algorithm, the shorter dictionary he used, the fact that his code is compiled and mine runs in a Java virtual machine, or the performance of our computers (mine is an Intel Q6600 @ 2.4MHz running WinXP), I don't know. But it's much faster than the results for the other implementations quoted at the end of the original question. So, whether this algorithm is superior to the trie dictionary or not, I don't know at this point. The table method used in checkWordTriplets() yields a very good approximation to the actual answers. Only 1 in 3-5 words passed by it will fail the checkWords() test (See number of candidates vs. number of actual words above). Something you can't see above: The checkWordTriplets() function takes about 3.65ms and is therefore fully dominant in the search process. The checkWords() function takes up pretty much the remaining 0.05-0.20 ms. The execution time of the checkWordTriplets() function depends linearly on the dictionary size and is virtually independent of board size! The execution time of checkWords() depends on the board size and the number of words not ruled out by checkWordTriplets(). The checkWords() implementation above is the dumbest first version I came up with. It is basically not optimized at all. But compared to checkWordTriplets() it is irrelevant for the total performance of the application, so I didn't worry about it. But, if the board size gets bigger, this function will get slower and slower and will eventually start to matter. Then, it would need to be optimized as well. One nice thing about this code is its flexibility: You can easily change the board size: Update line 10 and the String array passed to initializeBoard(). It can support larger/different alphabets and can handle things like treating 'Qu' as one letter without any performance overhead. To do this, one would need to update line 9 and the couple of places where characters are converted to numbers (currently simply by subtracting 65 from the ASCII value)

好吧，但我觉得现在这篇文章已经足够长了。我当然可以回答你可能有的任何问题，但让我们把它转移到评论。

这是我想出的解决填字游戏的办法。我想这是最“python”的做事方式:

from itertools import combinations
from itertools import izip
from math import fabs

def isAllowedStep(current,step,length,doubleLength):
            # for step == length -1 not to be 0 => trivial solutions are not allowed
    return length > 1 and \
           current + step < doubleLength and current - step > 0 and \
           ( step == 1 or step == -1 or step <= length+1 or step >= length - 1)

def getPairwiseList(someList):
    iterableList = iter(someList)
    return izip(iterableList, iterableList)

def isCombinationAllowed(combination,length,doubleLength):

    for (first,second) in  getPairwiseList(combination):
        _, firstCoordinate = first
        _, secondCoordinate = second
        if not isAllowedStep(firstCoordinate, fabs(secondCoordinate-firstCoordinate),length,doubleLength):
            return False
    return True

def extractSolution(combinations):
    return ["".join([x[0] for x in combinationTuple]) for combinationTuple in combinations]


length = 4
text = tuple("".join("fxie amlo ewbx astu".split()))
textIndices = tuple(range(len(text)))
coordinates = zip(text,textIndices)

validCombinations = [combination for combination in combinations(coordinates,length) if isCombinationAllowed(combination,length,length*length)]
solution = extractSolution(validCombinations)

我善意地建议你不要将这部分用于所有可能的匹配，但它实际上提供了一种检查你生成的单词是否真的构成有效单词的可能性:

import mechanize
def checkWord(word):
    url = "https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/search?filter=dictionary&query="+word
    br = mechanize.Browser()
    br.set_handle_robots(False)
    response = br.open(url)
    text = response.read()
    return "no exact matches"  not in text.lower()

print [valid for valid in solution[:10] if checkWord(valid)]

我建议根据单词做一个字母树。这棵树将由字母结构组成，像这样:

letter: char
isWord: boolean

然后构建树，每个深度添加一个新字母。换句话说，第一层是字母表;然后从这些树中，会有另外26个条目，以此类推，直到你把所有的单词都拼出来。坚持这个解析树，它将使所有可能的答案更快地查找。

使用这个解析过的树，您可以非常快速地找到解决方案。下面是伪代码:

BEGIN: 
    For each letter:
        if the struct representing it on the current depth has isWord == true, enter it as an answer.
        Cycle through all its neighbors; if there is a child of the current node corresponding to the letter, recursively call BEGIN on it.

