对我来说，这是可行的:

if (IsProperty(() => DynamicObject.MyProperty))
  ; // do stuff



delegate string GetValueDelegate();

private bool IsProperty(GetValueDelegate getValueMethod)
{
    try
    {
        //we're not interesting in the return value.
        //What we need to know is whether an exception occurred or not

        var v = getValueMethod();
        return v != null;
    }
    catch (RuntimeBinderException)
    {
        return false;
    }
    catch
    {
        return true;
    }
}

我认为没有办法在不尝试访问动态变量的情况下发现动态变量是否有某个成员，除非你在c#编译器中重新实现动态绑定的处理方式。这可能包含很多猜测，因为根据c#规范，它是由实现定义的。

所以你应该尝试访问成员并捕获异常，如果它失败了:

dynamic myVariable = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();

try
{
    var x = myVariable.MyProperty;
    // do stuff with x
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
    //  MyProperty doesn't exist
} 

也许使用反射?

dynamic myVar = GetDataThatLooksVerySimilarButNotTheSame();
Type typeOfDynamic = myVar.GetType();
bool exist = typeOfDynamic.GetProperties().Where(p => p.Name.Equals("PropertyName")).Any(); 

The two common solutions to this include making the call and catching the RuntimeBinderException, using reflection to check for the call, or serialising to a text format and parsing from there. The problem with exceptions is that they are very slow, because when one is constructed, the current call stack is serialised. Serialising to JSON or something analogous incurs a similar penalty. This leaves us with reflection but it only works if the underlying object is actually a POCO with real members on it. If it's a dynamic wrapper around a dictionary, a COM object, or an external web service, then reflection won't help.

另一种解决方案是使用IDynamicMetaObjectProvider获取DLR看到的成员名。在下面的例子中，我使用一个静态类(Dynamic)来测试Age字段并显示它。

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        dynamic x = new ExpandoObject();

        x.Name = "Damian Powell";
        x.Age = "21 (probably)";

        if (Dynamic.HasMember(x, "Age"))
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Age={0}", x.Age);
        }
    }
}

public static class Dynamic
{
    public static bool HasMember(object dynObj, string memberName)
    {
        return GetMemberNames(dynObj).Contains(memberName);
    }

    public static IEnumerable<string> GetMemberNames(object dynObj)
    {
        var metaObjProvider = dynObj as IDynamicMetaObjectProvider;

        if (null == metaObjProvider) throw new InvalidOperationException(
            "The supplied object must be a dynamic object " +
            "(i.e. it must implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider)"
        );

        var metaObj = metaObjProvider.GetMetaObject(
            Expression.Constant(metaObjProvider)
        );

        var memberNames = metaObj.GetDynamicMemberNames();

        return memberNames;
    }
}

如果你控制的类型被用作动态，你不能返回一个元组而不是每个属性访问的值吗?之类的……

public class DynamicValue<T>
{
    internal DynamicValue(T value, bool exists)
    {
         Value = value;
         Exists = exists;
    }

    T Value { get; private set; }
    bool Exists { get; private set; }
}

可能是一个幼稚的实现，但如果您每次都在内部构造其中一个，并返回该值而不是实际值，那么您可以在每个属性访问上检查Exists，如果值为默认值(T)，则单击value(如果不为默认值，则不相关)。

也就是说，我可能会遗漏一些动态工作原理的知识，这可能不是一个可行的建议。

我在单元测试中遇到过类似的问题。

使用SharpTestsEx可以检查属性是否存在。我使用这个测试我的控制器，因为JSON对象是动态的，有人可以更改名称，而忘记在javascript中更改它或其他东西，所以在编写控制器时测试所有属性应该增加我的安全性。

例子:

dynamic testedObject = new ExpandoObject();
testedObject.MyName = "I am a testing object";

现在，使用SharTestsEx:

Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.MyName; }).Should().NotThrow();
Executing.This(delegate {var unused = testedObject.NotExistingProperty; }).Should().Throw();

使用这个，我测试所有现有的属性使用“Should(). notthrow()”。

这可能离题了，但对某人来说可能有用。