I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way too slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

为dict寻找一个简单的包装器类，支持属性样式的键访问/赋值(点表示法)，我对现有选项不满意，原因如下。

数据类、pydantic等都很棒，但需要对内容进行静态定义。此外，它们不能在依赖dict的代码中替换dict，因为它们不共享相同的方法，并且不支持__getitem__()语法。

因此，我开发了MetaDict。它的行为完全类似于dict，但支持点表示法和IDE自动补全(如果对象被加载到RAM中)，而没有其他解决方案的缺点和潜在的名称空间冲突。所有功能和使用示例都可以在GitHub上找到(见上面的链接)。

完全披露:我是MetaDict的作者。

我在尝试其他解决方案时遇到的缺点/限制:

Addict No key autocompletion in IDE Nested key assignment cannot be turned off Newly assigned dict objects are not converted to support attribute-style key access Shadows inbuilt type Dict Prodict No key autocompletion in IDE without defining a static schema (similar to dataclass) No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables AttrDict No key autocompletion in IDE Converts list objects to tuple behind the scenes Munch Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables EasyDict Only strings are valid keys, but dict accepts all hashable objects as keys Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] Inbuilt methods don't behave as expected: obj.pop('unknown_key', None) raises an AttributeError

注意:我在这个stackoverflow中写了一个类似的答案，这是相关的。

如果你想访问dict键作为一个对象(或作为一个dict难键)，做递归，也能够更新原来的dict，你可以这样做:

class Dictate(object):
    """Object view of a dict, updating the passed in dict when values are set
    or deleted. "Dictate" the contents of a dict...: """

    def __init__(self, d):
        # since __setattr__ is overridden, self.__dict = d doesn't work
        object.__setattr__(self, '_Dictate__dict', d)

    # Dictionary-like access / updates
    def __getitem__(self, name):
        value = self.__dict[name]
        if isinstance(value, dict):  # recursively view sub-dicts as objects
            value = Dictate(value)
        return value

    def __setitem__(self, name, value):
        self.__dict[name] = value
    def __delitem__(self, name):
        del self.__dict[name]

    # Object-like access / updates
    def __getattr__(self, name):
        return self[name]

    def __setattr__(self, name, value):
        self[name] = value
    def __delattr__(self, name):
        del self[name]

    def __repr__(self):
        return "%s(%r)" % (type(self).__name__, self.__dict)
    def __str__(self):
        return str(self.__dict)

使用示例:

d = {'a': 'b', 1: 2}
dd = Dictate(d)
assert dd.a == 'b'  # Access like an object
assert dd[1] == 2  # Access like a dict
# Updates affect d
dd.c = 'd'
assert d['c'] == 'd'
del dd.a
del dd[1]
# Inner dicts are mapped
dd.e = {}
dd.e.f = 'g'
assert dd['e'].f == 'g'
assert d == {'c': 'd', 'e': {'f': 'g'}}

通过PyPI包attrdict可以很容易地得到问题的精确解。关于这个包的一个有趣的事实是，字典可以作为键或属性访问。这就是解决方案

from attrdict import AttrDict

d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ["hi", {'foo': "bar"}]}

x = AttrDict(d)

print(x.a, x['a'])
print(x.b.c, x['b']['c'])
print(x.d[1].foo, x['d'][1]['foo'])

输出如下(显然没有错误)-

1 1
2 2
bar bar

注意:它于2019年2月2日首次发布，这意味着在提出这个问题时，这个第三方pypi包还不存在。但是如果有人现在想通过键或属性访问dict值，这个包肯定可以像魔术一样帮助你，只需要一行代码。

这是另一个实现:

class DictObj(object):
    def __init__(self, d):
        self.__dict__ = d

def dict_to_obj(d):
    if isinstance(d, (list, tuple)): return map(dict_to_obj, d)
    elif not isinstance(d, dict): return d
    return DictObj(dict((k, dict_to_obj(v)) for (k,v) in d.iteritems()))

[编辑]遗漏了在列表中处理字典的部分，而不仅仅是其他字典。添加修复。

下面是执行SilentGhost最初建议的另一种方法:

def dict2obj(d):
  if isinstance(d, dict):
    n = {}
    for item in d:
      if isinstance(d[item], dict):
        n[item] = dict2obj(d[item])
      elif isinstance(d[item], (list, tuple)):
        n[item] = [dict2obj(elem) for elem in d[item]]
      else:
        n[item] = d[item]
    return type('obj_from_dict', (object,), n)
  else:
    return d