虽然它相当古老，但对一些人来说这可能是一个方便的解决方案:

一个扩展线程模块功能的小模块—— 允许一个线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常 线程。通过触发SystemExit，你最终可以杀死python线程。

import threading
import ctypes     

def _async_raise(tid, excobj):
    res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, ctypes.py_object(excobj))
    if res == 0:
        raise ValueError("nonexistent thread id")
    elif res > 1:
        # """if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble, 
        # and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"""
        ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(tid, 0)
        raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")

class Thread(threading.Thread):
    def raise_exc(self, excobj):
        assert self.isAlive(), "thread must be started"
        for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
            if tobj is self:
                _async_raise(tid, excobj)
                return

        # the thread was alive when we entered the loop, but was not found 
        # in the dict, hence it must have been already terminated. should we raise
        # an exception here? silently ignore?

    def terminate(self):
        # must raise the SystemExit type, instead of a SystemExit() instance
        # due to a bug in PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc
        self.raise_exc(SystemExit)

因此，它允许“线程在另一个线程的上下文中引发异常”，通过这种方式，被终止的线程可以处理终止，而无需定期检查中止标志。

然而，根据其原始来源，这段代码有一些问题。

The exception will be raised only when executing python bytecode. If your thread calls a native/built-in blocking function, the exception will be raised only when execution returns to the python code. There is also an issue if the built-in function internally calls PyErr_Clear(), which would effectively cancel your pending exception. You can try to raise it again. Only exception types can be raised safely. Exception instances are likely to cause unexpected behavior, and are thus restricted. For example: t1.raise_exc(TypeError) and not t1.raise_exc(TypeError("blah")). IMHO it's a bug, and I reported it as one. For more info, http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068158.html I asked to expose this function in the built-in thread module, but since ctypes has become a standard library (as of 2.5), and this feature is not likely to be implementation-agnostic, it may be kept unexposed.

您可以在进程中执行命令，然后使用进程id终止它。 我需要在两个线程之间同步，其中一个线程本身不返回。

processIds = []

def executeRecord(command):
    print(command)

    process = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
    processIds.append(process.pid)
    print(processIds[0])

    #Command that doesn't return by itself
    process.stdout.read().decode("utf-8")
    return;


def recordThread(command, timeOut):

    thread = Thread(target=executeRecord, args=(command,))
    thread.start()
    thread.join(timeOut)

    os.kill(processIds.pop(), signal.SIGINT)

    return;

正如其他人所提到的，规范是设置一个停止标志。对于一些轻量级的东西(没有Thread的子类化，没有全局变量)，lambda回调是一个选项。(注意if stop()中的括号。)

import threading
import time

def do_work(id, stop):
    print("I am thread", id)
    while True:
        print("I am thread {} doing something".format(id))
        if stop():
            print("  Exiting loop.")
            break
    print("Thread {}, signing off".format(id))


def main():
    stop_threads = False
    workers = []
    for id in range(0,3):
        tmp = threading.Thread(target=do_work, args=(id, lambda: stop_threads))
        workers.append(tmp)
        tmp.start()
    time.sleep(3)
    print('main: done sleeping; time to stop the threads.')
    stop_threads = True
    for worker in workers:
        worker.join()
    print('Finis.')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

将print()替换为始终刷新的pr()函数(sys.stdout.flush())可以提高shell输出的精度。

(仅在Windows/Eclipse/Python3.3上测试)

下面的方法可以用来杀死一个线程:

kill_threads = False

def doSomething():
    global kill_threads
    while True:
        if kill_threads:
            thread.exit()
        ......
        ......

thread.start_new_thread(doSomething, ())

这甚至可以用于从主线程终止代码写在另一个模块中的线程。我们可以在该模块中声明一个全局变量，并使用它来终止在该模块中生成的线程。

我通常使用它在程序出口终止所有线程。这可能不是终止线程的完美方法，但可能有帮助。

实现一个线程是绝对可能的。方法，如下例代码所示:

import sys
import threading
import time


class StopThread(StopIteration):
    pass

threading.SystemExit = SystemExit, StopThread


class Thread2(threading.Thread):

    def stop(self):
        self.__stop = True

    def _bootstrap(self):
        if threading._trace_hook is not None:
            raise ValueError('Cannot run thread with tracing!')
        self.__stop = False
        sys.settrace(self.__trace)
        super()._bootstrap()

    def __trace(self, frame, event, arg):
        if self.__stop:
            raise StopThread()
        return self.__trace


class Thread3(threading.Thread):

    def _bootstrap(self, stop_thread=False):
        def stop():
            nonlocal stop_thread
            stop_thread = True
        self.stop = stop

        def tracer(*_):
            if stop_thread:
                raise StopThread()
            return tracer
        sys.settrace(tracer)
        super()._bootstrap()

###############################################################################


def main():
    test1 = Thread2(target=printer)
    test1.start()
    time.sleep(1)
    test1.stop()
    test1.join()
    test2 = Thread2(target=speed_test)
    test2.start()
    time.sleep(1)
    test2.stop()
    test2.join()
    test3 = Thread3(target=speed_test)
    test3.start()
    time.sleep(1)
    test3.stop()
    test3.join()


def printer():
    while True:
        print(time.time() % 1)
        time.sleep(0.1)


def speed_test(count=0):
    try:
        while True:
            count += 1
    except StopThread:
        print('Count =', count)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

Thread3类运行代码的速度似乎比Thread2类快大约33%。

没有官方API来做这个，没有。

你需要使用平台API来杀死线程，例如pthread_kill或TerminateThread。你可以访问这样的API，例如通过pythonwin，或通过ctypes。

注意，这本质上是不安全的。这可能会导致不可收集的垃圾(来自堆栈帧的局部变量，成为垃圾)，并可能导致死锁，如果被杀死的线程在被杀死时具有GIL。