所以我想添加另一种PHP方法来解决这个问题，因为每个人都喜欢PHP。 我想做一点重构，比如对字典文件使用regexpression匹配，但现在我只是将整个字典文件加载到一个wordList中。

我使用了链表的思想。每个Node都有一个字符值、一个位置值和一个next指针。

location值是我发现两个节点是否连接的方法。

1     2     3     4
11    12    13    14
21    22    23    24
31    32    33    34

所以使用这个网格，如果第一个节点的位置等于第二个节点的位置+/- 1(同一行)，+/- 9,10,11(上下一行)，我就知道两个节点是连接的。

我使用递归进行主搜索。它从wordList中取出一个单词，找到所有可能的起点，然后递归地找到下一个可能的连接，记住它不能去到它已经使用的位置(这就是为什么我添加$notInLoc)。

无论如何，我知道它需要一些重构，并且希望听到关于如何使它更干净的想法，但是它根据我使用的字典文件产生了正确的结果。根据黑板上元音和组合的数量，大约需要3到6秒。我知道，一旦我对字典结果进行预匹配，这将显著减少。

<?php
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_depth', 20);
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_children', 1024);
    ini_set('xdebug.var_display_max_data', 1024);

    class Node {
        var $loc;

        function __construct($value) {
            $this->value = $value;
            $next = null;
        }
    }

    class Boggle {
        var $root;
        var $locList = array (1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32, 33, 34);
        var $wordList = [];
        var $foundWords = [];

        function __construct($board) {
            // Takes in a board string and creates all the nodes
            $node = new Node($board[0]);
            $node->loc = $this->locList[0];
            $this->root = $node;
            for ($i = 1; $i < strlen($board); $i++) {
                    $node->next = new Node($board[$i]);
                    $node->next->loc = $this->locList[$i];
                    $node = $node->next;
            }
            // Load in a dictionary file
            // Use regexp to elimate all the words that could never appear and load the 
            // rest of the words into wordList
            $handle = fopen("dict.txt", "r");
            if ($handle) {
                while (($line = fgets($handle)) !== false) {
                    // process the line read.
                    $line = trim($line);
                    if (strlen($line) > 2) {
                        $this->wordList[] = trim($line);
                    }
                }
                fclose($handle);
            } else {
                // error opening the file.
                echo "Problem with the file.";
            } 
        }

        function isConnected($node1, $node2) {
        // Determines if 2 nodes are connected on the boggle board

            return (($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 1) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 1) ||
               ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 9) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 10) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc - 11) ||
               ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 9) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 10) || ($node1->loc == $node2->loc + 11)) ? true : false;

        }

        function find($value, $notInLoc = []) {
            // Returns a node with the value that isn't in a location
            $current = $this->root;
            while($current) {
                if ($current->value == $value && !in_array($current->loc, $notInLoc)) {
                    return $current;
                }
                if (isset($current->next)) {
                    $current = $current->next;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findAll($value) {
            // Returns an array of nodes with a specific value
            $current = $this->root;
            $foundNodes = [];
            while ($current) {
                if ($current->value == $value) {
                    $foundNodes[] = $current;
                }
                if (isset($current->next)) {
                    $current = $current->next;
                } else {
                    break;
                }
            }
            return (empty($foundNodes)) ? false : $foundNodes;
        }

        function findAllConnectedTo($node, $value, $notInLoc = []) {
            // Returns an array of nodes that are connected to a specific node and 
            // contain a specific value and are not in a certain location
            $nodeList = $this->findAll($value);
            $newList = [];
            if ($nodeList) {
                foreach ($nodeList as $node2) {
                    if (!in_array($node2->loc, $notInLoc) && $this->isConnected($node, $node2)) {
                        $newList[] = $node2;
                    }
                }
            }
            return (empty($newList)) ? false : $newList;
        }



