我使用std::queue实现JobQueue类。(基本上这个类以FIFO方式处理每个作业)。 在一个场景中,我希望一次性清除队列(从队列中删除所有作业)。 我在std::queue类中没有看到任何可用的清除方法。

如何有效地实现JobQueue类的清除方法?

我有一个简单的解决方案弹出在一个循环,但我正在寻找更好的方法。

//Clears the job queue
void JobQueue ::clearJobs()
 {
  // I want to avoid pop in a loop
    while (!m_Queue.empty())
    {
        m_Queue.pop();
    }
}

当前回答

Author of the topic asked how to clear the queue "efficiently", so I assume he wants better complexity than linear O(queue size). Methods served by David Rodriguez, anon have the same complexity: according to STL reference, operator = has complexity O(queue size). IMHO it's because each element of queue is reserved separately and it isn't allocated in one big memory block, like in vector. So to clear all memory, we have to delete every element separately. So the straightest way to clear std::queue is one line:

while(!Q.empty()) Q.pop();

其他回答

是的-有点队列类的错误特征,恕我直言。这就是我所做的:

#include <queue>
using namespace std;;

int main() {
    queue <int> q1;
    // stuff
    q1 = queue<int>();  
}

Author of the topic asked how to clear the queue "efficiently", so I assume he wants better complexity than linear O(queue size). Methods served by David Rodriguez, anon have the same complexity: according to STL reference, operator = has complexity O(queue size). IMHO it's because each element of queue is reserved separately and it isn't allocated in one big memory block, like in vector. So to clear all memory, we have to delete every element separately. So the straightest way to clear std::queue is one line:

while(!Q.empty()) Q.pop();

假设你的m_Queue包含整数:

std::queue<int>().swap(m_Queue)

否则,如果它包含例如指向Job对象的指针,则:

std::queue<Job*>().swap(m_Queue)

这样你就用你的m_Queue交换了一个空队列,这样m_Queue就变成了空队列。

使用unique_ptr也可以。 然后重置它以获得一个空队列并释放第一个队列的内存。 至于复杂性呢?我不确定,但我猜是O(1)

可能的代码:

typedef queue<int> quint;

unique_ptr<quint> p(new quint);

// ...

p.reset(new quint);  // the old queue has been destroyed and you start afresh with an empty queue

您可以创建一个继承自队列的类,并直接清除底层容器。这是非常有效的。

template<class T>
class queue_clearable : public std::queue<T>
{
public:
    void clear()
    {
        c.clear();
    }
};

也许你的a实现也允许你的Queue对象(这里是JobQueue)继承std:: Queue <Job>,而不是将Queue作为成员变量。这样就可以在成员函数中直接访问c.clear()。