对于动态查询，我也更喜欢使用条件查询。但我更喜欢hql删除查询，例如，如果从父id 'xyz'的子表中删除所有记录，这很容易由hql实现，但对于标准API，首先我们必须触发n个删除查询，其中n是子表记录的数量。

HQL和criteriaQuery在性能上是有区别的，每次你使用criteriaQuery发起查询时，它会为表名创建一个新的别名，这个别名不会反映在任何DB的最后一个查询缓存中。这会导致编译生成的SQL的开销，需要更多的时间来执行。

关于抓取策略[http://www.hibernate.org/315.html]

Criteria respects the laziness settings in your mappings and guarantees that what you want loaded is loaded. This means one Criteria query might result in several SQL immediate SELECT statements to fetch the subgraph with all non-lazy mapped associations and collections. If you want to change the "how" and even the "what", use setFetchMode() to enable or disable outer join fetching for a particular collection or association. Criteria queries also completely respect the fetching strategy (join vs select vs subselect). HQL respects the laziness settings in your mappings and guarantees that what you want loaded is loaded. This means one HQL query might result in several SQL immediate SELECT statements to fetch the subgraph with all non-lazy mapped associations and collections. If you want to change the "how" and even the "what", use LEFT JOIN FETCH to enable outer-join fetching for a particular collection or nullable many-to-one or one-to-one association, or JOIN FETCH to enable inner join fetching for a non-nullable many-to-one or one-to-one association. HQL queries do not respect any fetch="join" defined in the mapping document.

对于动态查询，我更喜欢使用条件查询。例如，根据某些参数，动态地添加一些排序或保留一些部分(例如限制)要容易得多。

另一方面，我使用HQL进行静态和复杂的查询，因为它更容易理解/阅读HQL。此外，我认为HQL更强大一些，例如对于不同的连接类型。

对我来说，Criteria是一个很容易理解的动态查询。但我说到目前为止的缺陷是，它加载所有的多-一等关系，因为我们只有三种类型的FetchModes，即选择，代理和默认，在所有这些情况下，它加载多-一(可能是我错了，如果这样帮助我:))

第二个问题与标准是，它加载完整的对象，即，如果我想只是加载一个员工的EmpName，它不会提出这个，而是提出完整的员工对象，我可以从它得到EmpName，因为这真的工作不好的报告。因为HQL只是加载(没有加载关联/关系)你想要的，所以性能会提高很多倍。

Criteria的一个特点是，它将使你免受SQL注入的伤害，因为它的动态查询生成，而在HQL中，ur的查询要么是固定的，要么是参数化的，因此在SQL注入中不安全。

同样，如果你在你的aspx.cs文件中编写HQL，那么你与你的DAL紧密耦合。

总的来说，我的结论是，有些地方你不能没有HQL，比如报告，所以使用它们，否则Criteria更容易管理。

Criteria是一个面向对象的API，而HQL意味着字符串连接。这意味着面向对象的所有好处都适用:

All else being equal, the OO version is somewhat less prone to error. Any old string could get appended into the HQL query, whereas only valid Criteria objects can make it into a Criteria tree. Effectively, the Criteria classes are more constrained. With auto-complete, the OO is more discoverable (and thus easier to use, for me at least). You don't necessarily need to remember which parts of the query go where; the IDE can help you You also don't need to remember the particulars of the syntax (like which symbols go where). All you need to know is how to call methods and create objects.

由于HQL非常像SQL(大多数开发人员已经非常了解SQL)，因此这些“不必记住”参数就没有那么重要了。如果HQL有更大的不同，那么这就更重要了。

HQL is to perform both select and non-select operations on the data, but Criteria is only for selecting the data, we cannot perform non-select operations using criteria HQL is suitable for executing Static Queries, where as Criteria is suitable for executing Dynamic Queries HQL doesn’t support pagination concept, but we can achieve pagination with Criteria Criteria used to take more time to execute then HQL With Criteria we are safe with SQL Injection because of its dynamic query generation but in HQL as your queries are either fixed or parametrized, there is no safe from SQL Injection.

源