The two common solutions to this include making the call and catching the RuntimeBinderException, using reflection to check for the call, or serialising to a text format and parsing from there. The problem with exceptions is that they are very slow, because when one is constructed, the current call stack is serialised. Serialising to JSON or something analogous incurs a similar penalty. This leaves us with reflection but it only works if the underlying object is actually a POCO with real members on it. If it's a dynamic wrapper around a dictionary, a COM object, or an external web service, then reflection won't help.

另一种解决方案是使用IDynamicMetaObjectProvider获取DLR看到的成员名。在下面的例子中，我使用一个静态类(Dynamic)来测试Age字段并显示它。

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        dynamic x = new ExpandoObject();

        x.Name = "Damian Powell";
        x.Age = "21 (probably)";

        if (Dynamic.HasMember(x, "Age"))
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Age={0}", x.Age);
        }
    }
}

public static class Dynamic
{
    public static bool HasMember(object dynObj, string memberName)
    {
        return GetMemberNames(dynObj).Contains(memberName);
    }

    public static IEnumerable<string> GetMemberNames(object dynObj)
    {
        var metaObjProvider = dynObj as IDynamicMetaObjectProvider;

        if (null == metaObjProvider) throw new InvalidOperationException(
            "The supplied object must be a dynamic object " +
            "(i.e. it must implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider)"
        );

        var metaObj = metaObjProvider.GetMetaObject(
            Expression.Constant(metaObjProvider)
        );

        var memberNames = metaObj.GetDynamicMemberNames();

        return memberNames;
    }
}

我认为没有办法在不尝试访问动态变量的情况下发现动态变量是否有某个成员，除非你在c#编译器中重新实现动态绑定的处理方式。这可能包含很多猜测，因为根据c#规范，它是由实现定义的。

所以你应该尝试访问成员并捕获异常，如果它失败了:

dynamic myVariable = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();

try
{
    var x = myVariable.MyProperty;
    // do stuff with x
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
    //  MyProperty doesn't exist
} 

我想我应该比较一下Martijn和svick的答案……

下面的程序返回以下结果:

Testing with exception: 2430985 ticks
Testing with reflection: 155570 ticks

void Main()
{
    var random = new Random(Environment.TickCount);

    dynamic test = new Test();

    var sw = new Stopwatch();

    sw.Start();

    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        TestWithException(test, FlipCoin(random));
    }

    sw.Stop();

    Console.WriteLine("Testing with exception: " + sw.ElapsedTicks.ToString() + " ticks");

    sw.Restart();

    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        TestWithReflection(test, FlipCoin(random));
    }

    sw.Stop();

    Console.WriteLine("Testing with reflection: " + sw.ElapsedTicks.ToString() + " ticks");
}

class Test
{
    public bool Exists { get { return true; } }
}

bool FlipCoin(Random random)
{
    return random.Next(2) == 0;
}

bool TestWithException(dynamic d, bool useExisting)
{
    try
    {
        bool result = useExisting ? d.Exists : d.DoesntExist;
        return true;
    }
    catch (Exception)
    {
        return false;
    }
}

bool TestWithReflection(dynamic d, bool useExisting)
{
    Type type = d.GetType();

    return type.GetProperties().Any(p => p.Name.Equals(useExisting ? "Exists" : "DoesntExist"));
}

因此，我建议使用反射。见下文。

回应bland的评论:

比率是反射:100000次迭代的异常滴答声:

Fails 1/1: - 1:43 ticks
Fails 1/2: - 1:22 ticks
Fails 1/3: - 1:14 ticks
Fails 1/5: - 1:9 ticks
Fails 1/7: - 1:7 ticks
Fails 1/13: - 1:4 ticks
Fails 1/17: - 1:3 ticks
Fails 1/23: - 1:2 ticks
...
Fails 1/43: - 1:2 ticks
Fails 1/47: - 1:1 ticks

.．.很公平——如果你认为它失败的概率小于~1/47，那么就去找例外。

上面假设您每次都运行GetProperties()。您可以通过将每种类型的GetProperties()结果缓存到字典或类似内容中来加快该过程。如果您要反复检查同一组类型，这可能会有所帮助。

在我的例子中，我需要检查具有特定名称的方法是否存在，因此我使用了一个接口

var plugin = this.pluginFinder.GetPluginIfInstalled<IPlugin>(pluginName) as dynamic;
if (plugin != null && plugin is ICustomPluginAction)
{
    plugin.CustomPluginAction(action);
}

此外，接口可以包含的不仅仅是方法:

接口可以包含方法、属性、事件、索引器等等 这四种成员类型的组合。

来自:Interfaces (c#编程指南)

优雅，不需要陷阱异常或发挥反射…

对我来说，这是可行的:

if (IsProperty(() => DynamicObject.MyProperty))
  ; // do stuff



delegate string GetValueDelegate();

private bool IsProperty(GetValueDelegate getValueMethod)
{
    try
    {
        //we're not interesting in the return value.
        //What we need to know is whether an exception occurred or not

        var v = getValueMethod();
        return v != null;
    }
    catch (RuntimeBinderException)
    {
        return false;
    }
    catch
    {
        return true;
    }
}

也许使用反射?

dynamic myVar = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();
Type typeOfDynamic = myVar.GetType();
bool exist = typeOfDynamic.GetProperties().Where(p => p.Name.Equals("PropertyName")).Any();