这可以通过一些动态编程来加快。例如，在你的样本中，两个“A”都在一个“E”和一个“W”旁边，这(从它们击中它们的点来看)是相同的。我没有足够的时间来详细说明这个代码，但我想你们可以理解。

此外，我相信你会找到其他解决方案，如果你谷歌“Boggle solver”。

当我看到问题陈述时，我想到了“Trie”。但看到其他一些海报使用了这种方法，我寻找另一种不同的方法。可惜的是，Trie方法表现更好。我在我的机器上运行了Kent的Perl解决方案，在调整它以使用我的字典文件后，它花了0.31秒运行。我自己的perl实现需要0.54秒才能运行。

这就是我的方法:

Create a transition hash to model the legal transitions. Iterate through all 16^3 possible three letter combinations. In the loop, exclude illegal transitions and repeat visits to the same square. Form all the legal 3-letter sequences and store them in a hash. Then loop through all words in the dictionary. Exclude words that are too long or short Slide a 3-letter window across each word and see if it is among the 3-letter combos from step 2. Exclude words that fail. This eliminates most non-matches. If still not eliminated, use a recursive algorithm to see if the word can be formed by making paths through the puzzle. (This part is slow, but called infrequently.) Print out the words I found. I tried 3-letter and 4-letter sequences, but 4-letter sequences slowed the program down.

在我的代码中，我使用/usr/share/dict/words作为我的字典。它是MAC OS X和许多Unix系统的标准配置。如果你愿意，你可以使用另一个文件。要破解不同的谜题，只需更改变量@puzzle。这将很容易适应更大的矩阵。你只需要改变%transitions哈希值和%legalTransitions哈希值。

这种解决方案的优点是代码短，数据结构简单。

下面是Perl代码(我知道它使用了太多的全局变量):

#!/usr/bin/perl
use Time::HiRes  qw{ time };

sub readFile($);
sub findAllPrefixes($);
sub isWordTraceable($);
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@);

my $startTime = time;

# Puzzle to solve

my @puzzle = ( 
    F, X, I, E,
    A, M, L, O,
    E, W, B, X,
    A, S, T, U
);

my $minimumWordLength = 3;
my $maximumPrefixLength = 3; # I tried four and it slowed down.

# Slurp the word list.
my $wordlistFile = "/usr/share/dict/words";

my @words = split(/\n/, uc(readFile($wordlistFile)));
print "Words loaded from word list: " . scalar @words . "\n";

print "Word file load time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";
my $postLoad = time;

# Define the legal transitions from one letter position to another. 
# Positions are numbered 0-15.
#     0  1  2  3
#     4  5  6  7
#     8  9 10 11
#    12 13 14 15
my %transitions = ( 
   -1 => [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15],
    0 => [1,4,5], 
    1 => [0,2,4,5,6],
    2 => [1,3,5,6,7],
    3 => [2,6,7],
    4 => [0,1,5,8,9],
    5 => [0,1,2,4,6,8,9,10],
    6 => [1,2,3,5,7,9,10,11],
    7 => [2,3,6,10,11],
    8 => [4,5,9,12,13],
    9 => [4,5,6,8,10,12,13,14],
    10 => [5,6,7,9,11,13,14,15],
    11 => [6,7,10,14,15],
    12 => [8,9,13],
    13 => [8,9,10,12,14],
    14 => [9,10,11,13,15],
    15 => [10,11,14]
);

# Convert the transition matrix into a hash for easy access.
my %legalTransitions = ();
foreach my $start (keys %transitions) {
    my $legalRef = $transitions{$start};
    foreach my $stop (@$legalRef) {
        my $index = ($start + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($stop + 1);
        $legalTransitions{$index} = 1;
    }
}

my %prefixesInPuzzle = findAllPrefixes($maximumPrefixLength);

print "Find prefixes time: " . (time - $postLoad) . "\n";
my $postPrefix = time;

my @wordsFoundInPuzzle = findWordsInPuzzle(@words);

print "Find words in puzzle time: " . (time - $postPrefix) . "\n";

print "Unique prefixes found: " . (scalar keys %prefixesInPuzzle) . "\n";
print "Words found (" . (scalar @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . ") :\n    " . join("\n    ", @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . "\n";

print "Total Elapsed time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";

###########################################

sub readFile($) {
    my ($filename) = @_;
    my $contents;
    if (-e $filename) {
        # This is magic: it opens and reads a file into a scalar in one line of code. 
        # See http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2003/11/21/slurp.html
        $contents = do { local( @ARGV, $/ ) = $filename ; <> } ; 
    }
    else {
        $contents = '';
    }
    return $contents;
}

