如果你的用例是转换一个api响应，只携带一些字段，你可以使用这个:

var template = new { address = new { street = "" } };
var response = JsonConvert.DeserializeAnonymousType(await result.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(), template);

string street = response?.address?.street;

以防它能帮到别人:

如果GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame()方法返回一个ExpandoObject，你也可以在检查之前将其转换为dictionary。

dynamic test = new System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject();
test.foo = "bar";

if (((IDictionary<string, object>)test).ContainsKey("foo"))
{
    Console.WriteLine(test.foo);
}

下面是另一种方法:

using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq;

internal class DymanicTest
{
    public static string Json = @"{
            ""AED"": 3.672825,
            ""AFN"": 56.982875,
            ""ALL"": 110.252599,
            ""AMD"": 408.222002,
            ""ANG"": 1.78704,
            ""AOA"": 98.192249,
            ""ARS"": 8.44469
}";

    public static void Run()
    {
        dynamic dynamicObject = JObject.Parse(Json);

        foreach (JProperty variable in dynamicObject)
        {
            if (variable.Name == "AMD")
            {
                var value = variable.Value;
            }
        }
    }
}

我想我应该比较一下Martijn和svick的答案……

下面的程序返回以下结果:

Testing with exception: 2430985 ticks
Testing with reflection: 155570 ticks

void Main()
{
    var random = new Random(Environment.TickCount);

    dynamic test = new Test();

    var sw = new Stopwatch();

    sw.Start();

    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        TestWithException(test, FlipCoin(random));
    }

    sw.Stop();

    Console.WriteLine("Testing with exception: " + sw.ElapsedTicks.ToString() + " ticks");

    sw.Restart();

    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        TestWithReflection(test, FlipCoin(random));
    }

    sw.Stop();

    Console.WriteLine("Testing with reflection: " + sw.ElapsedTicks.ToString() + " ticks");
}

class Test
{
    public bool Exists { get { return true; } }
}

bool FlipCoin(Random random)
{
    return random.Next(2) == 0;
}

bool TestWithException(dynamic d, bool useExisting)
{
    try
    {
        bool result = useExisting ? d.Exists : d.DoesntExist;
        return true;
    }
    catch (Exception)
    {
        return false;
    }
}

bool TestWithReflection(dynamic d, bool useExisting)
{
    Type type = d.GetType();

    return type.GetProperties().Any(p => p.Name.Equals(useExisting ? "Exists" : "DoesntExist"));
}

因此，我建议使用反射。见下文。

回应bland的评论:

比率是反射:100000次迭代的异常滴答声:

Fails 1/1: - 1:43 ticks
Fails 1/2: - 1:22 ticks
Fails 1/3: - 1:14 ticks
Fails 1/5: - 1:9 ticks
Fails 1/7: - 1:7 ticks
Fails 1/13: - 1:4 ticks
Fails 1/17: - 1:3 ticks
Fails 1/23: - 1:2 ticks
...
Fails 1/43: - 1:2 ticks
Fails 1/47: - 1:1 ticks

.．.很公平——如果你认为它失败的概率小于~1/47，那么就去找例外。

上面假设您每次都运行GetProperties()。您可以通过将每种类型的GetProperties()结果缓存到字典或类似内容中来加快该过程。如果您要反复检查同一组类型，这可能会有所帮助。

根据@karask的回答，你可以像这样将函数包装为一个helper:

public static bool HasProperty(ExpandoObject expandoObj,
                               string name)
{
    return ((IDictionary<string, object>)expandoObj).ContainsKey(name);
}

对我来说，这是可行的:

if (IsProperty(() => DynamicObject.MyProperty))
  ; // do stuff



delegate string GetValueDelegate();

private bool IsProperty(GetValueDelegate getValueMethod)
{
    try
    {
        //we're not interesting in the return value.
        //What we need to know is whether an exception occurred or not

        var v = getValueMethod();
        return v != null;
    }
    catch (RuntimeBinderException)
    {
        return false;
    }
    catch
    {
        return true;
    }
}