        function inner($word, $list, $i = 0, $notInLoc = []) {
            $i++;
            foreach($list as $node) {
                $notInLoc[] = $node->loc;
                if ($list2 = $this->findAllConnectedTo($node, $word[$i], $notInLoc)) {
                    if ($i == (strlen($word) - 1)) {
                        return true;
                    } else {
                        return $this->inner($word, $list2, $i, $notInLoc);
                    }
                }
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findWord($word) {
            if ($list = $this->findAll($word[0])) {
                return $this->inner($word, $list);
            }
            return false;
        }

        function findAllWords() {
            foreach($this->wordList as $word) {
                if ($this->findWord($word)) {
                    $this->foundWords[] = $word;
                }
            }
        }

        function displayBoard() {
            $current = $this->root;
            for ($i=0; $i < 4; $i++) {
                echo $current->value . " " . $current->next->value . " " . $current->next->next->value . " " . $current->next->next->next->value . "<br />";
                if ($i < 3) {
                    $current = $current->next->next->next->next;
                }
            }
        }

    }

    function randomBoardString() {
        return substr(str_shuffle(str_repeat("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz", 16)), 0, 16);
    }

    $myBoggle = new Boggle(randomBoardString());
    $myBoggle->displayBoard();
    $x = microtime(true);
    $myBoggle->findAllWords();
    $y = microtime(true);
    echo ($y-$x);
    var_dump($myBoggle->foundWords);

    ?>

当我看到问题陈述时，我想到了“Trie”。但看到其他一些海报使用了这种方法，我寻找另一种不同的方法。可惜的是，Trie方法表现更好。我在我的机器上运行了Kent的Perl解决方案，在调整它以使用我的字典文件后，它花了0.31秒运行。我自己的perl实现需要0.54秒才能运行。

这就是我的方法:

Create a transition hash to model the legal transitions. Iterate through all 16^3 possible three letter combinations. In the loop, exclude illegal transitions and repeat visits to the same square. Form all the legal 3-letter sequences and store them in a hash. Then loop through all words in the dictionary. Exclude words that are too long or short Slide a 3-letter window across each word and see if it is among the 3-letter combos from step 2. Exclude words that fail. This eliminates most non-matches. If still not eliminated, use a recursive algorithm to see if the word can be formed by making paths through the puzzle. (This part is slow, but called infrequently.) Print out the words I found. I tried 3-letter and 4-letter sequences, but 4-letter sequences slowed the program down.

在我的代码中，我使用/usr/share/dict/words作为我的字典。它是MAC OS X和许多Unix系统的标准配置。如果你愿意，你可以使用另一个文件。要破解不同的谜题，只需更改变量@puzzle。这将很容易适应更大的矩阵。你只需要改变%transitions哈希值和%legalTransitions哈希值。

这种解决方案的优点是代码短，数据结构简单。

下面是Perl代码(我知道它使用了太多的全局变量):

#!/usr/bin/perl
use Time::HiRes  qw{ time };

sub readFile($);
sub findAllPrefixes($);
sub isWordTraceable($);
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@);

my $startTime = time;

# Puzzle to solve

my @puzzle = ( 
    F, X, I, E,
    A, M, L, O,
    E, W, B, X,
    A, S, T, U
);

my $minimumWordLength = 3;
my $maximumPrefixLength = 3; # I tried four and it slowed down.

# Slurp the word list.
my $wordlistFile = "/usr/share/dict/words";

my @words = split(/\n/, uc(readFile($wordlistFile)));
print "Words loaded from word list: " . scalar @words . "\n";

print "Word file load time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";
my $postLoad = time;

# Define the legal transitions from one letter position to another. 
# Positions are numbered 0-15.
#     0  1  2  3
#     4  5  6  7
#     8  9 10 11
#    12 13 14 15
my %transitions = ( 
   -1 => [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15],
    0 => [1,4,5], 
    1 => [0,2,4,5,6],
    2 => [1,3,5,6,7],
    3 => [2,6,7],
    4 => [0,1,5,8,9],
    5 => [0,1,2,4,6,8,9,10],
    6 => [1,2,3,5,7,9,10,11],
    7 => [2,3,6,10,11],
    8 => [4,5,9,12,13],
    9 => [4,5,6,8,10,12,13,14],
    10 => [5,6,7,9,11,13,14,15],
    11 => [6,7,10,14,15],
    12 => [8,9,13],
    13 => [8,9,10,12,14],
    14 => [9,10,11,13,15],
    15 => [10,11,14]
);

