我在单元测试中遇到过类似的问题。

使用SharpTestsEx可以检查属性是否存在。我使用这个测试我的控制器，因为JSON对象是动态的，有人可以更改名称，而忘记在javascript中更改它或其他东西，所以在编写控制器时测试所有属性应该增加我的安全性。

例子:

dynamic testedObject = new ExpandoObject();
testedObject.MyName = "I am a testing object";

现在，使用SharTestsEx:

Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.MyName; }).Should().NotThrow();
Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.NotExistingProperty; }).Should().Throw();

使用这个，我测试所有现有的属性使用“Should(). notthrow()”。

这可能离题了，但对某人来说可能有用。

我认为没有办法在不尝试访问动态变量的情况下发现动态变量是否有某个成员，除非你在c#编译器中重新实现动态绑定的处理方式。这可能包含很多猜测，因为根据c#规范，它是由实现定义的。

所以你应该尝试访问成员并捕获异常，如果它失败了:

dynamic myVariable = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();

try
{
    var x = myVariable.MyProperty;
    // do stuff with x
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
    //  MyProperty doesn't exist
} 

我知道这是一个很老的帖子，但这里有一个简单的解决方案，在c#中使用动态类型。

可以使用简单的反射来枚举直接属性吗 或者可以使用对象扩展的方法 或使用GetAsOrDefault<int>方法获取一个新的强类型对象，如果存在则带值，如果不存在则默认。

public static class DynamicHelper
{
    private static void Test( )
    {
        dynamic myobj = new
                        {
                            myInt = 1,
                            myArray = new[ ]
                                      {
                                          1, 2.3
                                      },
                            myDict = new
                                     {
                                         myInt = 1
                                     }
                        };

        var myIntOrZero = myobj.GetAsOrDefault< int >( ( Func< int > )( ( ) => myobj.noExist ) );
        int? myNullableInt = GetAs< int >( myobj, ( Func< int > )( ( ) => myobj.myInt ) );

        if( default( int ) != myIntOrZero )
            Console.WriteLine( $"myInt: '{myIntOrZero}'" );

        if( default( int? ) != myNullableInt )
            Console.WriteLine( $"myInt: '{myNullableInt}'" );

        if( DoesPropertyExist( myobj, "myInt" ) )
            Console.WriteLine( $"myInt exists and it is: '{( int )myobj.myInt}'" );
    }

    public static bool DoesPropertyExist( dynamic dyn, string property )
    {
        var t = ( Type )dyn.GetType( );
        var props = t.GetProperties( );
        return props.Any( p => p.Name.Equals( property ) );
    }

    public static object GetAs< T >( dynamic obj, Func< T > lookup )
    {
        try
        {
            var val = lookup( );
            return ( T )val;
        }
        catch( RuntimeBinderException ) { }

        return null;
    }

    public static T GetAsOrDefault< T >( this object obj, Func< T > test )
    {
        try
        {
            var val = test( );
            return ( T )val;
        }
        catch( RuntimeBinderException ) { }

        return default( T );
    }
}

The two common solutions to this include making the call and catching the RuntimeBinderException, using reflection to check for the call, or serialising to a text format and parsing from there. The problem with exceptions is that they are very slow, because when one is constructed, the current call stack is serialised. Serialising to JSON or something analogous incurs a similar penalty. This leaves us with reflection but it only works if the underlying object is actually a POCO with real members on it. If it's a dynamic wrapper around a dictionary, a COM object, or an external web service, then reflection won't help.

另一种解决方案是使用IDynamicMetaObjectProvider获取DLR看到的成员名。在下面的例子中，我使用一个静态类(Dynamic)来测试Age字段并显示它。

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        dynamic x = new ExpandoObject();

        x.Name = "Damian Powell";
        x.Age = "21 (probably)";

        if (Dynamic.HasMember(x, "Age"))
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Age={0}", x.Age);
        }
    }
}

public static class Dynamic
{
    public static bool HasMember(object dynObj, string memberName)
    {
        return GetMemberNames(dynObj).Contains(memberName);
    }

    public static IEnumerable<string> GetMemberNames(object dynObj)
    {
        var metaObjProvider = dynObj as IDynamicMetaObjectProvider;

        if (null == metaObjProvider) throw new InvalidOperationException(
            "The supplied object must be a dynamic object " +
            "(i.e. it must implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider)"
        );

        var metaObj = metaObjProvider.GetMetaObject(
            Expression.Constant(metaObjProvider)
        );

        var memberNames = metaObj.GetDynamicMemberNames();

        return memberNames;
    }
}

由于ExpandoObject继承了IDictionary<string对象>，您可以使用以下检查

dynamic myVariable = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();

if (((IDictionary<string, object>)myVariable).ContainsKey("MyProperty"))    
//Do stuff

您可以创建一个实用程序方法来执行此检查，这将使代码更加清晰和可重用

根据@karask的回答，你可以像这样将函数包装为一个helper:

public static bool HasProperty(ExpandoObject expandoObj,
                               string name)
{
    return ((IDictionary<string, object>)expandoObj).ContainsKey(name);
}