I'm currently managing a MySQL database on Amazon's cloud infrastructure that has grown to 160 GB. Query performance is fine. What has become a nightmare is backups, restores, adding slaves, or anything else that deals with the whole dataset, or even DDL on large tables. Getting a clean import of a dump file has become problematic. In order to make the process stable enough to automate, various choices needed to be made to prioritize stability over performance. If we ever had to recover from a disaster using a SQL backup, we'd be down for days.

Horizontally scaling SQL is also pretty painful, and in most cases leads to using it in ways you probably did not intend when you chose to put your data in SQL in the first place. Shards, read slaves, multi-master, et al, they are all really shitty solutions that add complexity to everything you ever do with the DB, and not one of them solves the problem; only mitigates it in some ways. I would strongly suggest looking at moving some of your data out of MySQL (or really any SQL) when you start approaching a dataset of a size where these types of things become an issue.

更新:几年后，我们的数据集已经增长到大约800 GiB。此外，我们还有一个200+ GiB的表和其他一些50-100 GiB的表。我之前说的都成立。它的性能仍然很好，但运行完整数据集操作的问题变得更糟了。

还有一点需要考虑的是系统和数据在日常生活中的用途。

例如，对于一个用GPS监控汽车的系统来说，查询汽车前几个月的位置数据是不相关的。

因此，可以将数据传递给其他历史表，以便进行可能的查询，并减少日常查询的执行次数。

数据库大小确实与字节数和表的行数有关。您将注意到light数据库和blob填充数据库之间的巨大性能差异。有一次我的应用程序卡住了，因为我把二进制图像放在字段中，而不是把图像保存在磁盘上的文件中，只把文件名放在数据库中。另一方面，迭代大量的行并不是免费的。

2GB和约15M条记录是一个非常小的数据库-我在奔腾III上运行过更大的数据库(!)，一切仍然运行得非常快。如果你的慢，那是数据库/应用程序设计的问题，而不是mysql的问题。

The database size does matter. If you have more than one table with more than a million records, then performance starts indeed to degrade. The number of records does of course affect the performance: MySQL can be slow with large tables. If you hit one million records you will get performance problems if the indices are not set right (for example no indices for fields in "WHERE statements" or "ON conditions" in joins). If you hit 10 million records, you will start to get performance problems even if you have all your indices right. Hardware upgrades - adding more memory and more processor power, especially memory - often help to reduce the most severe problems by increasing the performance again, at least to a certain degree. For example 37 signals went from 32 GB RAM to 128GB of RAM for the Basecamp database server.

物理数据库大小无关紧要。记录的数量并不重要。

In my experience the biggest problem that you are going to run in to is not size, but the number of queries you can handle at a time. Most likely you are going to have to move to a master/slave configuration so that the read queries can run against the slaves and the write queries run against the master. However if you are not ready for this yet, you can always tweak your indexes for the queries you are running to speed up the response times. Also there is a lot of tweaking you can do to the network stack and kernel in Linux that will help.

我的内存达到了10GB，只有中等数量的连接，它处理请求还不错。

我将首先关注您的索引，然后让服务器管理员查看您的操作系统，如果所有这些都没有帮助，那么可能是时候实现主/从配置了。