# Convert the transition matrix into a hash for easy access.
my %legalTransitions = ();
foreach my $start (keys %transitions) {
    my $legalRef = $transitions{$start};
    foreach my $stop (@$legalRef) {
        my $index = ($start + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($stop + 1);
        $legalTransitions{$index} = 1;
    }
}

my %prefixesInPuzzle = findAllPrefixes($maximumPrefixLength);

print "Find prefixes time: " . (time - $postLoad) . "\n";
my $postPrefix = time;

my @wordsFoundInPuzzle = findWordsInPuzzle(@words);

print "Find words in puzzle time: " . (time - $postPrefix) . "\n";

print "Unique prefixes found: " . (scalar keys %prefixesInPuzzle) . "\n";
print "Words found (" . (scalar @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . ") :\n    " . join("\n    ", @wordsFoundInPuzzle) . "\n";

print "Total Elapsed time: " . (time - $startTime) . "\n";

###########################################

sub readFile($) {
    my ($filename) = @_;
    my $contents;
    if (-e $filename) {
        # This is magic: it opens and reads a file into a scalar in one line of code. 
        # See http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2003/11/21/slurp.html
        $contents = do { local( @ARGV, $/ ) = $filename ; <> } ; 
    }
    else {
        $contents = '';
    }
    return $contents;
}

# Is it legal to move from the first position to the second? They must be adjacent.
sub isLegalTransition($$) {
    my ($pos1,$pos2) = @_;
    my $index = ($pos1 + 1) * (scalar @puzzle) + ($pos2 + 1);
    return $legalTransitions{$index};
}

# Find all prefixes where $minimumWordLength <= length <= $maxPrefixLength
#
#   $maxPrefixLength ... Maximum length of prefix we will store. Three gives best performance. 
sub findAllPrefixes($) {
    my ($maxPrefixLength) = @_;
    my %prefixes = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;

    # Every possible N-letter combination of the letters in the puzzle 
    # can be represented as an integer, though many of those combinations
    # involve illegal transitions, duplicated letters, etc.
    # Iterate through all those possibilities and eliminate the illegal ones.
    my $maxIndex = $puzzleSize ** $maxPrefixLength;

    for (my $i = 0; $i < $maxIndex; $i++) {
        my @path;
        my $remainder = $i;
        my $prevPosition = -1;
        my $prefix = '';
        my %usedPositions = ();
        for (my $prefixLength = 1; $prefixLength <= $maxPrefixLength; $prefixLength++) {
            my $position = $remainder % $puzzleSize;

            # Is this a valid step?
            #  a. Is the transition legal (to an adjacent square)?
            if (! isLegalTransition($prevPosition, $position)) {
                last;
            }

            #  b. Have we repeated a square?
            if ($usedPositions{$position}) {
                last;
            }
            else {
                $usedPositions{$position} = 1;
            }

            # Record this prefix if length >= $minimumWordLength.
            $prefix .= $puzzle[$position];
            if ($prefixLength >= $minimumWordLength) {
                $prefixes{$prefix} = 1;
            }

            push @path, $position;
            $remainder -= $position;
            $remainder /= $puzzleSize;
            $prevPosition = $position;
        } # end inner for
    } # end outer for
    return %prefixes;
}