# Is it legal to move from the first position to the second? They must be adjacent.
sub isLegalTransition($$) {
    my ($pos1,$pos2) = @_;
    my $index = ($pos1 + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($pos2 + 1);
    return $legalTransitions{$index};
}

# Find all prefixes where $minimumWordLength <= length <= $maxPrefixLength
#
#   $maxPrefixLength ... Maximum length of prefix we will store. Three gives best performance. 
sub findAllPrefixes($) {
    my ($maxPrefixLength) = @_;
    my %prefixes = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;

    # Every possible N-letter combination of the letters in the puzzle 
    # can be represented as an integer, though many of those combinations
    # involve illegal transitions, duplicated letters, etc.
    # Iterate through all those possibilities and eliminate the illegal ones.
    my $maxIndex = $puzzleSize ** $maxPrefixLength;

    for (my $i = 0; $i < $maxIndex; $i++) {
        my @path;
        my $remainder = $i;
        my $prevPosition = -1;
        my $prefix = '';
        my %usedPositions = ();
        for (my $prefixLength = 1; $prefixLength <= $maxPrefixLength; $prefixLength++) {
            my $position = $remainder % $puzzleSize;

            # Is this a valid step?
            #  a. Is the transition legal (to an adjacent square)?
            if (! isLegalTransition($prevPosition, $position)) {
                last;
            }

            #  b. Have we repeated a square?
            if ($usedPositions{$position}) {
                last;
            }
            else {
                $usedPositions{$position} = 1;
            }

            # Record this prefix if length >= $minimumWordLength.
            $prefix .= $puzzle[$position];
            if ($prefixLength >= $minimumWordLength) {
                $prefixes{$prefix} = 1;
            }

            push @path, $position;
            $remainder -= $position;
            $remainder /= $puzzleSize;
            $prevPosition = $position;
        } # end inner for
    } # end outer for
    return %prefixes;
}

# Loop through all words in dictionary, looking for ones that are in the puzzle.
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@) {
    my @allWords = @_;
    my @wordsFound = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;
WORD: foreach my $word (@allWords) {
        my $wordLength = length($word);
        if ($wordLength > $puzzleSize || $wordLength < $minimumWordLength) {
            # Reject word as too short or too long.
        }
        elsif ($wordLength <= $maximumPrefixLength ) {
            # Word should be in the prefix hash.
            if ($prefixesInPuzzle{$word}) {
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }
        else {
            # Scan through the word using a window of length $maximumPrefixLength, looking for any strings not in our prefix list.
            # If any are found that are not in the list, this word is not possible.
            # If no non-matches are found, we have more work to do.
            my $limit = $wordLength - $maximumPrefixLength + 1;
            for (my $startIndex = 0; $startIndex < $limit; $startIndex ++) {
                if (! $prefixesInPuzzle{substr($word, $startIndex, $maximumPrefixLength)}) {
                    next WORD;
                }
            }
            if (isWordTraceable($word)) {
                # Additional test necessary: see if we can form this word by following legal transitions
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }

    }
    return @wordsFound;
}

# Is it possible to trace out the word using only legal transitions?
sub isWordTraceable($) {
    my $word = shift;
    return traverse([split(//, $word)], [-1]); # Start at special square -1, which may transition to any square in the puzzle.
}

# Recursively look for a path through the puzzle that matches the word.
sub traverse($$) {
    my ($lettersRef, $pathRef) = @_;
    my $index = scalar @$pathRef - 1;
    my $position = $pathRef->[$index];
    my $letter = $lettersRef->[$index];
    my $branchesRef =  $transitions{$position};
BRANCH: foreach my $branch (@$branchesRef) {
            if ($puzzle[$branch] eq $letter) {
                # Have we used this position yet?
                foreach my $usedBranch (@$pathRef) {
                    if ($usedBranch == $branch) {
                        next BRANCH;
                    }
                }
                if (scalar @$lettersRef == $index + 1) {
                    return 1; # End of word and success.
                }
                push @$pathRef, $branch;
                if (traverse($lettersRef, $pathRef)) {
                    return 1; # Recursive success.
                }
                else {
                    pop @$pathRef;
                }
            }
        }
    return 0; # No path found. Failed.
}