这是c++ 17中另一种实现方法(灵感来自boost:hana)。

该解决方案不需要has_something<T> SFINAE类型trait类。

解决方案

////////////////////////////////////////////
// has_member implementation
////////////////////////////////////////////

#include <type_traits>

template<typename T, typename F>
constexpr auto has_member_impl(F&& f) -> decltype(f(std::declval<T>()), true)
{
  return true;
}

template<typename>
constexpr bool has_member_impl(...) { return false; }

#define has_member(T, EXPR) \
 has_member_impl<T>( [](auto&& obj)->decltype(obj.EXPR){} )

Test

////////////////////////////////////////////
// Test
////////////////////////////////////////////

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

struct Example {
    int Foo;
    void Bar() {}
    std::string toString() { return "Hello from Example::toString()!"; }
};

struct Example2 {
    int X;
};

template<class T>
std::string optionalToString(T* obj)
{
    if constexpr(has_member(T, toString()))
        return obj->toString();
    else
        return "toString not defined";
}

int main() {
    static_assert(has_member(Example, Foo), 
                  "Example class must have Foo member");
    static_assert(has_member(Example, Bar()), 
                  "Example class must have Bar() member function");
    static_assert(!has_member(Example, ZFoo), 
                  "Example class must not have ZFoo member.");
    static_assert(!has_member(Example, ZBar()), 
                  "Example class must not have ZBar() member function");

    Example e1;
    Example2 e2;

    std::cout << "e1: " << optionalToString(&e1) << "\n";
    std::cout << "e1: " << optionalToString(&e2) << "\n";
}

一个使用SFINAE和模板部分特化的例子，通过编写Has_foo概念检查:

#include <type_traits>
struct A{};

struct B{ int foo(int a, int b);};

struct C{void foo(int a, int b);};

struct D{int foo();};

struct E: public B{};

// available in C++17 onwards as part of <type_traits>
template<typename...>
using void_t = void;

template<typename T, typename = void> struct Has_foo: std::false_type{};

template<typename T> 
struct Has_foo<T, void_t<
    std::enable_if_t<
        std::is_same<
            int, 
            decltype(std::declval<T>().foo((int)0, (int)0))
        >::value
    >
>>: std::true_type{};


static_assert(not Has_foo<A>::value, "A does not have a foo");
static_assert(Has_foo<B>::value, "B has a foo");
static_assert(not Has_foo<C>::value, "C has a foo with the wrong return. ");
static_assert(not Has_foo<D>::value, "D has a foo with the wrong arguments. ");
static_assert(Has_foo<E>::value, "E has a foo since it inherits from B");

这是我在c++ 20中发现的最简洁的方法，非常接近你的问题:

template<class T>
std::string optionalToString(T* obj)
{
  if constexpr (requires { obj->toString(); })
    return obj->toString();
  else
    return "toString not defined";
}

在godbolt上观看:https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/5jb1d93Ms

MSVC有__if_exists和__if_not_exists关键字(Doc)。连同Nicola的typef - sfinae方法，我可以创建一个检查GCC和MSVC，就像OP所寻找的那样。

更新:来源可以在这里找到

我一直在寻找一个方法，允许以某种方式不绑定结构名has_member类的成员的名字。 实际上，如果lambda可以被允许在未求值的表达式中(这是被标准禁止的)，这将更简单，即has_member<ClassName, SOME_MACRO_WITH_DECLTYPE(member_name)>

#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <type_traits>

#define LAMBDA_FOR_MEMBER_NAME(NAME) [](auto object_instance) -> decltype(&(decltype(object_instance)::NAME)) {}

template<typename T>
struct TypeGetter
{
    constexpr TypeGetter() = default;
    constexpr TypeGetter(T) {}
    using type = T;

    constexpr auto getValue()
    {
        return std::declval<type>();
    }
};

template<typename T, typename LambdaExpressionT>
struct has_member {
    using lambda_prototype = LambdaExpressionT;

    //SFINAE
    template<class ValueT, class = void>
    struct is_void_t_deducable : std::false_type {};

    template<class ValueT>
    struct is_void_t_deducable<ValueT,
        std::void_t<decltype(std::declval<lambda_prototype>()(std::declval<ValueT>()))>> : std::true_type {};

    static constexpr bool value = is_void_t_deducable<T>::value;
};

struct SimpleClass
{
    int field;
    void method() {}
};

int main(void)
{   
    const auto helpful_lambda = LAMBDA_FOR_MEMBER_NAME(field);
    using member_field = decltype(helpful_lambda);
    std::cout << has_member<SimpleClass, member_field>::value;

    const auto lambda = LAMBDA_FOR_MEMBER_NAME(method);
    using member_method = decltype(lambda);
    std::cout << has_member<SimpleClass, member_method>::value;
    
}

我也遇到过类似的问题:

一个模板类，可以从少数基类派生，其中一些基类具有某个成员，而另一些基类没有。

我解决它类似于“typeof”(Nicola Bonelli)的答案，但使用decltype，所以它在MSVS上编译和正确运行:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

struct Generic {};    
struct HasMember 
{
  HasMember() : _a(1) {};
  int _a;
};    

// SFINAE test
template <typename T>
class S : public T
{
public:
  std::string foo (std::string b)
  {
    return foo2<T>(b,0);
  }

protected:
  template <typename T> std::string foo2 (std::string b, decltype (T::_a))
  {
    return b + std::to_string(T::_a);
  }
  template <typename T> std::string foo2 (std::string b, ...)
  {
    return b + "No";
  }
};

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
  S<HasMember> d1;
  S<Generic> d2;

  std::cout << d1.foo("HasMember: ") << std::endl;
  std::cout << d2.foo("Generic: ") << std::endl;
  return 0;
}