# Loop through all words in dictionary, looking for ones that are in the puzzle.
sub findWordsInPuzzle(@) {
    my @allWords = @_;
    my @wordsFound = ();
    my $puzzleSize = scalar @puzzle;
WORD: foreach my $word (@allWords) {
        my $wordLength = length($word);
        if ($wordLength > $puzzleSize || $wordLength < $minimumWordLength) {
            # Reject word as too short or too long.
        }
        elsif ($wordLength <= $maximumPrefixLength ) {
            # Word should be in the prefix hash.
            if ($prefixesInPuzzle{$word}) {
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }
        else {
            # Scan through the word using a window of length $maximumPrefixLength, looking for any strings not in our prefix list.
            # If any are found that are not in the list, this word is not possible.
            # If no non-matches are found, we have more work to do.
            my $limit = $wordLength - $maximumPrefixLength + 1;
            for (my $startIndex = 0; $startIndex < $limit; $startIndex ++) {
                if (! $prefixesInPuzzle{substr($word, $startIndex, $maximumPrefixLength)}) {
                    next WORD;
                }
            }
            if (isWordTraceable($word)) {
                # Additional test necessary: see if we can form this word by following legal transitions
                push @wordsFound, $word;
            }
        }

    }
    return @wordsFound;
}

# Is it possible to trace out the word using only legal transitions?
sub isWordTraceable($) {
    my $word = shift;
    return traverse([split(//, $word)], [-1]); # Start at special square -1, which may transition to any square in the puzzle.
}

# Recursively look for a path through the puzzle that matches the word.
sub traverse($$) {
    my ($lettersRef, $pathRef) = @_;
    my $index = scalar @$pathRef - 1;
    my $position = $pathRef->[$index];
    my $letter = $lettersRef->[$index];
    my $branchesRef =  $transitions{$position};
BRANCH: foreach my $branch (@$branchesRef) {
            if ($puzzle[$branch] eq $letter) {
                # Have we used this position yet?
                foreach my $usedBranch (@$pathRef) {
                    if ($usedBranch == $branch) {
                        next BRANCH;
                    }
                }
                if (scalar @$lettersRef == $index + 1) {
                    return 1; # End of word and success.
                }
                push @$pathRef, $branch;
                if (traverse($lettersRef, $pathRef)) {
                    return 1; # Recursive success.
                }
                else {
                    pop @$pathRef;
                }
            }
        }
    return 0; # No path found. Failed.
}

import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * @author Sujeet Kumar (mrsujeet@gmail.com) It prints out all strings that can
 *         be formed by moving left, right, up, down, or diagonally and exist in
 *         a given dictionary , without repeating any cell. Assumes words are
 *         comprised of lower case letters. Currently prints words as many times
 *         as they appear, not just once. *
 */

public class BoggleGame 
{
  /* A sample 4X4 board/2D matrix */
  private static char[][] board = { { 's', 'a', 's', 'g' },
                                  { 'a', 'u', 't', 'h' }, 
                                  { 'r', 't', 'j', 'e' },
                                  { 'k', 'a', 'h', 'e' }
};

/* A sample dictionary which contains unique collection of words */
private static Set<String> dictionary = new HashSet<String>();

private static boolean[][] visited = new boolean[board.length][board[0].length];

public static void main(String[] arg) {
    dictionary.add("sujeet");
    dictionary.add("sarthak");
    findWords();

}

// show all words, starting from each possible starting place
private static void findWords() {
    for (int i = 0; i < board.length; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < board[i].length; j++) {
            StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
            dfs(i, j, buffer);
        }

    }

}

// run depth first search starting at cell (i, j)
private static void dfs(int i, int j, StringBuffer buffer) {
    /*
     * base case: just return in recursive call when index goes out of the
     * size of matrix dimension
     */
    if (i < 0 || j < 0 || i > board.length - 1 || j > board[i].length - 1) {
        return;
    }

    /*
     * base case: to return in recursive call when given cell is already
     * visited in a given string of word
     */
    if (visited[i][j] == true) { // can't visit a cell more than once
        return;
    }

    // not to allow a cell to reuse
    visited[i][j] = true;

    // combining cell character with other visited cells characters to form
    // word a potential word which may exist in dictionary
    buffer.append(board[i][j]);

    // found a word in dictionary. Print it.
    if (dictionary.contains(buffer.toString())) {
        System.out.println(buffer);
    }

    /*
     * consider all neighbors.For a given cell considering all adjacent
     * cells in horizontal, vertical and diagonal direction
     */
    for (int k = i - 1; k <= i + 1; k++) {
        for (int l = j - 1; l <= j + 1; l++) {
            dfs(k, l, buffer);

        }

    }
    buffer.deleteCharAt(buffer.length() - 1);
    visited[i][j] = false;
  }
}

如何简单的排序和使用字典中的二进制搜索?

在0.35秒内返回整个列表，并可以进一步优化(例如删除含有未使用字母的单词等)。

from bisect import bisect_left

f = open("dict.txt")
D.extend([line.strip() for line in f.readlines()])
D = sorted(D)

def neibs(M,x,y):
    n = len(M)
    for i in xrange(-1,2):
        for j in xrange(-1,2):
            if (i == 0 and j == 0) or (x + i < 0 or x + i >= n or y + j < 0 or y + j >= n):
                continue
            yield (x + i, y + j)

def findWords(M,D,x,y,prefix):
    prefix = prefix + M[x][y]

    # find word in dict by binary search
    found = bisect_left(D,prefix)

    # if found then yield
    if D[found] == prefix: 
        yield prefix

    # if what we found is not even a prefix then return
    # (there is no point in going further)
    if len(D[found]) < len(prefix) or D[found][:len(prefix)] != prefix:
        return

    # recourse
    for neib in neibs(M,x,y):
        for word in findWords(M,D,neib[0], neib[1], prefix):
            yield word

def solve(M,D):
    # check each starting point
    for x in xrange(0,len(M)):
        for y in xrange(0,len(M)):
            for word in findWords(M,D,x,y,""):
                yield word

grid = "fxie amlo ewbx astu".split()
print [x for x in solve(grid,D)]

你可以把这个问题分成两部分:

某种搜索算法可以在网格中列举出可能的字符串。 一种测试字符串是否是有效单词的方法。

理想情况下，(2)还应该包括一种测试字符串是否是有效单词前缀的方法——这将允许您精简搜索并节省大量时间。

亚当·罗森菲尔德(Adam Rosenfield)的Trie是(2)的一个解决方案。它很优雅，可能是算法专家的首选，但有了现代语言和现代计算机，我们可能会更懒一点。此外，正如Kent所建议的，我们可以通过丢弃网格中没有字母的单词来减少字典的大小。这是一些蟒蛇:

def make_lookups(grid, fn='dict.txt'):
    # Make set of valid characters.
    chars = set()
    for word in grid:
        chars.update(word)

    words = set(x.strip() for x in open(fn) if set(x.strip()) <= chars)
    prefixes = set()
    for w in words:
        for i in range(len(w)+1):
            prefixes.add(w[:i])

    return words, prefixes

哇;常数时间前缀测试。加载你链接的字典需要几秒钟，但只有几秒钟:-)(注意words <= prefixes)

现在，对于第(1)部分，我倾向于用图表来思考。所以我将创建一个像这样的字典:

graph = { (x, y):set([(x0,y0), (x1,y1), (x2,y2)]), }

例如，graph[(x, y)]是你从位置(x, y)可以到达的坐标集。我还将添加一个虚拟节点None，它将连接到所有东西。

构建它有点笨拙，因为有8个可能的位置，你必须做边界检查。下面是一些相应笨拙的python代码:

def make_graph(grid):
    root = None
    graph = { root:set() }
    chardict = { root:'' }

    for i, row in enumerate(grid):
        for j, char in enumerate(row):
            chardict[(i, j)] = char
            node = (i, j)
            children = set()
            graph[node] = children
            graph[root].add(node)
            add_children(node, children, grid)

    return graph, chardict

def add_children(node, children, grid):
    x0, y0 = node
    for i in [-1,0,1]:
        x = x0 + i
        if not (0 <= x < len(grid)):
            continue
        for j in [-1,0,1]:
            y = y0 + j
            if not (0 <= y < len(grid[0])) or (i == j == 0):
                continue

            children.add((x,y))

这段代码还建立了一个字典映射(x,y)到相应的字符。这让我把一个位置列表转换成一个单词:

def to_word(chardict, pos_list):
    return ''.join(chardict[x] for x in pos_list)

最后，我们进行深度优先搜索。基本程序是:

搜索到达一个特定的节点。 检查到目前为止的路径是否可能是单词的一部分。如果不是，就不要进一步探索这个分支。 检查到目前为止的路径是否是一个单词。如果是，则添加到结果列表中。 探索迄今为止所有孩子未走的路。

Python:

def find_words(graph, chardict, position, prefix, results, words, prefixes):
    """ Arguments:
      graph :: mapping (x,y) to set of reachable positions
      chardict :: mapping (x,y) to character
      position :: current position (x,y) -- equals prefix[-1]
      prefix :: list of positions in current string
      results :: set of words found
      words :: set of valid words in the dictionary
      prefixes :: set of valid words or prefixes thereof
    """
    word = to_word(chardict, prefix)

    if word not in prefixes:
        return

    if word in words:
        results.add(word)

    for child in graph[position]:
        if child not in prefix:
            find_words(graph, chardict, child, prefix+[child], results, words, prefixes)

运行代码如下:

grid = ['fxie', 'amlo', 'ewbx', 'astu']
g, c = make_graph(grid)
w, p = make_lookups(grid)
res = set()
find_words(g, c, None, [], res, w, p)

检查保留区，看看答案。下面是为你的例子找到的单词列表，按大小排序:

 ['a', 'b', 'e', 'f', 'i', 'l', 'm', 'o', 's', 't',
 'u', 'w', 'x', 'ae', 'am', 'as', 'aw', 'ax', 'bo',
 'bu', 'ea', 'el', 'em', 'es', 'fa', 'ie', 'io', 'li',
 'lo', 'ma', 'me', 'mi', 'oe', 'ox', 'sa', 'se', 'st',
 'tu', 'ut', 'wa', 'we', 'xi', 'aes', 'ame', 'ami',
 'ase', 'ast', 'awa', 'awe', 'awl', 'blo', 'but', 'elb',
 'elm', 'fae', 'fam', 'lei', 'lie', 'lim', 'lob', 'lox',
 'mae', 'maw', 'mew', 'mil', 'mix', 'oil', 'olm', 'saw',
 'sea', 'sew', 'swa', 'tub', 'tux', 'twa', 'wae', 'was',
 'wax', 'wem', 'ambo', 'amil', 'amli', 'asem', 'axil',
 'axle', 'bleo', 'boil', 'bole', 'east', 'fame', 'limb',
 'lime', 'mesa', 'mewl', 'mile', 'milo', 'oime', 'sawt',
 'seam', 'seax', 'semi', 'stub', 'swam', 'twae', 'twas',
 'wame', 'wase', 'wast', 'weam', 'west', 'amble', 'awest',
 'axile', 'embox', 'limbo', 'limes', 'swami', 'embole',
 'famble', 'semble', 'wamble']

代码需要(字面上的)几秒钟来加载字典，但其余的在我的机器上是立即完成的。

我花了3个月的时间致力于解决10个最佳点密集的5x5 Boggle板问题。

这个问题现在已经解决了，并在5个网页上进行了全面披露。有问题请联系我。

该棋盘分析算法使用显式堆栈，通过具有直接子信息的有向无环词图伪递归遍历棋盘方格，并使用时间戳跟踪机制。这很可能是世界上最先进的词汇数据结构。

该方案在四核上每秒评估大约10,000块非常好的电路板。(9500 +分)

父网页:

DeepSearch.c - http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/deep.html

组件网页:

最佳记分牌- http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/binary.html

高级词汇结构- http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/adtdawg.html

板分析算法- http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/guns.html

并行批处理- http://www.pathcom.com/~vadco/parallel.html

- 只有追求最好的人才会对这本全面的著作感兴趣。